Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I figure that ALL email, texts and similar are open to anyone that wants to find them. There are ways to communicate securely but they do not involve electronics in any way.
Maybe I'm a tinfoil hatter, but how do we know that the elections aren't already rigged? The last time Hillary Clinton ran for president, she was all the way at the bottom. And now she's the democratic nomination. How does that even happen?
There were plenty of other perfectly sane candidates earlier in the election, yet we are left with these two?!?
Don't any of you find it odd that there have been no hacking of Republican computers: RNC, candidates, Trump, etc. I doubt that the RNC, for instance, had 'better security' than the DNC. The whole thing strikes me as odd.
Don't any of you find it odd that there have been no hacking of Republican computers: RNC, candidates, Trump, etc. I doubt that the RNC, for instance, had 'better security' than the DNC. The whole thing strikes me as odd.
The RNC may very well have better security than the DNC IMO. Also, if the hackers are specifically focusing on the DNC and not the RNC that is why the RNC has not been hacked. What's the point? Especially if they are trying to have a say in our electoral process against the Democratic candidate.
The thing that concerns me a bit more is that the Dems, that have a good chance at being in complete control of everything in the country, are beginning to lay out an anti Russia narrative in their propaganda.
The rhetoric is increasing on both sides, ours and theirs.
This has been happening for a while and has little to do with our political parties. It is mostly Russia flexing its power for various reasons from legitimate security concerns (they were not going to lose their naval base in Crimea and I do not blame them) and to garner internal support.
The RNC may very well have better security than the DNC IMO. Also, if the hackers are specifically focusing on the DNC and not the RNC that is why the RNC has not been hacked. What's the point? Especially if they are trying to have a say in our electoral process against the Democratic candidate.
Just because we do not know about any hacking does not mean it has not happened.
The Trump campaign is not mentioning the Russians because the Donald expects to receive billions of dollars invested by the Russians in his "All Trump All the Time" post election TV network. I will be watching to see what happens when it fails and the Donald tries to stiff those investors.
IT consultants I've spoken with have said that Russia and China and the USA are the top 3 countries that hack other nations. N. Korea also hacks a lot - they were behind the Sony hacks in the recent past.
I am not so sure that the Sony hack was North Korea. I believe it was an inside job.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
