U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-25-2011, 02:09 AM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
13,230 posts, read 18,050,646 times
Reputation: 14701

Advertisements

William Fulton is the mayor of Ventura, CA. He recently wrote a book called Romancing the Smokestack: How Cities and States Pursue Prosperity. In his book, he cited the work of Paul Gottlieb, an economist at Case Western Reserve University, in which he divided cities up into four categories based on their rates of population and economic growth. Some cities were above average in both regards, while other cities were below average in both regards. But he focused in on two groups in particular: those with above-average population growth and below-average economic growth ("population magnets"), and those with below-average population growth and above-average economic growth ("wealth builders"). Indeed, half the cities he studied fell into one of these two categories. Examples of each are listed below...

"Population magnets"

- Daytona Beach, FL
- El Paso, TX
- Knoxville, TN
- Las Vegas, NV
- Orlando, FL
- Portland, OR

"Wealth builders"

- Kansas City, MO
- Little Rock, AR
- Milwaukee, WI
- New Orleans, LA
- Pittsburgh, PA
- St. Louis, MO

This seems to mesh with the belief among some urban studies bloggers that our focus in the future should not be on quantity but quality. In other words, population growth is overrated while educational attainment and workforce development are underrated.

What say you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-25-2011, 02:23 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX/Chicago, IL/Houston, TX/Washington, DC
10,171 posts, read 12,865,260 times
Reputation: 4047
I like both in certain cities. For Chicago & Chicagoland I want to be seeing more of an economic gain rather than a population gain. A larger economical force with a seeming more "compact" population is a very deadly force. Just think of the Bay Area as an example, it is only 7.4 Million people compared to Chicago's 9.8 Million people, but it's Gross Domestic Product is $508 Billion (of course with mad inflation) & Chicago's is $526 Billion.

This is where cities like Los Angeles & Chicago make themselves look a bit less competitive, in my opinion when it comes to economical prowess. It looks really weak and is hardly worth bragging about at that point for those giant cities.

For a city like Houston, I want to see both. Population gains & economical increases in wealth. Houston is on track and is doing amazing, the best in Texas and the best in the South (among the largest cities) in terms of both wealth and economical prosperity.

For Austin, I want to see its economical wealth catch up to its population gain.

Washington DC is doing fine the way it is, cant really ask for too much more on that one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2011, 02:36 AM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
13,230 posts, read 18,050,646 times
Reputation: 14701
I wonder what the future holds for Atlanta. According to Gottlieb, Atlanta was above-average in both population and economic growth, but that article from New Geography that I created another thread on indicates that there are signs of weakness. Atlanta didn't "stay whole" in the last decade, so I wonder if it's lost some of its economic steam while the population growth continues unabated.

Pittsburgh is the ultimate paradox: population loss coupled with above-average economic growth. This illustrates the "addition by subtraction" that I'd been talking about. The population that has been leaving, whether by death or outmigration, has generally been less educated than the population that has stayed or migrated in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top