Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So as a boy, he ate what was put in front of him. How awful!
And as an adult who supposedly loves dogs, he has no issue with it. In facts looks back on it as a good experience. How robotic. How out of touch. How can he love dogs?
This is the same thing Democrats do to the Romney story.
The point is that you Democrats are lying, distorting, and spinning with Romney's Dog Story and then you expect Republicans to perfectly treat Obama's Dog Story.
The original and only source of the Romney dog story said that the dog enjoyed it, would try to jump back up there and it was protected from the wind....and yet you clowns ignore this part of the story every time to paint a picture of a dog cowering in fear. The point is, there is no evidence to suggest this, the only source says otherwise. Yes this same source said the dog pooped and peed up there, that doesn't indicate fear, it indicates that it had to "go"...unless my backyard is a really scary place.
"Lying?"
If it isn't a big deal, why so defensive?
Did he or didn't he put his dog in a crate on the roof of his car and drive 12 hours with said dog in that position?
Personally, I don't know why anyone would need to spin this story.
As for the person who said that the dog enjoyed it, don't care.
People say stupid stuff like this all the time to justify poor behavior.
Doesn't make it any less stupid.
And, I notice that all of the Romney supporters are completely ignoring the fact that one of Mr. Romney's donors killed, barbecued and ate a dog as an adult. Willfully and of his own accord.
He and Mr. Romney get a pass, but, the president, who had no control over his childhood situation doesn't.
Right.
And as an adult who supposedly loves dogs, he has no issue with it. In facts looks back on it as a good experience. How robotic. How out of touch. How can he love dogs?
This is the same thing Democrats do to the Romney story.
Kids in 4H love the cows, pigs, sheep. etc. that they raise too. And guess what, those animals often get eaten after the ribbons are won and the fairs are over.
Kids in 4H love the cows, pigs, sheep. etc. that they raise too. And guess what, those animals often get eaten after the ribbons are won and the fairs are over.
What does one have to do with the other?
President Puppy Chow would most certainly eat more dogs if he had the chance. That much is clear from the robotic, heartless intonation he gave when reading the line from his book in the audio version.
No true dog lover could vote for a creep like Obama.
President Puppy Chow would most certainly eat more dogs if he had the chance. That much is clear from the robotic, heartless intonation he gave when reading the line from his book in the audio version.
No true dog lover could vote for a creep like Obama.
And you base this on what exactly?
Do you feel the same about Mr. Romney's friend - you know, the one who threw Mrs. Romney her birthday party this year?
He actually went out, hunted a stray dog, killed it, barbecued it and ate it.
Notice that these actions have not in any way dissuaded the Romneys from associating with this man. Oh, no. He is warmly embraced.
Nor has it dissuaded his supporters from continuing their hypocritical rantings against the president.
So, unless you have proof that Bo is going to end up on the president's table, this dog lover will be voting for Mr. Obama come November.
Have to say, though, I'd be very suspicious about what kind of meat might be served at an event hosted by the Romneys' dear friend.
President Puppy Chow would most certainly eat more dogs if he had the chance. That much is clear from the robotic, heartless intonation he gave when reading the line from his book in the audio version.
No true dog lover could vote for a creep like Obama.
And no dog lover would vote for a creep like Mittens, NEXT!
Was Romney suppose to be responsible for his donors actions?
Responsible, no.
Repelled, repulsed, disgusted - most definitely.
Surely if a child is to be held accountable for eating a meal that was provided to him, an adult should certainly be held accountable for disregarding what was in fact an illegal, not to mention barbaric, act.
Has Romney been in contact with this donor since he cooked the dog?
You mean Mr. President and his dog eating?
Romney would be hot dogs.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
