Why do so many put so much trust in a man who has done nothing? (liberal, speech)

[ELOrocks17]

Originally Posted by BobKovacs

Do you intend to whine about Obama until the 2012 elections, or might we see you cease your whining after January 20th when he's "The Real President"??

Lets take a "wait and see" approach...Maybe YOU can cease your praise until he actually does something to deserve it...whadda you think?

[BobKovacs]

Originally Posted by ELOrocks17

Lets take a "wait and see" approach...Maybe YOU can cease your praise until he actually does something to deserve it...whadda you think?

I haven't praised him for anything- but you're writing him off as useless before he's even been put into the chair behind the desk. Seems a little short-sighted to me.

[ELOrocks17]

Originally Posted by BobKovacs

I haven't praised him for anything- but you're writing him off as useless before he's even been put into the chair behind the desk. Seems a little short-sighted to me.

When have I ever said that I wrote him off? I simoly state that he has no experience, no track record and questionable associations...and why so many people want him "Sainted" before he has done anything..thats all

[EinsteinsGhost]

Originally Posted by ELOrocks17

Huh?
What reality are you talking about? The man is NOT THE PRESIDENT YET! At this point there are no "realities"

Nobody has said he is. So get over it. You can still talk about realities like the ones that bothered you.

[ELOrocks17]

Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost

Nobody has said he is. So get over it. You can still talk about realities like the ones that bothered you.

Future realities are called SPECULATION, quit trying to pass them off as fact.

[bluescityleon]

Originally Posted by ELOrocks17

I am refering of course to Barak Obama. Can someone please tell me what he has done that makes you so sure he is going to be a great President?

...to answer you.....there are different answers.......Many just think it was time for change....it was very expected...it was a surprise the repubublicans did as well as they did. My quuestion to you is who really picked B.O.
.

[yman97]

Of could have said the same thing about George W. Bush but that's besides the point. I would argue that career politicians that have much more experience are, often times, ineffective.

[ELOrocks17]

Originally Posted by yman97

Of could have said the same thing about George W. Bush but that's besides the point. I would argue that career politicians that have much more experience are, often times, ineffective.

But they know people, and how to play the game and who does what--all Obama knows is that what time Oprah is on TV

[omle]

Originally Posted by mrbob

Don't get your panties all tied up in a knot - chill out Dude!!!

You'll just have to be patient and SEE what he does as President - and you don't have to wait much longer - thank God!!!

The poster asked a question. Was not hysterical as you are.

Yes, we shall see what Obama brings. It would have been good if the MSM vetted him as they do others. Oh, well, they, as you have a crush.

A crush usually ends up poorly. You know that?

[ovcatto]

Originally Posted by ELOrocks17

But they know people, and how to play the game and who does what--all Obama knows is that what time Oprah is on TV

Well then my next door neighbor is fully qualified for office, but I sincerely doubt that she knows how to run a campaign to win against two established political machines, and I doubt that her ability to assemble a cabinet as well received as Obamas.

Further more, I doubt that her religious viewing of Oprah would have enabled her to not only withstand some 30 debates against the biggest heavy hitters in politics, but to convince 64 million voters that they possessed substantial knowledge of the issue confronting the nation.

And, I haven't even touched on legislative records and the fact that the man is a Constitutional scholar. So, please spare us the ad hominem arguments.