Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-12-2018, 03:02 PM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,213,138 times
Reputation: 29354

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matadora View Post
The problem with lay folks such as yourself is ...
Stop. Time for you to disclose if you are affiliated with this project or the rail industry. Clearly you do not consider yourself a "lay folk".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-12-2018, 03:08 PM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,213,138 times
Reputation: 29354
A new report estimates the Texas bullet train could cost taxpayers $21.5 billion and concludes that privately funded high speed rail is not a feasible mode of transit outside of the Northeastern United States.
The report from the Reason Foundation estimates that the proposed Texas Central Partners project between Dallas and Houston will run at a $537 million annual operating deficit over the its first 40 years of operations.


https://www.bizjournals.com/dallas/n...yers-21-5.html


From $12 billion to $21 billion without driving in a single railroad spike. That's the problem with pie-in-the-sky projects like this. It's not real money. It's not even monopoly money. It's fantasy money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2018, 04:32 PM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,213,138 times
Reputation: 29354
The bullet train economics are based on fantasies of 5 million passengers by 2025 and 10 million by 2050.

Critics, however, say those figures are unrealistically optimistic. A 2017 study of the project by the libertarian Reason Foundation projected 2035 bullet-train ridership at just 1.4 million. The disparity comes mainly because the foundation says far fewer Texans will switch from passenger vehicles to rail than Texas Central believes.
The foundation and others also point out that Amtrak’s nearly 17-year-old, high-speed train between Washington D.C. and Boston—a corridor that includes more than 15 percent of the entire U.S. population—carried only about 3.5 million passengers in fiscal 2016.
https://www.dmagazine.com/publicatio...-numbers-game/


Where do those numbers come from? Texas Central Partners, the firm behind the rail project, estimates that about 14 million people travel between Houston and Dallas, and they hope to capture about 36 percent of that traffic by 2025. Korson finds this overly optimistic and makes a comparison to Amtrak’s high-ish speed Acela line, which travels between Washington D.C. and Boston and accounts for about 2 percent of all passenger traffic in the high-density northeast corridor. Can the bullet train capture more ridership share than Amtrak enjoys in the Northeast? Korson doesn’t believe so, and he argues that the rail project’s finances will eventually unravel, if it ever gets built in the first place.
https://www.dmagazine.com/frontburne...off-the-rails/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2018, 11:16 PM
 
Location: Pacific 🌉 °N, 🌄°W
11,761 posts, read 7,257,984 times
Reputation: 7528
Love this comment found in the comment section at the end of the article.

Quote:
Jim Vance

Feb. 24 @ 1:59 p.m. | Registered Texas Tribune User

Jeff Kirk, do you have 40+ years of professional engineering experience working in transportation and development in Texas, MANY other parts of the US, and a dozen or more countries in Europe, Asia and Africa? I do, and you are little more than a simple-minded idiot spouting NIMBY blather -- possibly just a troll, but certainly an idiot.
How to pay for a $12 billion bullet train without asking Texas for money
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-12-2018, 11:43 PM
 
1,717 posts, read 1,692,022 times
Reputation: 2204
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Krinkle View Post
It's a 1hr 15m flight without delays. You also need to arrive at the airport appriximately 45 minutes early to deal with security, and leave the house hoping there isn't any traffic on the way to the airport. Then you have to figure in parking or shuttle service if you are driving yourself. I live in the loop and I would probably leave my house around 10am for a noon flight. That would put me in Dallas at 1:15 (if on time), and then have to mess with deboarding and another 10 minutes until I got out of the airport.

I would gladly pay a little more not to bother to bother with all that. Just get to the train station and be in Dallas in 1hr 30m.
Depending on where the terminal is in Houston, you'll be fighting traffic to get there. Then fighting to get your spot.. Or maybe they'll have advanced tickets.

Now I don't know if this bullet train will be like Metro. When fans wanted to be at the parade for the Astros, Metro couldn't carry them all. Will something like this happen with this bullet train for fans wanting to head up to see a game?

https://www.click2houston.com/news/m...-astros-parade
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 07:29 AM
bu2
 
24,093 posts, read 14,875,404 times
Reputation: 12929
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
A new report estimates the Texas bullet train could cost taxpayers $21.5 billion and concludes that privately funded high speed rail is not a feasible mode of transit outside of the Northeastern United States.
The report from the Reason Foundation estimates that the proposed Texas Central Partners project between Dallas and Houston will run at a $537 million annual operating deficit over the its first 40 years of operations.


https://www.bizjournals.com/dallas/n...yers-21-5.html


From $12 billion to $21 billion without driving in a single railroad spike. That's the problem with pie-in-the-sky projects like this. It's not real money. It's not even monopoly money. It's fantasy money.
It was a disappointing piece. The whole thing, rather than a reasoned analysis, was a hit piece on the project. They were trying to persuade people it was bad from the first charts with questionable assumptions. I am not expert enough to know whose projections are better, but its clear the Reason Foundation (as well as Texas Central) had a conclusion they wanted to reach. But Texas Central has to sell knowledgeable investors if they want to get the project rolling. We should give them the chance.

