Real Clear Politics Has Uncovered Yet Another Tax Law Violation by Trump Foundation (Iran, security)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hillary sells 20% of the US uranium production for donations to the Clinton Foundation, and hundreds of thousands paid to Bill, and you crazy dems are talking about a speech Trump gave to some conservative group.
So, with all these laws he has broken, why hasn't Obamas IRS gone after him?
Excellent question. The answer is, if there was something to it, they would have already nailed Trump to the wall because they are in desperation mode. I am sure Obama had the IRS scanning every item of Trump's tax returns for over a year now. As we know, Obama has used the IRS as his personal gestapo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lol-its-good4U
I didn't read the links but I heard about this.
The campaign IS cooperating with their inquiry = nothing to hide, nothing will come of this.
Desperation will be the DNC/liberals/anti-Trump people undoing as most of the American citizens are seeing the BS of all this.
I agree the stench of desperation is so thick that no one can deny it. IF there was anything to nail Trump on, they have had a year. Now, we get a lot of wordplay in the article titles, "suspected" "alleged" etc. Most of the stuff is trumped or flat out lies. I guess they don't know the story about the boy that cried "wolf" too many times.
Hillary sells 20% of the US uranium production for donations to the Clinton Foundation, and hundreds of thousands paid to Bill, and you crazy dems are talking about a speech Trump gave to some conservative group.
Seriously, WTF
Seriously why post such nonsense?
I realize that Kellyanne says Trump can't be held accountable for telling lies because he doesn't check to see whether things are true or not before saying them, but C-D discussions would be ever so much more productive if folks would check first before hitting "submit."
Clinton did not sell 20% of U.S uranium production.
State was one of nine government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal. State was not the ultimate authority. Plus, there’s simply no proof of any quid pro quo.
The Kremlin’s 2010 purchase of a controlling stake in Uranium One had to be approved by the nine members of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States which includes the Secretary of State, but also the Secretaries of the Treasury (who is the chairman of the committee), Defense, Justice, Commerce, Energy and Homeland Security as well as the the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy. The deal also had to be okayed by the independent Nuclear Regulatory Commission as well as Utah’s nuclear regulator.
The State Department’s principal representative on the committee, Jose Fernandez, told Time that Clinton "never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter."
As Russia doesn’t have the licenses to export uranium outside the United States, though they may own the company, they cannot export the uranium. It is likely the Kremlin was more interested in Uranium One’s assets in Kazakhstan, the world’s largest producer."
Why on earth would the United States allow the transfer of a uranium company?
"United States was still seeking to "reset" its relationship with Russia and trying to get the Kremlin on board with its Iran nuclear deal."
"United States doesn’t actually produce all that much uranium (about 2 percent in 2015) and is actually a net importer of the chemical, according to Jeffrey Lewis, a nuclear nonproliferation expert at Middlebury Institute."
"Russia’s purchase of the company "had as much of an impact on national security as it would have if they set the money on fire," said Lewis. "That’s probably why (CFIUS and the NRC ) approved it."
For a breakdown of the nine investors and their donations to the Clinton Foundation, check out:
So, with all these laws he has broken, why hasn't Obamas IRS gone after him?
You don't seem to be aware that the federal government had gone after Trump many times already.
The earliest case we know of is the US Dept of Justice suing Trump for Anti-trust violation in 1988. Trump lost the case and had to pay $750,000 in penalty and fines.
Hillary sells 20% of the US uranium production for donations to the Clinton Foundation, and hundreds of thousands paid to Bill, and you crazy dems are talking about a speech Trump gave to some conservative group.
Seriously, WTF
Hillary DID NOT.
She was not part of the decision process and EIGHT OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AGREED to the deal.
Stop spreading lies. It only makes right-wingers look dishonest and desperate.
.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
