Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She's a hypocrite Cali as you don't go defending women's rights and set such a poor example. Also Ms Machado is lying her butt off about Trump - he actually encouraged her to lose the weight. The Miss Universe organization wanted to take the title away from her and Donald said no -
She's a hypocrite Cali as you don't go defending women's rights and set such a poor example.
Explain why she's a hypocrite. Don't just parrot right wing talking points.
Think for yourself, and tell us why its hypocritical for a woman to stay in a relationship after infidelity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by xray731
Also Ms Machado is lying her butt off about Trump - he actually encouraged her to lose the weight.
I trust Ms. Machado's claims over those of Trump, who is incapable of telling the truth, and is on record calling her "a Miss Piggy". Machado is a well known actress in Latin America with a squeaky clean image.
And seriously; if Trump is so desperate as to be fighting former beauty queens, he's already lost the election.
This.
There is enormous risk in going there because he's far from clean himself.
It's guaranteed she'll label him a hypocrite and throw it back in his face.
It's a subject best avoided.
No, she won't. When he goes low, she'll go high. It makes him look all the more a fool.
yes, her marriage/her choice. But not pro-woman unless pro-woman only means making choice. But given most feel it's not so black and white, I think most people would say "pro choice" does not equal making choices that enable a cheating husband/getting embarrassed on a world stage while one's husband cheats in the WH and stays with him, ie enabling this using behavior.
As for "liking her", this isn't high school. I not a "team D or R person"/blindly pick by those metrics. I judge people on their character/behavior and just on this regard alone, correct, I find her to be not at all a nice or decent person and a liar. I ask myself the following......would I ever be friends/trust a person like her/think said person can do a good job if I were hiring them for a specific job? My answer.....absolutely no way in h*ll. And that's goes for any politician for that matter really for I feel they all lie and have proven to me to be inept for the most part/self serve/serve the money but she's at the top of the sleazy category in my view and the view of many simply because of her actions.
The prevalence of marital infidelity is extensive. Look to the left, look to the right at Church, your job, the folks on line with you at KMart, your relatives at Thanksgiving dinner, perhaps in your marriage. Sex between adults whether they are married or not is no doubt underreported. People choose to forgive or not. People choose to allow their partners to be free as well. Its not our place to judge either way. You simply don't like her and that is why you judge her admit it. Its that simple. But hope you judge your aunts, parents, neighbors, aunts, uncles, bosses, pastors with the same standard cause it happens everywhere. Its a very personal issue no one has the right to judge that.
One aspect of being pro-woman is being able to make the choice that is best for her. Her life; her marriage; her decision. .. That is being pro-woman. End of story.
Once read an interview where a widow was asked if she knew of her recently departed husband's dalliances with other women.
She said she did and that it hurt her. But that she made the decision to stay with him because she would rather have 50% of the most fascinating man she'd ever known than a 100% of any other man she'd ever met.
That has stuck with me.
Clinton's decision, just as any other woman's decision on this matter, is her business, not anyone else's.
I think he might because he is dumb as a rock but Kellyanne might find a way to convince him not to do so.
Trump's mistake is thinking everybody thinks like he does. Trump is very old fashioned and thinks women only care about being happily married. He thinks Hillary is gonna be offended if her husband is exposed as a cheater on national TV. Trump cannot take any criticism, he never had to because if someone criticized him he would fire them or stop doing business with them. He thinks Hillary thinks like him and she doesn't. Hillary has been in the political arena since the 70's and has been criticized forever. She had to swallow her pride in order to keep her husband in office. She knows how to control herself in the public eye. She is not gonna fall apart because Trump brings up the Lewinsky oral sex incident. If he does that, he is gonna look like a bully and might actually help her.
Another thing, Clinton is already a 70 woman, she is not in her 30's or 40's like when this cheating scandals broke out. At that point in life, women don't give a crap about their cheating husbands. She is not gonna be personally offended about being exposed for something that happened so many years ago.
Is Trump stupid enough to bring up Bill Clinton's history with women in a debate ?
Drumpf is furious after the beating he took Monday night.
My bet is that the next "debate" which is actually a town hall meeting, will allow him to really open mouth and deeply insert foot.
"The second presidential debate will take the form of a town meeting, in which half of the questions will be posed directly by citizen participants and the other half will be posed by the moderator based on topics of broad public interest as reflected in social media and other sources. The candidates will have two minutes to respond and there will be an additional minute for the moderator to facilitate further discussion. The town meeting participants will be uncommitted voters selected by the Gallup Organization."
No doubt he'll try to bring up Bill & Monica, Benghazi, and every other deflated "scandal" from the past 23 years in an adolescent attempt to "get even."
He can't help himself. He rises to the bait each and every time. Hillary will reel him in again as he blusters and bloviates on long dead topics that only the deplorables will see as relevant.
After a second drubbing, he may not even show up for the 3rd round on Oct 19th. Even though it's on his home field: Fox News.
Here's some clarity. There isn't a woman in the world who feels obligated to be nice to her husband's mistress. Not Ivanka, not Hillary. Anyone who suggests otherwise is a partisan hack.
Exactly Women never side with mistresses unless they are the mistresses themselves so the only votes Donald can gain with that is Gennifer Flowers' and possibly Monica's Lewinsky's.
Exactly Women never side with mistresses unless they are the mistresses themselves so the only votes Donald can gain with that is Gennifer Flowers' and possibly Monica's Lewinsky's.
I believe Gennifer Flower has already said she's voting for Clinton.
And who cares if you don't like it, or agree with it, or blah blah blah......
Remember, hillary dodged sniper fire and remember romney had not paid taxes in the last 10 years....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Is Trump stupid enough to bring up Bill Clinton's history with women in a debate ?
Women never side with mistresses unless they are the mistresses themselves so the only votes Donald can gain with that is Gennifer Flowers' and possibly Monica's Lewinsky's.
