Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Food and Drink
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-10-2013, 08:39 PM
 
1,105 posts, read 2,305,124 times
Reputation: 1074

Advertisements

another worry about a food that is both convenient and until recentently healthy. Now they find out its loaded with arsenic. What do people think? Does it bother you?

here is a article out of the Chicago Trib
Cooking tips to possibly lessen risk of arsenic in rice




    • 22.7K






Last month rice lovers got some bitter news.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Consumer Reports released studies showing "worrisome" levels of cancer-causing arsenic in many popular rices and rice products.



Ads by Google

Within days some doctors called for limiting rice consumption, especially in children. Consumer Reports suggested capping weekly servings to less than a cup of cooked rice for kids and about 11/2 cups of cooked rice for adults. And the Illinois Attorney General's office, which conducted its own tests on infant rice cereal, suggested watching how much rice cereal parents feed to babies.
The FDA, however, stopped short of advising a cap on rice consumption or even a limit on arsenic residues in rice. But it did say that the levels found have prompted the agency to prioritize further testing of about 1,000 more samples by the end of the year in order to come up with "science based" recommendations.
Critics of the Consumer Reports recommendations are quick to point out that no large-scale epidemiological study has yet isolated rice in arsenic as a source of cancer in humans. But no such study has ruled it out either. And all acknowledge that inorganic arsenic is classified as a Class A carcinogen, making high consumption levels a bad idea.
For those who don't eat much rice, this issue may be small potatoes. But Asian and Latino foods lovers and the nation's growing legions of gluten-free eaters depend on rice for a large part of their diet. So what are those groups supposed to do, especially those who feed kids, until the FDA comes out with official rice recommendations?
We talked to experts for some advice.
Rinse your rice thoroughly. The FDA cites several studies indicating that "thoroughly rinsing rice until the water is clear (four to six changes of water) reduced the total arsenic content by up to approximately 25-30 percent."
Check your municipal water report. "Make sure your local water supply does not have high levels of arsenic," says John Duxbury of Cornell University, who studies arsenic and rice. "If you do have high levels, washing can make it worse. But if you are under 10 parts per billion, it should help."
Cook and drain your rice sort of like pasta. "We say to use about 6 parts water to 1 part rice," says Michael Hansen, a senior staff scientist at Consumer Reports. "And then drain off the water after it's done." The FDA says that studies show rinsing and cooking in excess water can reduce total arsenic levels by 50 to 60 percent. "However, it should be noted that for enriched rice, rinsing will also likely reduce the amount of added nutrients," the agency said.
Choose aromatic rices. For those who are already fans of Indian basmati or Thai jasmine rices, the news is not so bad. According to the hundreds of recently released test results, aromatic rice varieties show the lowest levels of inorganic arsenic. Imported basmati and jasmine rices showed about half to one-eighth the level of arsenic as regular rices grown in the Southern U.S.

Ads by Google

Consider limiting brown rice consumption. From a nutritional and fiber standpoint, brown rice is tops, but because its bran remains intact it can also hold on to higher levels of arsenic, according to test results. Are the nutritional benefits worth the arsenic load? Hard to say at this point. But some test results indicate that brown rice from California and India have much lower levels of arsenic than brown rice from Southern U.S. states. For now, they may be the best choice.
Choose California. Of the domestic rices tested by Consumer Reports, California rices had lower levels of arsenic than those in other states. FDA rice results also indicated that some U.S. rice had lower levels of arsenic, but the data it released to the public did not specify states of origin.
Be careful when feeding babies rice cereal and rice milk. Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan's office conducted tests of rice cereals for babies that she announced all contained inorganic arsenic. Gerber recently released a statement announcing it now sources its baby cereal rice only from California. Still Consumer Reports advises that children do not drink rice milk and that infant rice cereal (1/4 cup) be served no more than once a day.
meng@tribune.com

Ads by Google
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-11-2013, 01:40 AM
 
Location: In a happy, quieter home now! :)
16,905 posts, read 16,130,561 times
Reputation: 75608
It's not just brown rice, it's white rice, too.

Not so much in instant rice, so I eat that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2013, 06:03 AM
 
Location: Islip,NY
20,937 posts, read 28,432,613 times
Reputation: 24925
There is always something in foods that's bad for you, I don't worry about it much, If I worried about everything I ate I'd be anorexic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2013, 06:39 AM
 
Location: New York
109 posts, read 155,521 times
Reputation: 71
It's the food that makes us sick. It contains chemicals that could poison as little by little without us knowing it. It's very alarming though we just can't tell whether this particular food is good to eat or could either harm us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-11-2013, 08:57 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,707,101 times
Reputation: 23295
Yeah that came out last year. From what I have been able to understand, as the volumne of contradictory data is overwhelming, organic rice from California is the best bet for limiting exposure.

Babies are the biggest risk as uptake in adults is minimal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 11:44 PM
 
26,143 posts, read 19,846,248 times
Reputation: 17241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angorlee
What do people think? Does it bother you?
Yes I love WHITE RICE and I really dont like eating stuff with posion in it!!!!!!


Does ORGANIC RICE also have this in it anyone know?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 11:45 PM
 
Location: Heart of Dixie
12,441 posts, read 14,878,548 times
Reputation: 28438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dude111 View Post
...Does ORGANIC RICE also have this in it anyone know?
Of course it does. The arsenic comes up through the water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2016, 12:26 AM
 
26,143 posts, read 19,846,248 times
Reputation: 17241
Thats scary!!!!!! (That is comes thru the water)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2016, 05:11 AM
 
Location: ☀️ SFL (hell for me-wife loves it)
3,671 posts, read 3,558,235 times
Reputation: 12351
Yeah, we saw this back when OP made the post, a few years back. We loved brown rice, but quit eating after report came out.
We do love the fragrant rices, and eat them at least 4 times a week. I also use them for pork fried rice.

Another tidbit I'll add about rice here. I read a study a few months back that said if you cook your rice, let it cool and reheat in a microwave, it will lose about 100 calories per serving. For those of you watching your waistlines, this is great news
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2016, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
19,441 posts, read 27,844,220 times
Reputation: 36113
Quote:
Originally Posted by TerraDown View Post

Another tidbit I'll add about rice here. I read a study a few months back that said if you cook your rice, let it cool and reheat in a microwave, it will lose about 100 calories per serving. For those of you watching your waistlines, this is great news
For others that read this and had doubts, it's true - but a little more complicated than TerraDown explained. The rice has to be cooked with coconut oil (ugh) and refrigerated, not just cooled.

Why Would Cooling Rice Make it Less Caloric? | Smart News | Smithsonian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Food and Drink
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:00 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top