The reality is that the rail line intends to make money from real estate development, much like freight rail did in developing freight lines across the country in the 19th century. They intend to massively develop the areas in South Dallas and around Northwest Mall where they are putting stations.

There's nothing that forces the state to take it over if it fails. The investors are the ones out the $12 billion. Houston-Dallas is an ideal location for the line. Airlines in Europe have been and airlines here will be happy to let trains take over the short haul routes while they continue the profitable longer haul routes. And our airports and flight paths are continuing to get closer to capacity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 07:34 AM
 
158 posts, read 181,664 times
Reputation: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
It was a disappointing piece. The whole thing, rather than a reasoned analysis, was a hit piece on the project. They were trying to persuade people it was bad from the first charts with questionable assumptions. I am not expert enough to know whose projections are better, but its clear the Reason Foundation (as well as Texas Central) had a conclusion they wanted to reach. But Texas Central has to sell knowledgeable investors if they want to get the project rolling. We should give them the chance.

The reality is that the rail line intends to make money from real estate development, much like freight rail did in developing freight lines across the country in the 19th century. They intend to massively develop the areas in South Dallas and around Northwest Mall where they are putting stations.

There's nothing that forces the state to take it over if it fails. The investors are the ones out the $12 billion. Houston-Dallas is an ideal location for the line. Airlines in Europe have been and airlines here will be happy to let trains take over the short haul routes while they continue the profitable longer haul routes. And our airports and flight paths are continuing to get closer to capacity.
This is where I disagree. What happens if it fails? They just let it sit? The state or Feds would have to take it over, and operate at most likely a huge deficit (since it failed, you can assume its not doing what it was supposed to do). That's a pretty big risk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 07:50 AM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,213,138 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by bu2 View Post
It was a disappointing piece. The whole thing, rather than a reasoned analysis, was a hit piece on the project. They were trying to persuade people it was bad from the first charts with questionable assumptions. I am not expert enough to know whose projections are better, but its clear the Reason Foundation (as well as Texas Central) had a conclusion they wanted to reach. But Texas Central has to sell knowledgeable investors if they want to get the project rolling. We should give them the chance.

The reality is that the rail line intends to make money from real estate development, much like freight rail did in developing freight lines across the country in the 19th century. They intend to massively develop the areas in South Dallas and around Northwest Mall where they are putting stations.

There's nothing that forces the state to take it over if it fails. The investors are the ones out the $12 billion. Houston-Dallas is an ideal location for the line. Airlines in Europe have been and airlines here will be happy to let trains take over the short haul routes while they continue the profitable longer haul routes. And our airports and flight paths are continuing to get closer to capacity.
You're disappointed with that article you call a hit piece and I'm disappointed with all the cream puff articles that are propaganda pieces.

Making money from real estate development is fine by me so long as the game is played fair and TCP doesn't grab more land than needed for ROW to divvy out to special investors.

It's not just the private investors at risk. TCP plans to use federal loans. When loans are not repaid the taxpayer takes the loss. The state may be protected from legal liability (until the Senate bill gets challenged in court and tossed out), but there will be tremendous pressure to do something with 100 miles of unfinished track besides let it rust over the next 100 years.

It's a pointless discussion though because this thing will never get off the ground. I had no idea they had only conned $75 million from investors. Sounds like the investors (like the public) thinks it's a great idea... until it's time to write a check.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2018, 05:37 PM
 
1,045 posts, read 2,153,944 times
Reputation: 909
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sollaces View Post
Depending on where the terminal is in Houston, you'll be fighting traffic to get there. Then fighting to get your spot.. Or maybe they'll have advanced tickets.

Now I don't know if this bullet train will be like Metro. When fans wanted to be at the parade for the Astros, Metro couldn't carry them all. Will something like this happen with this bullet train for fans wanting to head up to see a game?

https://www.click2houston.com/news/m...-astros-parade
1. You had 500,000 people trying to get into downtown at once during the parade. This isn't a city train.
2. You will get a seat assigned when you purchase a ticket. There will most likely be 1st class, business class, and coach options.
3. Northwest Mall is a decent location. It's easy to get to for a lot of the city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2018, 05:18 PM
 
15,427 posts, read 7,482,091 times
Reputation: 19364
Quote:
Originally Posted by K LoLo View Post
This is where I disagree. What happens if it fails? They just let it sit? The state or Feds would have to take it over, and operate at most likely a huge deficit (since it failed, you can assume its not doing what it was supposed to do). That's a pretty big risk.
Why would anyone have to take it over? If it fails, it fails. Let it rot. Give the land back to the owners it came from, if eminent domain was involved. Of course, if the new operator gets all the infrastructure for pennies on the dollar, it will be far easier to make a profit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top