U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-11-2014, 05:39 AM
 
Location: Elysium
5,821 posts, read 3,103,043 times
Reputation: 4046

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
You must either a female or a gay male.

It's one thing not to like a big booty but it's another thing for a heterosexual male to say that he would "throw up" at the sight of a woman with a big booty. I would have to seriously question that person's sexuality.
What we learn to be attractive depends upon how society views us and our mates. At one point of history and place it would be an anorexic super model and the models in a Sir Mix a Lot video would never work again. In any case the celebrity butts being discussed seem to deviant far from the human norm and going to far in either direction will cause someone to stand up and say the emperor has no clothes on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tofur View Post
Anyone can build muscle and pack on a little fat. That's all a booty is. Heavy squats, deadlifts and food.
While anyone can target a specific set of muscles to work on they can not change their distribution of fat. It might end up in a spot that is not socially acceptable and sexually attractive for their era.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-11-2014, 11:03 PM
 
Location: the Permian Basin
4,094 posts, read 2,827,888 times
Reputation: 5665
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieOlSkool View Post
How?
Inserts are artificial, not natural.

Don't overthink it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2014, 10:34 AM
 
2,181 posts, read 2,039,233 times
Reputation: 3138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiko View Post
What we learn to be attractive depends upon how society views us and our mates. At one point of history and place it would be an anorexic super model and the models in a Sir Mix a Lot video would never work again. In any case the celebrity butts being discussed seem to deviant far from the human norm and going to far in either direction will cause someone to stand up and say the emperor has no clothes on.



While anyone can target a specific set of muscles to work on they can not change their distribution of fat. It might end up in a spot that is not socially acceptable and sexually attractive for their era.

Booties are better off being mostly muscle anyway, and everyone can build muscle on their glutes. Get to squatting and lunging!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2014, 10:35 AM
 
10,339 posts, read 7,605,224 times
Reputation: 4513
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddieOlSkool View Post
Dude equates firm butt to big butt, which are VERY different things. I'm sure Jessica Biel's butt is super firm and can crush a pop can with a clench but if you at someone like Esther Baxter (Freek-a-leek) and you try and compare the two, Biel looks like a pancake butt girl.

Muscle insertions make ALL the difference. Girls with high glute insertions have a disadvantage in getting a big butt, just like guys with high gastroc insertions have a disadvantage at having big calves. It also tends to happen that longer femurs tend to lead to higher glute insertions. It isn't always the case, as some long legged women also can have very big round butts, but usually women with longer legs (especially longer thighs) tend to have a high glute insert to go with it. An exception to this is Southern European women who have long legs and can grow big butts, too.
This makes sense --- look how short Kim K's or Amber Rose's legs are. But I still think Kim K had fat transferred from her belly and waist area to her butt after her pregnancy. Amber Rose's butt looks more natural.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2014, 10:38 AM
 
10,339 posts, read 7,605,224 times
Reputation: 4513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiko View Post
What we learn to be attractive depends upon how society views us and our mates. At one point of history and place it would be an anorexic super model and the models in a Sir Mix a Lot video would never work again. In any case the celebrity butts being discussed seem to deviant far from the human norm and going to far in either direction will cause someone to stand up and say the emperor has no clothes on.



While anyone can target a specific set of muscles to work on they can not change their distribution of fat. It might end up in a spot that is not socially acceptable and sexually attractive for their era.
In the '50s women wore girdles (gasp!) in order to make their butts and that whole area as flat as possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-12-2014, 04:03 PM
 
4,801 posts, read 3,451,682 times
Reputation: 2568
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slowpoke_TX View Post
Inserts are artificial, not natural.

Don't overthink it.
It's the age of GOOGLE.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=muscle+insertion

Learn to use it some day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Fashion and Beauty
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2018, Advameg, Inc.

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top