Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-22-2008, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Missouri
3,645 posts, read 4,926,438 times
Reputation: 768

Advertisements

Just what many have said. The MSM has been in the tank for Obama from the beginning and now there is proof.

Study: McCain coverage mostly negative - Michael Calderone - Politico.com

Study: McCain coverage mostly negative

The good news for John McCain? He's now receiving as much attention from the national media as his Democratic rival. The bad news? It’s overwhelmingly negative.

Just 14 percent of the stories about John McCain from the conventions through the final presidential debate were positive in tone, according to a study released today, while nearly 60 percent were negative—the least favorable coverage of any of the 4 candidates on the ticket.

The study, by The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism, a non-partisan journalism watchdog organization, examined 2,412 stories from 43 newspapers and cable news shows in the six-week period beginning just after the conventions and ending with the final presidential debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-22-2008, 01:48 PM
 
Location: Grand Rapids Metro
8,882 posts, read 19,854,193 times
Reputation: 3920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous Political Junky View Post
Just what many have said. The MSM has been in the tank for Obama from the beginning and now there is proof.

Study: McCain coverage mostly negative - Michael Calderone - Politico.com

Study: McCain coverage mostly negative

The good news for John McCain? He's now receiving as much attention from the national media as his Democratic rival. The bad news? It’s overwhelmingly negative.

Just 14 percent of the stories about John McCain from the conventions through the final presidential debate were positive in tone, according to a study released today, while nearly 60 percent were negative—the least favorable coverage of any of the 4 candidates on the ticket.

The study, by The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism, a non-partisan journalism watchdog organization, examined 2,412 stories from 43 newspapers and cable news shows in the six-week period beginning just after the conventions and ending with the final presidential debate.
Why would the media cover a lousy campaign in a positive tone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2008, 01:50 PM
 
Location: WA
4,242 posts, read 8,775,391 times
Reputation: 2375
Study: McCain campaign is mostly negative
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2008, 01:51 PM
 
12,772 posts, read 7,977,382 times
Reputation: 4332
Quote:
Originally Posted by magellan View Post
Why would the media cover a lousy campaign in a positive tone?
Agreed. Two bad candidates they should both get bad coverage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2008, 01:51 PM
 
Location: Alexandria, VA
1,774 posts, read 2,809,087 times
Reputation: 213
When you campaign positively you get positive coverage. And when you do it negatively......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2008, 01:55 PM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,951,643 times
Reputation: 2618
I think people have missed the point. It is more so that the media is in bed with their candidate. Maybe not mutually, but they slant to their side and it has been something that has been pointed out for quite a while. Not surprised the bobble heads would come in and defend it to the last breath. That's why they call them "sheep".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2008, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,538,911 times
Reputation: 24780
Talking Surprise, surprise!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Anonymous Political Junky View Post
Just what many have said. The MSM has been in the tank for Obama from the beginning and now there is proof.

Study: McCain coverage mostly negative - Michael Calderone - Politico.com

Study: McCain coverage mostly negative

The good news for John McCain? He's now receiving as much attention from the national media as his Democratic rival. The bad news? It’s overwhelmingly negative.

Just 14 percent of the stories about John McCain from the conventions through the final presidential debate were positive in tone, according to a study released today, while nearly 60 percent were negative—the least favorable coverage of any of the 4 candidates on the ticket.

The study, by The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism, a non-partisan journalism watchdog organization, examined 2,412 stories from 43 newspapers and cable news shows in the six-week period beginning just after the conventions and ending with the final presidential debate.

Now, there's a study with some teeth in it!

Candidate's campaign goes exclusively negative, bashing the opponent with discredited claims and innuendo, while offering nothing in the way of vision or a central message of its own, and then acts shocked, SHOCKED that its press coverage tends to be <guess what?> negative!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2008, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Missouri
3,645 posts, read 4,926,438 times
Reputation: 768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
I think people have missed the point. It is more so that the media is in bed with their candidate. Maybe not mutually, but they slant to their side and it has been something that has been pointed out for quite a while. Not surprised the bobble heads would come in and defend it to the last breath. That's why they call them "sheep".
You are right of course!!! Rep to you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2008, 02:01 PM
 
Location: Austin
4,105 posts, read 8,289,450 times
Reputation: 2134
Study: John McCain mostly negative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-22-2008, 02:05 PM
 
2,857 posts, read 6,725,789 times
Reputation: 1748
It's to be expected. In 2004 the coverage of Kerry became negative as he fell behind in the polls. He was criticized for every bad turn in his campaign. When a campaign is managed as badly as McCain's has been, there's just not a lot of positive things to say.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top