An open letter to Mr Kahn from a military vet (weapons, constitutional)

[ambient]

Remember this?



If the Khan family supposedly used their son as a "political pawn", then why didn't the same conservatives condemn her for doing the same? Both lost sons in the line of duty; both had opinions and got up at the respective conventions and spoke.

[ELOrocks17]

Originally Posted by ambient

Remember this?



If the Khan family supposedly used their son as a "political pawn", then why didn't the same conservatives condemn her for doing the same?

Um...because Hillary is directly responsible for Mrs Smiths son dying, Trump had nothing to do with Mr Khans son dying. Hello?

[stevek64]

Originally Posted by ELOrocks17

Um...because Hillary is directly responsible for Mrs Smiths son dying, Trump had nothing to do with Mr Khans son dying. Hello?

If you continue making logical points such as this instead of practicing the liberal hot air method that is stinking up the media/forums these days at the current pathetic desperate level, you're going to make the liberal hype machine that permeates these forums call you a meanie soon.

And this interesting point to ponder:

[wall st kid]

Originally Posted by ambient

Remember this?



If the Khan family supposedly used their son as a "political pawn", then why didn't the same conservatives condemn her for doing the same? Both lost sons in the line of duty; both had opinions and got up at the respective conventions and spoke.

because hillary murdered smiths son but trump had nothing to do with khan man's son.....two different scenarios.

[wall st kid]

Originally Posted by ELOrocks17

Um...because Hillary is directly responsible for Mrs Smiths son dying, Trump had nothing to do with Mr Khans son dying. Hello?

great minds think alike i promise i didnt read your post before posting mine.

How's it feel to be legendarily great? (and you can ask me the same thing!)

[thecoalman]

Originally Posted by ambient

If the Khan family supposedly used their son as a "political pawn", then why didn't the same conservatives condemn her for doing the same? Both lost sons in the line of duty; both had opinions and got up at the respective conventions and spoke.

Trump had nothing to do with the death of either individual, in both cases Hillary has some responsibility in particular where Benghazi is concerned.

[UB50]

Originally Posted by ELOrocks17

Um...because Hillary is directly responsible for Mrs Smiths son dying, Trump had nothing to do with Mr Khans son dying. Hello?

Mike Pence did exactly what Hillary did. Hello?

[lilyflower3191981]

Both have been used by political parties. So meh.

Both parents lost their sons, both have the right to express their sorrow. Both responses can be a little bit irrational.

I view both of them as grieving parents, nothing more. Hope they can move on from this tragedy without putting false hope in candidates who will eventually let them down.

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by ambient

Remember this?

I remember that, and I remember four years of relentless politicizing of the death of ambassador Stevens and the three others.

[Finn_Jarber]

Originally Posted by thecoalman

Trump had nothing to do with the death of either individual, in both cases Hillary has some responsibility in particular where Benghazi is concerned.

No one blamed him for the death.