Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-24-2009, 09:07 PM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,261 posts, read 21,753,123 times
Reputation: 10454

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grandstander View Post
The order was obeyed and the first two shots directed at the Confederate gathering were misses, but near enough to start a rush to safety by all save Polk. Refusing to allow his dignity to be stampeded, Polk clasped his hands together behind his back, and slowly strolled after the others. The thrid shot fired pierced him through his left arm, left rib cage and exited out the right rib cage and through his right arm. He was killed instantly. Shelby Foote described it as a "cannon sniping."

I believe the gun that killed Polk was personally layed by Hubert "leatherbreeches" Dilger, one of the finest gunners of the war.

Given Polk's laziness, insubordination and penchant for foolish decisions it probably would've been better for the Federal cause had Dilger missed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-22-2009, 11:18 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. area
62 posts, read 163,230 times
Reputation: 30
The Battle of Monitor and Merrimack (Battle of Hampton Roads)—a skirmish involving two inronclad ships and a handful of supporting vessels—was one of the most influential naval battles of the nineteenth century. After accounts of the battle between the new ironclad warships reached Europe, preeminent naval powers Great Britain and France both halted further construction of wooden-hulled ships. Virtually all new naval warship construction from that time on incorporated features of the U.S. ironclad warships.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2009, 02:00 PM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,658,013 times
Reputation: 11084
The Monitor and Merrimack are both named by their Union names. The Confederate ship was rechristened the CSS Virginia. Similiarly, there were battles referred to differently by Union and Confederate troops. Bull Run vs. Manasass. (I'm pretty sure that's the proper spelling--spell check doesn't like any of them.)

Also, General Lee placed first in his graduating class at West Point, but was defeated by a general who finished much lower, if not dead last.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2009, 02:59 PM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,261 posts, read 21,753,123 times
Reputation: 10454
The French and British had already built ironclad warships a couple of years before the American Civil War, indeed HMS Warrior was the first warship with an iron hull, the earlier French LaGloire being iron armor over a wood hull.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2009, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,530,289 times
Reputation: 7807
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
The Monitor and Merrimack are both named by their Union names. The Confederate ship was rechristened the CSS Virginia. Similiarly, there were battles referred to differently by Union and Confederate troops. Bull Run vs. Manasass. (I'm pretty sure that's the proper spelling--spell check doesn't like any of them.)

Also, General Lee placed first in his graduating class at West Point, but was defeated by a general who finished much lower, if not dead last.

Nearly every battle has different names from the two sides because the Union tended to name them after some local natural landmark, while the Confederates preferred something man-made.

That's how you got Bull Run/Mannassas (a railroad junction); Shiloh/Pittsburgh Landing; Stones River/Murfreesboro; Pea Ridge/Elkhorn Tavern, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-22-2009, 07:52 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
1,342 posts, read 3,245,990 times
Reputation: 1533
The history myth-buster, James Loewen, stubbed his toe on West Virginia. In "Lies Across America" he was complaining about the UDC putting up inappropriate Confederate memorials. He wrote "The Daughters are still at it; the only memory of Civil War soldiers at the Charles Town, West Virginia, courthouse is a pro-Confederate plaque the UDC affixed in 1986." The only problem though was that there was not a single company of Union soldiers from Jefferson County.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2009, 09:59 AM
 
Location: Brooklyn
40,050 posts, read 34,603,290 times
Reputation: 10616
Here's an unusual fact about the Civil War: it was cotton that actually prevented the Confederacy from gaining international diplomatic recognition as a sovereign state (which would have elevated the conflict into something more like a world war, given the continual maneuverings between Great Britain and France)...

The British government actually leaned in favor of the Confederacy (Abraham Lincoln was not their favorite head of state!), and besides, CSA could make things very uncomfortable in London by playing the cotton card. Coincidentally, in 1862 Egypt produced a bumper crop of cotton and Britain found itself in a position where reliance on Southern cotton wasn't an issue.

And so Britain never extended formal diplomatic recognition to CSA, which would likely have caused France to enter the conflict on the American side and turn the civil war international. Napoleon III didn't especially love us, but he certainly hated Britain more. He had a problem with President Lincoln opposing France's colonial incursions in Mexico--which Lincoln couldn't do much about, since he had problems of his own!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-26-2009, 04:12 AM
 
Location: Santa Monica
4,714 posts, read 8,461,458 times
Reputation: 1052
John Wayles Jefferson, likely a grandson of President (and Virginian) Thomas Jefferson by his slave Sally Hemings (who was 3/4 white), served in the Union Army out of Wisconsin.

John Wayles Jefferson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top