Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have yet to come across any retractions a newspaper had to make because they were 'lies' or denials from the Govenor's Office because they were lies. I believe he is/was as involved as reported.
I have yet to come across any retractions a newspaper had to make because they were 'lies' or denials from the Govenor's Office because they were lies. I believe he is/was as involved as reported.
The Los Angeles Times does not print retractions when they are caught lying. When they printed that Sarah was unaware Africa was a continent, they knew it was a lie. When the New York Times recently exposed the Los Angeles Times lie, they still did not print a retraction. So the lack of a retraction is no indiction that they are telling the truth. Remember, being a leftist freak means you never have to say you're sorry.
This savage should be stopped at all costs. He is the true source of corruption and bad influence of Sarah Palin in Alaska. It's clear that he wears the pants in that family and is clearly influencing policy through his wife in the Governor's office. Is that what you want America- another oil-tied, manipulative Republican family?
'This savage', huh? I wonder if I could get a way with referring to a certain politician as a 'savage'.
The Los Angeles Times does not print retractions when they are caught lying. When they printed that Sarah was unaware Africa was a continent, they knew it was a lie. When the New York Times recently exposed the Los Angeles Times lie, they still did not print a retraction. So the lack of a retraction is no indiction that they are telling the truth. Remember, being a leftist freak means you never have to say you're sorry.
Oh, I get it. I'm suppose to believe someone whose posts are right wing, self serving crap, filled with hatred of all that is not so far to the right as to shame the KKK, because he or she says they speak the truth and everything else is bull scat. Gotcha!
You think so? I don't know. He just doesn't appear all that bright or articulate to me. Most of the time he just vacantly stares into space and looks lost.
The Los Angeles Times does not print retractions when they are caught lying. When they printed that Sarah was unaware Africa was a continent, they knew it was a lie. When the New York Times recently exposed the Los Angeles Times lie, they still did not print a retraction. So the lack of a retraction is no indiction that they are telling the truth. Remember, being a leftist freak means you never have to say you're sorry.
The NYT printed no such expose. Now you're lying. If they did, provide a link.
You've been used, and you aren't even smart enough to know it.
Ha. So you're one of the people who either didn't read, or who couldn't comprehend, that article. The Palin-Africa blunder is NOT what was exposed as a hoax. The IDENTITY OF THE SOURCE was the hoax. Some idiot pretended to be the McCain advisor who leaked the story, and it was later found out that he wasn't a McCain advisor at all.
The story itself was not proven to be a hoax. As it stands, there is still an anonymous McCain advisor who leaked the story to the press, that Palin didn't know Africa is a continent. That gaffe was not proven in any way, shape or form to be false. The source is still out there, remaining anonymous. The guy who claimed to be the mcCain advisor who leaked the story, turned out not be a McCain advisor. His identity was false...not the fact that Palin didn't kow that Africa's a continent.
Quote:
The hoax was limited to the identity of the source in the story about Palin -- not the FOX News story itself. While Palin has denied that she mistook Africa for a country, the veracity of that report was not put in question by the revelation that Eisenstadt is a phony.
Say I called up MSNBC and claimed to be the McCain advisor who leaked the story, and MSNBC reported such. Then, say it was later discovered that I was not the anonymous source, and MSNBC had to retract the story they reported about me being the source. It would make the identity of the source a hoax, but it would not invalidate the Palin-Africa geographical gaffe at all.
Who's the smart one now, genius boy? Learn to read and comprehend, then you can join in the intelligent adult discussion.
You've been used, and you aren't even smart enough to know it.
Reading is fundamental!! So why not try it? I beg you!!! Start by reading the actual article that you linked to!!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
