Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Voting for Beto or Cruz?
Beto 67 41.61%
Cruz 89 55.28%
Neither-waiting for magical unicorn to run 5 3.11%
Voters: 161. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 11-05-2018, 11:10 AM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,411,792 times
Reputation: 8966

Advertisements

Another swing and a miss for Veritas. This is one of their biggest nothingburgers yet.

 
Old 11-05-2018, 02:53 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,483,864 times
Reputation: 14398
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-w...pes-for-a-wave
In Texas...voters between the ages of 18 and 39 made up a little less than a quarter of the total Texas early vote; four years ago, those voters made up just 13 percent of the electorate.
...
"The real question is, have the polling models gotten the turnout right and accounted for the surge in voter registration we've seen among millennials and younger voters," Siegfried said. "If they haven't, then this could potentially be a gigantic tsunami."
 
Old 11-05-2018, 03:04 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,013,481 times
Reputation: 62204
Neither. I live in Tennessee.
 
Old 11-05-2018, 03:05 PM
 
17,440 posts, read 9,266,927 times
Reputation: 11907
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigCreek View Post
Lies and scare tactics again. O"Rourke's campaign made a charitable donation to a non-profit organization which assists immigrants who are already here.

Nothing whatsoever to do with those making their way north.

Good grief, did no one ever teach any of your Trumpites how to do basic research?? Or is it that being honest is the real problem, rather than not researching your fake claims?
Yeah .... I saw Beto's response to this video.

1). He fired the guy in the Video called a "staffer" -- that "staffer" was in charge of this Field Operations, based in the Beto El Paso Headquarters. I guess Beto was against him "giving to charity" - so he got fired. Anyone really buying that?

2). Beto cited a group of Hondurans that arrived in El Paso this last Friday - they "charitably spent $300" on Diapers, Baby Wipes, Fruit and granola bars. Somehow he ignored that the Video was made weeks ago about an even that happened the day the Video was released. He also ignored that the 2 Field Organizers (did he fire the woman also?) stated clearly that they were breaking law, "nobody needs to know", using the Money for bus trips, giving them rides in their Campaign vehicles and hiding the expenses under "halloween treats" expenditure.

Claiming it was for "charity" was a good idea ..... failing to come up with a more believable story in their Panic was an error. I guess that Beto is not aware that there is a record of those Pre-paid cards and a record on how/where the card was used.

I expect we will eventually find out a LOT more about this.
 
Old 11-05-2018, 03:09 PM
 
2,956 posts, read 2,342,545 times
Reputation: 6475
People believe this ****. Wow
 
Old 11-05-2018, 03:13 PM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,013,481 times
Reputation: 62204
Quote:
Originally Posted by lovecrowds View Post
Wow, speechless. Beto O'Rourke's campaign staffers talking about money and vans for the caravan's.

So many laws likely being violated in just 23 minutes among Beto O'Rourke's staffers.

If this 23 minute hidden camera story doesn't show their true agenda, I don't know what does.

https://www.projectveritasaction.com/2018/11/01/beto/

"No one needs to know" according to one campaign staffer

“I just hope nobody that’s the wrong person finds out about this.” said another
How stupid would that be as a strategy? Just what Republicans would need to see before they voted - hordes of invaders acting nutso at the border.
 
Old 11-05-2018, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,218 posts, read 22,361,490 times
Reputation: 23858
Today, 5 November, the 538 has the most recent Texas poll, taken today, as being dead even between Cruz and O'Rourke.
49-49% for each, with a Libertarian getting the rest.
 
Old 11-05-2018, 07:17 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,483,864 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by banjomike View Post
Today, 5 November, the 538 has the most recent Texas poll, taken today, as being dead even between Cruz and O'Rourke.
49-49% for each, with a Libertarian getting the rest.

If Beto won, this would be the #1 biggest shocker race of the mid-terms.

Seems he is getting momentum at the last minute with polls. Wondering if the pollsters are changing up their expected voter demographic after seeing the early voter demographics.


https://www.inquisitr.com/5149154/fi...Search+Results
 
Old 11-06-2018, 12:45 AM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,218 posts, read 22,361,490 times
Reputation: 23858
Quote:
Originally Posted by sware2cod View Post
If Beto won, this would be the #1 biggest shocker race of the mid-terms.

Seems he is getting momentum at the last minute with polls. Wondering if the pollsters are changing up their expected voter demographic after seeing the early voter demographics.


https://www.inquisitr.com/5149154/fi...Search+Results
All the pollsters are being very cautious this year. 2016 showed some big flaws in the way the polls were conducted, and those flaws were invisible before. For a business that depends on accuracy, 2016 rattled them to their bones.

2 years later, the industry is still trying to discover what went wrong with methodology that had always been reliable before. They all used the same basic methodology except for a few outliers, and some of the most reliable methods failed for reasons that are still mysterious in part. Some reasons became evident very quickly.

The polling industry is the only predictive tool in politics, and the most important thing to a politician a poll can deliver is bad news. Every candidate must know when he's getting into trouble as early and accurately as possible if he hopes to win.
When the polls fail to deliver the bad news, a candidate is flying blind. He doesn't know where the lurking problems are that can defeat him.

It's going to be interesting to see how the polling practices have changed this election. I tend to think that 2018 is the test for them all, and we will be seeing more polling after the election than ever before.

It's a sort of "Doctor, heal thyself." thing. If the doctor can't heal himself, who else can?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top