Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
the mosques they want to close are the radical ones, where the radical imams have preached, not the other mosques. and it's not like it's a big deal since i'm sure many others will be build in the future. since what happened in paris, people can't seem to hide their dislike of france anymore, maybe a section should be created just for this, will be popular i bet.
here, a "better' article, in french obviously, so no one will read it.
All the radicalized mosques do is preach hate. They are a breeding ground for terrorism. If the leaders of the mosque are preaching hate toward the country they reside in or any allies , then they should be shut down immediately.
Theres a difference between freedom of speech , and preaching destruction of western countries.
Welcome to the world of selective reporting, outrage and what to and not to emphasize based on the agenda at hand. Gotta love what the media has become in many instances. And the large amount of sheep that follow it without question.
Closing "some" mosques to rid us of the radical clerics is much like spraying an apartment for roaches in a large apartment building, all they do is relocate. BTW, no accident I compare clerics to roaches. The way I see it, we are at war with the Muslims and since we are unable to identify the evil ones, they all are suspect and need to be shown the door.
You don't think the members of "radical" mosques are going to get really hot under the collar when you shut them down? Know what happens if there really are radical members (and there may not be)?
He wouldn't have even considered saying that if the issue were "radical" Christian denominations suspected of, say, bombing abortion clinics.
You don't think the members of "radical" mosques are going to get really hot under the collar when you shut them down?
they'll go somewhere else, or leave, or bomb something, and then would be killed or deported. the radicals don't care anyway, they can be radical out of mosques, they don't need them to spread their hate, they have internet, cellphones, etc.
You don't think the members of "radical" mosques are going to get really hot under the collar when you shut them down? Know what happens if there really are radical members (and there may not be)?
He wouldn't have even considered saying that if the issue were "radical" Christian denominations suspected of, say, bombing abortion clinics.
Are you suggesting when someone is breaking the law/we have strong evidence that one is doing or planning something ugly that we shouldn't prosecute them because they might get "hot under the collar"?
Let the people we think/have strong evidence on that are murderers, rapists, killers, whatever alone cause they might get mad/stir them up?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
