Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-20-2019, 03:31 PM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,513 posts, read 75,277,900 times
Reputation: 16619

Advertisements

So from Route 7 Connector to Greenwich exit it used to take 25-30 minutes with regular rush hour traffic between 7-9am..

Past couple months its now taking 40-50 minutes. So yeah, sometimes double the time. The amount of volume has been extreme and I know this from using the road everyday at the same hour. There is no way new drivers are on the road or people that moved to Lower Fairfield and work in NY in a matter of 2 months. So it dawned on me!


Ever since they started on the whole I-287 renovation area Merritt has built up. For those of you who don't know, either Google it or drive by on I-95 to the NY/CT border and look for yourself. Insane amount of work being done to expand the ramps and area where 287 meets I-95. 1 lane exit for 287 and 2 lanes for I95 south. This has created a back up on I-95 right lane for miles.


Did I lose you yet??


So it dawned on me. .. more and more people are finding the Merritt to be an alternate route vs just sitting on I-95 to get to 287.


The volume on the merit is insane and over the limit now. Where it used to open up in Stamford, is now crawling. Where it used to crawl is now standstill. Stop & Gos are a shorter distance.


But this is what would happen is tolls were JUST put on I-95 only. I see the future happening if they do that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-20-2019, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Connecticut
5,104 posts, read 4,832,669 times
Reputation: 3636
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cambium View Post
So from Route 7 Connector to Greenwich exit it used to take 25-30 minutes with regular rush hour traffic between 7-9am..

Past couple months its now taking 40-50 minutes. So yeah, sometimes double the time. The amount of volume has been extreme and I know this from using the road everyday at the same hour. There is no way new drivers are on the road or people that moved to Lower Fairfield and work in NY in a matter of 2 months. So it dawned on me!

Ever since they started on the whole I-287 renovation area Merritt has built up. For those of you who don't know, either Google it or drive by on I-95 to the NY/CT border and look for yourself. Insane amount of work being done to expand the ramps and area where 287 meets I-95. 1 lane exit for 287 and 2 lanes for I95 south. This has created a back up on I-95 right lane for miles.

Did I lose you yet??

So it dawned on me. .. more and more people are finding the Merritt to be an alternate route vs just sitting on I-95 to get to 287.

The volume on the merit is insane and over the limit now. Where it used to open up in Stamford, is now crawling. Where it used to crawl is now standstill. Stop & Gos are a shorter distance.

But this is what would happen is tolls were JUST put on I-95 only. I see the future happening if they do that.



People won't switch roads if the tolls are low enough i.e. .50 cents - 1.00 dollar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-20-2019, 07:31 PM
 
215 posts, read 148,153 times
Reputation: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGompers View Post
People won't switch roads if the tolls are low enough i.e. .50 cents - 1.00 dollar.
and even if they did, it would just make the tolled road faster....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2019, 06:37 AM
 
Location: USA
6,892 posts, read 3,738,611 times
Reputation: 3499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cambium View Post
So from Route 7 Connector to Greenwich exit it used to take 25-30 minutes with regular rush hour traffic between 7-9am..

Past couple months its now taking 40-50 minutes. So yeah, sometimes double the time. The amount of volume has been extreme and I know this from using the road everyday at the same hour. There is no way new drivers are on the road or people that moved to Lower Fairfield and work in NY in a matter of 2 months. So it dawned on me!


Ever since they started on the whole I-287 renovation area Merritt has built up. For those of you who don't know, either Google it or drive by on I-95 to the NY/CT border and look for yourself. Insane amount of work being done to expand the ramps and area where 287 meets I-95. 1 lane exit for 287 and 2 lanes for I95 south. This has created a back up on I-95 right lane for miles.


Did I lose you yet??


So it dawned on me. .. more and more people are finding the Merritt to be an alternate route vs just sitting on I-95 to get to 287.


The volume on the merit is insane and over the limit now. Where it used to open up in Stamford, is now crawling. Where it used to crawl is now standstill. Stop & Gos are a shorter distance.


