Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Indeed. She holds absolute contempt for average working Americans as demonstrated by her lack of care for the 10s of 1000s she plans to put out of work, because their jobs don't match her "agenda" for the USA.
She's pushed for 3 pointless wars, that have gotten 100s of 1000s killed including 1000s of Americans and she's amazingly detached from that debacle as well.
Anyone who would support this woman for president has to be as equally disgusted by their fellow Americans or completely brain dead.
Right! Right there is all the evidence you need that Hillary actually wants to hurt Americans, kill them if possible. That's her goal, just like Obama's was/is to ruin America. Don't even get started on Benghazi when we all knew Clinton saw that coming and wanted not only to have American troops die, but a U.S. ambassador as well! And the emails! To think Hillary thought to funnel those emails to our enemies without being found out to be the traitor she truly is! Hello?
Hell, who needs all this evidence anyway when Hillary's intentions in these regards are obvious!
Well..., uhh..., maybe not so obvious, since it really is hard to understand how Hillary plans to win election or capitalize on these criminal actions in a way that benefits her, but what does that matter either?
You really do have to be "brain dead" not to see all this as clear as day, or..., uhh..., err...
Her war on white men especially is going to cost her the election. She's lost this segment of society, and it's a huge segment, by very large numbers. Not even the percentage of women votes she's getting comes close to the male vote she has lost.
White males over 39 are the fastest shrinking demographic. This isn't 1950 any longer. This is going to be the most racially diverse election in US history, and thats terrible news for someone with such amazingly bad numbers with non-white voters like Trump. He's going to lose with women, Hispanics, African-Americans, Asians and millennials. Again, if you think Trump can win by only carrying white males in 2016 America, you are delusional. Just ask Romney how that went...
White males over 39 are the fastest shrinking demographic. This isn't 1950 any longer. This is going to be the most racially diverse election in US history, and thats terrible news for someone with such amazingly bad numbers with non-white voters like Trump. He's going to lose with women, Hispanics, African-Americans, Asians and millennials. Again, if you think Trump can win by only carrying white males in 2016 America, you are delusional. Just ask Romney how that went...
I keep reading these notions about racial division, still how Obama is the most racially divisive POTUS ever, but what always seems lacking is the substantiation of these claims with supportive data.
For example, by what measure is this race "the most racially diverse" as compared to Obama vs McCain or Obama vs Romney?
Not saying you are wrong, not sure, but curious how you are measuring or quantifying such "diversity."
I keep reading these notions about racial division, still how Obama is the most racially divisive POTUS ever, but what always seems lacking is the substantiation of these claims with supportive data.
For example, by what measure is this race "the most racially diverse" as compared to Obama vs McCain or Obama vs Romney?
Not saying you are wrong, not sure, but curious how you are measuring or quantifying such "diversity."
"The U.S. electorate this year will be the country’s most racially and ethnically diverse ever. Nearly one-in-three eligible voters on Election Day (31%) will be Hispanic, black, Asian or another racial or ethnic minority, up from 29% in 2012. Much of this change is due to strong growth among Hispanic eligible voters, in particular U.S.-born youth."
And these are very consistant with last weeks polls which show the battleground states neck and neck.
Let me say that I am not a Trump guy and don't believe these polls outright, but, Trump clearly has closed the gap to an exent whiles Clinton flounders.
We get it naysayers....to far out...right wing pollsters...within margin or error...Hilary has not had a bounce yet...
But it all still adds up to Hillary being a very weak candidate in her own right.
I keep reading these notions about racial division, still how Obama is the most racially divisive POTUS ever, but what always seems lacking is the substantiation of these claims with supportive data.
Race won't have any effect on this election and very few eligible voters care about it. For those that do, their vote is already baked in because we know where that's going.
People are worried about jobs, terrorism, illegals, security, and a future for their kids. There is only one candidate actually addressing these issues. The other is left with 1990s style race huckstering. Guess which one will win.
Just look at Hillary's issues and whole philosophy. Forget the personal garbage. She gets killed on issues. Look at her foreign policy as secretary of state, and diplomat to China.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Two polls now have Trump ahead
