Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-12-2010, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,275,280 times
Reputation: 6921

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzlover View Post
Re-read my post about agriculture. It's a very difficult, capital-intensive business in which to try to make a living. It's virtually impossible in places like Durango because land prices are many times in excess of what that land can EVER produce in agricultural production.
I think that's been true there since they started putting up barb wire in the '90s, the 1890s that is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-12-2010, 12:59 PM
 
Location: mancos
7,788 posts, read 8,039,152 times
Reputation: 6706
actually the unemployment is much higher many of us in construction are self employed and don't count. most i know are out of or can find very little work. many others left the area. even the cit and schools are laying off and they have to leave.you cant live in Dgo on unemployment. i am lucky as i live in a nearby town that is more affordable. 99% of my work has always been in Dgo.over the past 30 years 80% of friends and acquaintances have left
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2010, 01:27 PM
 
Location: In my own world
879 posts, read 1,733,911 times
Reputation: 1031
For the past 20 years, innumerable small vacation areas across this vast country, much like Durango, have had a growing disconnect between the cost of living and local wages. Most of this price discrepancy is in the form of housing, though necessities such as food, etc. are higher as well. This was driven by the wealthy buying multiple homes, especially as prices on their primary homes increased, and also the desires of many to "escape" the bigger cities, and live in what were historically vacation areas.

This model is now broken. A lot of these same people are now downsizing their lives, and one of the first things they sell are the "vacation homes", even though they've sometimes acted as primary residences. As housing prices fall, the second home markets take huge hits. Given the choice of one or the other, people usually keep their primary residences in the cities and suburbs because most have to work and cannot commute from these far flung areas. There is actually a very small portion of the population who are wealthy and don't have to work.

What we saw, in terms of housing costs over the past few decades, was completely unsustainable, and now it's time to pay the piper. We will likely never see such an extraordinary increase in prices again in our lifetimes. There is a fundamental shift underway right now, and it's in the direction of frugality and a more sustainable lifestyle. That doesn't bode well for monstrous, expensive properties and most second home markets.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2010, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,275,280 times
Reputation: 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by NomadicBear View Post
For the past 20 years, innumerable small vacation areas across this vast country, much like Durango, have had a growing disconnect between the cost of living and local wages. Most of this price discrepancy is in the form of housing, though necessities such as food, etc. are higher as well. This was driven by the wealthy buying multiple homes, especially as prices on their primary homes increased, and also the desires of many to "escape" the bigger cities, and live in what were historically vacation areas.

This model is now broken. A lot of these same people are now downsizing their lives, and one of the first things they sell are the "vacation homes", even though they've sometimes acted as primary residences. As housing prices fall, the second home markets take huge hits. Given the choice of one or the other, people usually keep their primary residences in the cities and suburbs because most have to work and cannot commute from these far flung areas. There is actually a very small portion of the population who are wealthy and don't have to work.

What we saw, in terms of housing costs over the past few decades, was completely unsustainable, and now it's time to pay the piper. We will likely never see such an extraordinary increase in prices again in our lifetimes. There is a fundamental shift underway right now, and it's in the direction of frugality and a more sustainable lifestyle. That doesn't bode well for monstrous, expensive properties and most second home markets.
Don't bet the ranch on it. There are still a lot of folks in places like New York and DC who are sitting on piles of (TARP) cash who will keep the home market in places like Durango out of reach of most locals. Also, as companies shift office workers to telecommuters (like mine, which is huge) people will be able to live anywhere and still get big city paychecks. Many will choose to live in scenic spots. Basically we're going to have a two-tiered real estate market of expensive desirable places and a depressed everywhere else. Wealth in this country is centralizing and there are only so many great places for those folks to live.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2010, 01:41 PM
 
Location: In my own world
879 posts, read 1,733,911 times
Reputation: 1031
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
Don't bet the ranch on it. There are still a lot of folks in places like New York and DC who are sitting on piles of (TARP) cash who will keep the home market in places like Durango out of reach of most locals. Also, as companies shift office workers to telecommuters (like mine, which is huge) people will be able to live anywhere and still get big city paychecks. Many will choose to live in scenic spots. Basically we're going to have a two-tiered real estate market of expensive desirable places and a depressed everywhere else. Wealth in this country is centralizing and there are only so many great places for those folks to live.
You're dreaming. The real estate market in places like Tahoe has cratered. There are a plethora of rentals available, and rental prices have tanked. Your post shows that you have little understanding of the structural flaws in real estate, and what's in store. Keep drinking that Kool-Aid, but don't be surprised when you get sick.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2010, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,275,280 times
Reputation: 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by NomadicBear View Post
You're dreaming. The real estate market in places like Tahoe has cratered. There are a plethora of rentals available, and rental prices have tanked. Your post shows that you have little understanding of the structural flaws in real estate, and what's in store. Keep drinking that Kool-Aid, but don't be surprised when you get sick.
Let's just say I've been around the block a few times and seen this film before. I'm also talking about home prices, not rents.

Last edited by CAVA1990; 01-12-2010 at 01:54 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2010, 01:53 PM
 
Location: In my own world
879 posts, read 1,733,911 times
Reputation: 1031
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAVA1990 View Post
Let's just say I've been around the block a few times and seen this film before.
Actually, no you haven't. This country has never before seen a credit bubble like we just experienced. It was credit which drove up the prices in the first place, and to deny that is to not even understand what is happening around you. Your arguments are nothing more than a belief in the "new paradigm" theory which has already been proven false in all markets.

Incline Village, Lake Tahoe, is one of the most expensive, exclusive markets in the entire country, home to extraordinarily wealthy people such as Michael Milken, etc., not "telecommuters" who are absolute peons in comparison. Prices there have cratered almost 50%. The richest of the rich cannot prop up prices in those areas, yet you think a place like Durango is going to hold it's value? Pleeeease....

Last edited by NomadicBear; 01-12-2010 at 02:07 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2010, 05:10 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,275,280 times
Reputation: 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by NomadicBear View Post
Incline Village, Lake Tahoe, is one of the most expensive, exclusive markets in the entire country, home to extraordinarily wealthy people such as Michael Milken, etc., not "telecommuters" who are absolute peons in comparison. Prices there have cratered almost 50%. The richest of the rich cannot prop up prices in those areas, yet you think a place like Durango is going to hold it's value? Pleeeease....
Forgive me, I thought we are on the Colorado forum. I think Incline is in Nevada, nowhere near or like Durango. I'll stand corrected if the folks in Colorado chime in here and tell us rents or home prices have "cratered" or dropped 50%. Anyone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2010, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,275,280 times
Reputation: 6921
Also, show me proof that prices of same homes in Incline have dropped by 50%. That hasn't even happened in the Bay Area or Reno. According to stats I'm looking at, the selling price per sq. ft. in Incline has dropped 16% since last year, nowhere near 50%.

http://www.trulia.com/real_estate/In...illage-Nevada/

Here are listing price stats for Durango. Prices are flat, not declining significantly.

http://www.trulia.com/real_estate/Durango-Colorado/

Last edited by CAVA1990; 01-12-2010 at 05:27 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-12-2010, 05:53 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,275,280 times
Reputation: 6921
Quote:
Originally Posted by NomadicBear View Post
home to extraordinarily wealthy people such as Michael Milken, etc.,
and tell me how these super rich folk are hurting right now? Last I heard they're earning rather sizeable bonuses. Plus the stock market is kicking butt. What am I missing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2022 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Colorado

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top