But this is what would happen is tolls were JUST put on I-95 only. I see the future happening if they do that.
Merritt was smooth sailing through Greenwich this am. I get on at Old Stamford Rd and it usually opens up after the Den Rd exit. Sometimes there is a little slowdown before the Lake Ave exit but you fly in to NY after that. No way though would I ever live east of Rt 7, we're CT Stubbers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2019, 07:29 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,924 posts, read 56,924,455 times
Reputation: 11220
So it appears there is growing opposition to the Republican Plan to tap into the Rainy Day Fund to pay down pension obligations and then borrow money to fund some of Governor Lamont’s CT2030 transportation projects. Not surprising since the plan really is gambling on our future and once again placing the financial burden on future generations. Jay

https://ctmirror.org/2019/11/20/wood...fidence-in-ct/

https://ctmirror.org/2019/11/20/some...-analysts-say/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2019, 07:41 AM
 
996 posts, read 378,864 times
Reputation: 453
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayCT View Post
So it appears there is growing opposition to the Republican Plan to tap into the Rainy Day Fund to pay down pension obligations and then borrow money to fund some of Governor Lamont’s CT2030 transportation projects. Not surprising since the plan really is gambling on our future and once again placing the financial burden on future generations. Jay

https://ctmirror.org/2019/11/20/wood...fidence-in-ct/

https://ctmirror.org/2019/11/20/some...-analysts-say/
However Democrats don't seem to be concerned about " placing the financial burden on future generations." in regards to State Employee Pensions , SHHHH
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2019, 08:13 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,924 posts, read 56,924,455 times
Reputation: 11220
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuele View Post
However Democrats don't seem to be concerned about " placing the financial burden on future generations." in regards to State Employee Pensions , SHHHH
The Republicans share that blame. Remember we had 20 years of Republican Governors that did nothing to change things. They just kicked the can down the road. Jay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2019, 08:58 AM
 
1,724 posts, read 1,146,129 times
Reputation: 2286
The idea that nothing has been about pensions is a giant myth. The contract has been re-negotiated many times--with less cushy pensions for state employees each time. Why haven't we seen a major change as far as tax burdens? Because they grandfathered it in. Many of the current retirees are Tier 2---a very generous pension plan. But state employees currently working won't be so lucky. So the pension burden is going to lessen, we just have to wait.

The real question might be: why did they grandfather this in? Probably because going after seniors seems to be a political non starter. You don't want to appear like you're leaving old folks out in the cold and seniors vote at higher rates than any other voting block.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2019, 09:08 AM
 
Location: USA
6,892 posts, read 3,738,611 times
Reputation: 3499
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanthegoldengod View Post
The idea that nothing has been about pensions is a giant myth. The contract has been re-negotiated many times--with less cushy pensions for state employees each time. Why haven't we seen a major change as far as tax burdens? Because they grandfathered it in. Many of the current retirees are Tier 2---a very generous pension plan. But state employees currently working won't be so lucky. So the pension burden is going to lessen, we just have to wait.

The real question might be: why did they grandfather this in? Probably because going after seniors seems to be a political non starter. You don't want to appear like you're leaving old folks out in the cold and seniors vote at higher rates than any other voting block.
You are correct but in the case of Teachers (on CT STRB), they don't get Social Security so they HAVE to be grandfathered.
Do other state employees get SS? I am not sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2019, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
34,924 posts, read 56,924,455 times
Reputation: 11220
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanthegoldengod View Post
The idea that nothing has been about pensions is a giant myth. The contract has been re-negotiated many times--with less cushy pensions for state employees each time. Why haven't we seen a major change as far as tax burdens? Because they grandfathered it in. Many of the current retirees are Tier 2---a very generous pension plan. But state employees currently working won't be so lucky. So the pension burden is going to lessen, we just have to wait.

The real question might be: why did they grandfather this in? Probably because going after seniors seems to be a political non starter. You don't want to appear like you're leaving old folks out in the cold and seniors vote at higher rates than any other voting block.
The reason they are grandfathered in is because the contract retirement benefits in place when an employee is hired follows them throughout their career and the Courts have ruled that Can’t be changed. It’s been tried to break the contract but has failed. Jay
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Connecticut
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top