Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-18-2016, 07:06 AM
 
4,808 posts, read 3,527,517 times
Reputation: 2319

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I'm guessing these are socialism you support. I often times find that to be the case.
I dont support socialism. You are a strange cat. You couldnt andwer a question directly if your life depended on it.

 
Old 01-18-2016, 07:06 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,131 posts, read 51,432,240 times
Reputation: 28388
New flash: we are already paying for health care. It is not a new program. You pay an insurer. Your employers plan is part of your compensation package. It is just a matter or where the money comes from and how efficient an NHS would be versus the current private insurer system we have. Worldwide experience in dozens of countries suggest that we would be paying significantly less in an NHS than we do now. I haven't looked at Sanders plan and won't because Sander is not going to be President. But it is high time that we get for profit insurance companies out of our health care delivery system.
 
Old 01-18-2016, 07:09 AM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,834,018 times
Reputation: 3544
Yes they are.

I see every bill my doctors submit, I see every payment they receive. And I've seen a lot of medical bills the last few years.
 
Old 01-18-2016, 07:09 AM
 
4,808 posts, read 3,527,517 times
Reputation: 2319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
New flash: we are already paying for health care. It is not a new program. You pay an insurer. Your employers plan is part of your compensation package. It is just a matter or where the money comes from and how efficient an NHS would be versus the current private insurer system we have. Worldwide experience in dozens of countries suggest that we would be paying significantly less in an NHS than we do now. I haven't looked at Sanders plan and won't because Sander is not going to be President. But it is high time that we get for profit insurance companies out of our health care delivery system.
We are capatlists, and this healthcare abortion is making someone lots of money.
If people dont like it, dont buy into it, pay cash and pay your fine/tax at the end of the year. And socialized medicine isnt free, as portrayed in EUROPE.
 
Old 01-18-2016, 07:10 AM
 
Location: annandale, va & slidell, la
9,267 posts, read 5,144,875 times
Reputation: 8471
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Bernie explains he will pay for it, my question is why is it bad to not pay for health care but not for wars?
OMG! Give it a rest. One has nothing to do with the other. Health care is not a right.
Just because you have found some fellow travelers that will chant your silly slogans doesn't make it true.
We're out here and we don't like your motives. Hope this helps.
 
Old 01-18-2016, 07:11 AM
 
21,519 posts, read 10,647,299 times
Reputation: 14178
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyegirl View Post
Well with any luck, Sanders can actually turn that Obamacare into Medicaid for all. Then you'll really lose your marbles. The fact that you can write such a ridiculous thing, like Trump knows ANYTHING about healthcare for the little people, tells me everything I need to know about you. Just another Trump supporter driving a Kia.
My question is, will people with cancer get the treatment they get now under private insurance? Will people be waiting years to get things like knee replacement surgery because it's not considered life threatening, as my British friend's father had to do? Even in the below article defending the British healthcare system, it shows the differences of health outcomes between the United States and Great Britain. More people survive cancer here than they do there.

Is public healthcare in the UK as sick as rightwing America claims? | Society | The Guardian

Quote:
The claim

Breast cancer kills 46% of its targets in Britain, compared with 25% in the US; prostate cancer kills 57% of the Britons it strikes, compared with 25% of American victims; Britain's heart attack fatality rate was 19.5% higher than America's in 2005 – Pacific Research Institute, a San Francisco-based thinktank


The response

Breast cancer does claim more lives, proportionally, here than in the US. According to the 2002 Globocan database run by the World Health Organisation's cancer advisers, 19.2 of every 100,000 Americans die of the disease, but 24.3 per 100,000 here die. On prostate cancer, a Lancet Oncology global study last year found that 91.9% of Americans with the disease were still alive after five years compared to just 51.1% in the UK. With heart attacks, 40% of Britons who suffer one die from it compared to 38% in the States – nowhere near the difference claimed.
 
Old 01-18-2016, 07:14 AM
 
Location: Sonoran Desert
39,131 posts, read 51,432,240 times
Reputation: 28388
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
That doesn't matter where my Mom and her husband are. Medicare patients (no matter the plan) aren't given appointments unless they pay a flat annual concierge fee (which is not reimbursed by Medicare) and are on the concierge list.

https://www.medicare.gov/coverage/concierge-care.html
There is nothing like that around here. Virtually every doc I had on my employer plan also accepts Medicare (with no added fees). Most people I know, though, actually have Medicare Advantage HMOs or supplements rather than plain Medicare. That adds a little to the cost each month. Anyway, if "Medicare for Everyone" was the national health plan, they would not have much choice.
 
Old 01-18-2016, 07:15 AM
 
Location: annandale, va & slidell, la
9,267 posts, read 5,144,875 times
Reputation: 8471
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
New flash: we are already paying for health care. It is not a new program. You pay an insurer. Your employers plan is part of your compensation package. It is just a matter or where the money comes from and how efficient an NHS would be versus the current private insurer system we have. Worldwide experience in dozens of countries suggest that we would be paying significantly less in an NHS than we do now. I haven't looked at Sanders plan and won't because Sander is not going to be President. But it is high time that we get for profit insurance companies out of our health care delivery system.
Not true. The free market based system is the most efficient and the most free. Socialism is dead.
 
Old 01-18-2016, 07:15 AM
 
Location: Chesapeake Bay
6,046 posts, read 4,834,018 times
Reputation: 3544
Quote:
Originally Posted by finalmove View Post
OMG! Give it a rest. One has nothing to do with the other. Health care is not a right.
Just because you have found some fellow travelers that will chant your silly slogans doesn't make it true.
We're out here and we don't like your motives. Hope this helps.
So war is a right and health care is not. Strange.
 
Old 01-18-2016, 07:16 AM
 
Location: Austin TX
11,027 posts, read 6,536,257 times
Reputation: 13259
Quote:
Originally Posted by katygirl68 View Post
My question is, will people with cancer get the treatment they get now under private insurance? Will people be waiting years to get things like knee replacement surgery because it's not considered life threatening, as my British friend's father had to do? Even in the below article defending the British healthcare system, it shows the differences of health outcomes between the United States and Great Britain. More people survive cancer here than they do there.

Is public healthcare in the UK as sick as rightwing America claims? | Society | The Guardian
I approached this very subject in another thread and came armed with data and legitimate links demonstrating the unfortunate side effect of socialized healthcare in Canada, the UK, and Australia. Each country has alliances set up to track wait times now. Many links in the last few pages of this thread.

https://www.city-data.com/forum/elect...e-sanders.html

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nor Cal Wahine View Post
Wait times are becoming so routine in Canada in fact that they have an alliance set up to track data and assist citizens.

Healthcare wait time information for patients in Canada

The UK is under fire for their wait times and has also set up an alliance to help citizens.

http://www.nhs.uk/choiceintheNHS/Rig...g%20times.aspx

Same story in Australia.

http://www.aihw.gov.au/publication-d...id=60129549064
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:49 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top