Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You can google it, but with 60,000 kids just in 2016 being taken away from abusive/neglectful moms/dads, I think the stats speak for themselves.
The sexuality of the crazies is irrelevant.
You can google it, but with 60,000 kids just in 2016 being taken away from abusive/neglectful moms/dads, I think the stats speak for themselves. The sexuality of the crazies is irrelevant.
Sexuality most certainly is relevant if the abuse was/is being ignored because of it. It's strange to me how nobody even entertains that notion.
You can google it, but with 60,000 kids just in 2016 being taken away from abusive/neglectful moms/dads, I think the stats speak for themselves.
The sexuality of the crazies is irrelevant.
How many of these 60,000 children were removed from adoptive parents, rather than bio parents? I think you'd find a far lower percentage of adopted kids among this sad total.
Clearly, neither of these women should ever have adopted or had biological children at all, and it's a disgraceful tragedy that none of the previous reports of abuse were taken seriously enough to remove the children from them. Hindsight...
There's a current case going on in NH where abuse has not yet been proven but there are a LOT of red flags. In that case, though, it was the parents who were killed.
There's a big push right now in the right wing evangelical community for people to adopt children for Jesus. When the children are insufficiently grateful, the parents abuse them and eventually either kill them, throw them out on the street (sometimes even fabricating assaults, calling the police, and having the child arrested) or putting them on a plane with a one way ticket back to their country of origin, with no money, a changed identification, and having been stripped of their citizenship.
What was it about those two females that netted them six adopted children in the first place? Was it their lesbianism or their "marriage" that made them so attractive to the adoption services.
I would think it was their willingness to take in sibling groups of older children of color. Its not like a lesbian couple who wants to adopt is going to just be handed over baby after baby.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Javacoffee
It is evil when you call someone a bigot for bringing to light what may have gotten six children murdered.
You really think the mothers being gay is what caused the children's deaths? I would have thought it was some serious mental health issues... Unless you think being gay is a mental health issue (which its not).
I would think it was their willingness to take in sibling groups of older children of color. Its not like a lesbian couple who wants to adopt is going to just be handed over baby after baby.
You really think the mothers being gay is what caused the children's deaths? I would have thought it was some serious mental health issues... Unless you think being gay is a mental health issue (which its not).
You may be absolutely correct. I don't know. None of us does. What bothers me is that nobody wants to ponder ANY possibility that the CPS authorities turned a blind eye because of the lesbian factor. Are you 100% sure that didn't happen?
All I'm saying is "Let's look", but everyone else is screaming "Bigot!" at me.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.