Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So when the whole "things are equal blacks can marry within their own race just like whites" argument was overruled the court was wrong?
No, of course not. Black men were not afforded the same rights to marry a white woman as were white men. It was not the RELATIONSHIP at issue. It was the SKIN COLOR of one of the people. Requiring a certain skin color to enter into a marriage contract is treating people differently under the law. The MAN (black) was seeking to marry a WOMAN (white), so skin color was the discrimination, not the relationship that marriage was legally intended to create.
The law was forbidding a man his legal right to marry a woman, solely based on his skin color and that is unequal treatment under the law.
Look where it comes from? Under ritualistic practices like sacrificing children to Molech.
Follow the context. Sexual sins come earlier, then there is a break into ritualistic practices. I don;t know of any gays having ritualistic sex in temples to Molech, do you?
You are really obtuse. But you have a personal agenda that does not allow for rational discussion. My children were that age once. Have a good life jjrose.
Really, didn't you just admit that gay marriage is your Selma? That is EXATLY the point of that article.
I do not have "Selma envy" and I do not agree that "gay marriage isn't about justice". I do not agree that people "invent a monster of anti-gay bigotry". I do not agree with many other statements the writer makes.
You seem to believe that you know more about constitutional law than the scores of judges, including the supreme court on several occasions, that have ruled on such cases.
Where did you attend law school, and when were you a supreme court justice or state judge, or circuit court judge?
That JUDGES are demi-gods and not subject to corruption and political social engineering for a promotion.
You never addressed my contentions you went on the person attacks of ad-hominem YOU KNOW WHY?
because I just blew you and your judges out of the water. Had I been wrong you would have went after that to get satisfaction, but no, you ignored the truth of my post and did what lawyers who got showed up do! PERSONAL ATTACKS ...nice try but, lame.
YOUR QUESTIONS DON'T DESERVE AN ANSWER because you did not stay on topic and challenge by rebuttal to your contentions.
You are really obtuse. But you have a personal agenda that does not allow for rational discussion. My children were that age once. Have a good life jjrose.
Oh poor thing, can't handle the fact that you don't understand the context of Leviticus?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And you seem to think
