Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-05-2015, 10:53 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
I agree with with your definition.. No need for all the false drama. This defines the Clintons exactly.
Except it doesn't define the Clintons at all.

They aren't multi-generational. President Clinton and Secretary Clinton are of the same generation. They have only recently come into wealth. I would say they are a power-couple. But until Chelsea or their grandchildren start pursuing political power, the Clintons are NOT a dynasty.

And there was no false drama. Snark from you, maybe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-05-2015, 11:51 AM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,556,977 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Except it doesn't define the Clintons at all.

They aren't multi-generational. President Clinton and Secretary Clinton are of the same generation. They have only recently come into wealth. I would say they are a power-couple. But until Chelsea or their grandchildren start pursuing political power, the Clintons are NOT a dynasty.

And there was no false drama. Snark from you, maybe.
Add Chelsea to the mix and you have a beginning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 12:03 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjay51 View Post
Add Chelsea to the mix and you have a beginning.
So, one day in the far, far future, the Clintons might be considered a dynasty, but not today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 01:54 PM
 
4,582 posts, read 3,408,767 times
Reputation: 2605
Most of the bright young minds that would guide the Democrat party in the future have long since been sold off as parts by Planned Parenthood.

Kamella Harris? Sorry, there is an evolving scandal in CA today over Gov Brown using state geologists on taxpayer time to determine the value of fracked oil under some property holdings of his and Harris may be part of the cover up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,019,978 times
Reputation: 62204
What's John Edwards doing these days? Who has he endorsed, Bernie or Hillary?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 03:09 PM
 
9,725 posts, read 15,172,833 times
Reputation: 3346
George Clooney, Matt Damon, Ben Affleck
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 03:24 PM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,556,977 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
So, one day in the far, far future, the Clintons might be considered a dynasty, but not today.
You did not specify a period of time. Nice back tracking.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 03:26 PM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,556,977 times
Reputation: 3602
Where are the democrats of the future?

Still in third world nations waiting to be illegal immigrants?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 03:41 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjay51 View Post
You did not specify a period of time. Nice back tracking.
Since the Clintons aren't a dynasty TODAY, I didn't have to backtrack. Maybe you're so busy future-tracking you lost track?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-05-2015, 04:25 PM
 
Location: Virginia
6,230 posts, read 3,609,008 times
Reputation: 8963
Jennifer Granholm, former Michigan governor and attorney general, in her fifties, attractive, used to have her own TV show. She can never be president because she was born in Canada to Canadian parents, but I could see a Dem president appointing her attorney general or something else.

CA Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, who famously married gay couples as mayor of San Francisco ten years ago. He's only in his late forties and is one of the most handsome men I've ever seen, politician or not. He wanted to be governor in 2010 but couldn't stop the Jerry Brown juggernaut; now he's already declared for the 2018 gubernatorial race. Born into money and political connections. Hitched his wagon to the Clintons a good while back--I'm sure he will expect some sort of office at the national level in return. If this guy doesn't have aspirations for the White House I'll eat my hat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top