Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-18-2011, 01:32 PM
 
2,249 posts, read 2,205,285 times
Reputation: 1475

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikelizard860 View Post
you need to turn the Merritt parkway from Greenwich to route 8 interchange into a true interstate with 3 lanes in each direction. .

CANT AGREE MORE! The Merritt with 2 lanes was fine 50+ years ago. Pretty and scenic,yes.......But 2 lanes does not work anymore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-18-2011, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,502 posts, read 75,252,292 times
Reputation: 16619
Quote:
Originally Posted by mkiv808 View Post
How are you going to do 8 lanes each direction? Build on top?
Eminant domain. Take away the land, tear down structures, add the lanes needed. More jobs created in the process. To build the lanes and to build the structures back up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkiv808 View Post
They really had to study that? All you have to do is look at the traffic cams that have been there for years to see the gridlock. Or actually drive it.
Great point. lol here's a look from just 3 minutes ago.

ConnDOT: CCTV# 10 Greenwich SB S/O Exit 6 - Laddins Rock Rd.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2011, 02:09 PM
 
Location: Coastal Connecticut
21,722 posts, read 28,055,508 times
Reputation: 6704
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cambium View Post
Eminant domain. Take away the land, tear down structures, add the lanes needed. More jobs created in the process. To build the lanes and to build the structures back up.
I don't even want to fathom the cost of that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2011, 02:51 PM
 
Location: Milford
160 posts, read 446,772 times
Reputation: 66
Lets tear down everything and rebuild it all, that will be lots of jobs.

Last edited by Milfordlol; 08-18-2011 at 03:14 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2011, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,502 posts, read 75,252,292 times
Reputation: 16619
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milfordlol View Post
Lets tear down everything and rebuild it all, that will be lots of jobs.
LOL. How about. Lets tear down everything and dont rebuild at all. There will be less people on the road down there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2011, 08:27 PM
 
Location: On the Rails in Northern NJ
12,380 posts, read 26,844,597 times
Reputation: 4581
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVTJayC View Post
Jobs fleeing the state should fix it. I think that's the current Governor's plan.

Improving Metro North to semi-reliable status would help as well.
Hehe , The New Haven line has been slowly getting an upgrade....but at a really slow pace. Infact since 1989 its been getting wires , tracks and signals replaced. Its only 74 miles long , which is pathetic considering NJT has replaced all of there 200+ wires back in the 80s , tracks were just upgraded along with signals..... Only took 5 years each , then the Bridges were replaced or upgraded.... CT has yet to replace any of the bridges yet , although there are plans to replace all of them by 2030....yea right..... As for the wires , who knows , Capacity has been increased but that's just in CT , on the NY side Capacity will be reached by 2030 and will not be increased....at least to GCT...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2011, 08:33 PM
 
680 posts, read 1,575,429 times
Reputation: 180
Why do topics like this pop out every 2 months? There is only one solution: CREATE A TOLL PLAN that is flexible in pricing according to time period of the day so there is a fixed amount of cars on the road. Use the toll collected to subsidize bus services to let people who can't afford to travel on the road at least afford to travel to work.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 01:45 PM
 
1,195 posts, read 1,625,453 times
Reputation: 973
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikelizard860 View Post
You probably need 8 lanes in each direction(16 lanes total) on I-95 up to Bridgeport to alleviate congestion for the next 30 years and you need to turn the Merritt parkway from Greenwich to route 8 interchange into a true interstate with 3 lanes in each direction.
What about 100 years? Are you going to have 16 lanes in each direction?

At some point, there needs to be a more efficient way of transporting large groups of people in congested areas.

In fact, there already is, but it doesn't get nearly enough funding or development, and no one wants 'MY TAX DOLLARS' used for it even though they're paying more than that sitting in their cars for 4 hours a day going gray.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,502 posts, read 75,252,292 times
Reputation: 16619
Quote:
Originally Posted by basehead617 View Post
What about 100 years? Are you going to have 16 lanes in each direction?
There's only so much land to build on...At that point there might not be any more room to "add" people. Or maybe the trend will be elsewhere by then.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2011, 08:50 PM
 
2,601 posts, read 3,396,090 times
Reputation: 2395
Quote:
Originally Posted by basehead617 View Post
What about 100 years? Are you going to have 16 lanes in each direction?

At some point, there needs to be a more efficient way of transporting large groups of people in congested areas.

In fact, there already is, but it doesn't get nearly enough funding or development, and no one wants 'MY TAX DOLLARS' used for it even though they're paying more than that sitting in their cars for 4 hours a day going gray.
It's called overpopulation. I don't know why so many feel the need to have 2 to 4 kids and like having a child at all is an absolute must.??? That's the real problem. But that's a bigger issue. I-95 needs to be 8 lanes in each direction NOW with the current mass transit we have in place, forget about years from now. Does building more highway lead to more urban sprawl? I'm not really sure. Maybe?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top