Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Number 5 in the op and the lady in blue in Sixy's post are built the same.
They appear to be the same size.
#5 looks like she has an apple shape with more extra weight in her belly/waist. She looks short-waisted to me.
I don't find the apple shape appealing at all.
#5 looks like she has an apple shape with more extra weight in her belly/waist. She looks short-waisted to me.
I don't find the apple shape appealing at all.
Yep, the girl in blue has more of an hourglass figure. Again, ! She's gorgeous IMO.
I would pick this^ out those photos, but with a little more meat (preferably in her butt). Nothing to me is more appealing than a nice arse and voluptuous curves. Ive had ultra-fit, toned, not so fit woman in my life and I find I like the not so fit women; they just feel better not to say i would kick a fit woman out of bed
Somewhere in between blue bikini and miss america snaps.
I don't like super ab definition on the female form when just standing there. Not a lot of people have nicely shaped muscles in that area and it just looks like crooked muscles on a lot of people. Maybe its all the bad self tanner making the photo look off.
The blue bikini girl looks a little flabby. That probably doesn't look as good from the hip down or on the backside. Her arms kinda have that puffy dough look to them. She just has them turned in a slimming way.
Somewhere in between blue bikini and miss america snaps.
I don't like super ab definition on the female form when just standing there. Not a lot of people have nicely shaped muscles in that area and it just looks like crooked muscles on a lot of people. Maybe its all the bad self tanner making the photo look off.
The blue bikini girl looks a little flabby. That probably doesn't look as good from the hip down or on the backside. Her arms kinda have that puffy dough look to them. She just has them turned in a slimming way.
Not too soft and not too cut. Not built strait up and down or bony, but not extreme curves made of fatty tissue either.
I'm going to second the Raquel Welch photo, curvy,toned and not too muscular. Although I admire and respect the hard work that goes into developing the body of the women you see in the OP's first several pics, they are a little too defined in the muscles. This is just my 2 cents. Not a big fan of very defined abs on women as far as looks but I'm sure they worked hard for those.
^^^ Exactly my thoughts. You posted 4 links to photos of well toned, slim women who obviously spend lots of time admiring themselves, and then you post two links to pix of fat women who do not look very appealing in their skimpy outfits, concluding your post with a description of your own tall/slim body, that most likely is your goal and you are proud of it.
Now, what kind of replies you expect from us???
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
! She's gorgeous IMO.
not to say i would kick a fit woman out of bed
