Quote:
Originally Posted by Cida
The issue has occasionally come up in the news when a local company has hiked prices during a disaster.
But I was thinking of it now in terms of this article about hospital charges. For instance, as this author says, charging "$20 for a pill that costs pennies at a pharmacy." We all expect a reasonable mark-up. But is there some point when it becomes illegal, especially when they're taking advantage of a captive clientele?
|
It's perfectly legal for hospitals to price-gouge because your State legislature has made it so.
You don't have a Free Market in medical care.
State laws allow hospitals to operate as monopolies and monopolistic cartels.
When the American Hospital Association bribed, uh, sorry, lobbied your State legislatures to grant them monopoly power, they did so under the guise that the free healthcare offered to low-income patients would offset the negative economic effects of monopoly.
So, question, exactly how much free healthcare do hospitals provide annually for low-income patients?
That, in fact, is a trick question, because neither you nor anyone else in the US knows.
When the American Hospital Association wrote the legislation granting their hospitals monopoly power, they made absolutely certain that the Bill contained no reporting requirements whatsoever.
The law does not require hospitals to file reports with county or State governments at any time showing how much free healthcare was provided.
But, you're right and that's why I refuse to donate blood.
We have the Hoxworth Blood Center here. They want you to donate.
Last time I checked, Hoxworth sells the blood to hospitals for $786/pint.
The hospital then sells it back to you for $3,000 or $5,000 or $10,000 or whatever they feel like charging you.
You can sell your blood here. Places will pay you $45-$65/pint, and they sell it for over $700 (but I don't know the exact amount).
Then the hospital sells it back to you for $3,000 or $5,000 or $10,000 or whatever they feel like charging you.
That's what hospitals do: Throw spaghetti at the wall to see if it sticks. Here's a good real world example:
Wills v Foster 229 Ill. 2d 393 (2008)
The plaintiff owed
$80,163 in medical bills but the hospital accepted an insurance company negotiated settlement of $19,005
in full satisfaction.
Let's be clear on the concept here.
The hospital billed $80,163, not the insurance company.
The insurance company is the hero here, because they did a tremendous favor to everyone by negotiating a settlement of $19,005.
I can literally show you Millions of cases just like that.
That's an everyday occurrence all over the US. Hospital bills $140,000 and insurance settles for $60,000. Hospital bills $32,000 and insurances settles for $11,000. Hospital bills $280,000 and insurance settles for $94,000.
In terms of Economics, there are three models of healthcare delivery:
1) the Hospital Model
2) the Clinic Model
3) the Policlinic Model
The Euro-States that everyone is gaga about do not use the Hospital Model. They abandoned it because it's antiquated and obsolete and the most ineffective most costly method of healthcare delivery.
Child-birth where I am is about $9,200. In a Euro-style birthing clinic it would cost $2,300.
A higher level of care at 1/3rd the price.
The morons who keep screaming "Universal Healthcare" don't understand that Euro-States spend less in part because they do not use the Hospital Model.
Hospital Administrators are like Medieval Roman Catholic Bishops. They built gigantic behemoth cathedrals as a monument to the god-thing.
Hospital Administrators build gigantic behemoth hospitals as monuments to themselves.
You need to put an end to that.
Sadly, Americans are too politically lazy to demand that their State legislators repeal the laws that allow them to be screwed in hospital.