Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I never claimed to live in sacramento. mod cut: name calling edited
And SF is 85% kerry, not 69% Dallas was 75% Dallas liberals are still pro-business and understand basic economics.
So where is Sarmento, California? no such place
I already posted "official" polling numbers that indicate Kerry won 69% of votes in San Francisco [the highest in the nation}. Your statement is false & you know it since you refuse to cite\link your claim.
Apparently so........ As you can see, this turned into another Texas vs. California thing, which is sad because this is about cities that are similar in some way.
That's the point! Comparing any Texas city to California cities is ridiculous since there is no comparison [Austin & San Francisco is like comparing Memphis & New York City - nothing alike
That's the point! Comparing any Texas city to California cities is ridiculous since there is no comparison [Austin & San Francisco is like comparing Memphis & New York City - nothing alike
So you just ignore the small things that I mentioned in the first post......? That's fine, but like I said.... It's just a post.
I'll try to ignore the middle-school antics of Happ and offer something along the original topic:
Portland, OR - Denver, CO. I'd like to make comparisons between cities that aren't in states that are adjacent or nearly so, but region plays a huge influence on the setting and culture. Denver is obviously more mountainous, but both areas are traditionally free-spirited/granolas who like their urbanness but also enjoy a good nature playground.
Flagstaff, AZ and Bend, OR. High desert climate, elevation, growing smaller cities that sort of dominate their little regions of their respective states.
Texas and California could drop off into the Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific Ocean, respectively, and the rest of the country wouldn't blink. At least I wouldn't.
That's because there wouldn't be much of a country left to blink.
Austin is better in so many ways than the city of SF it's unbelievable. Cleaner, hotter looking people, much better music/nightlife, prettier other than the ocean. Nobody wants to live in a dirty, AIDS-infested place where everyone holds idiotic beliefs. San Jose >>>>SF and is where all the smart techies from Stanford/Berkeley end up, not irrelevant SF.
WOW!!! NEW AND EXCITING!!! YOU MUST BE ON TO SOMETHING!! WE SAN FRANCISCANS HAVE NEVER HEARD THAT ONE BEFORE!!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by happ
The insult is making any comparison between California & Texas [one example: progressives versus rednecks or beauty versus ugly or educated versus ignorant]. The list goes on & on & Texas is on the bottom of everything.
You never see Californians comparing themselves to Texans because that would be a distortion of the truth. Face it, Texas is a big fat nothing state that gave the world George Bush [enough said
WOW!!! NEW AND EXCITING!!! YOU MUST BE ON TO SOMETHING!! WE SAN FRANCISCANS HAVE NEVER HEARD THAT ONE BEFORE!!!!
Happ do you by any chance own a mirror.
Quit antagonizing, you big bully [and replace the Cubs\Indians with the Dodgers/Angels]
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
[and replace the Cubs\Indians with the Dodgers/Angels]
