Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-02-2011, 04:10 PM
 
1,574 posts, read 1,020,931 times
Reputation: 124

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut View Post
The negative impacts are just a part of being here illegally in the first place.
So if the restrictions are dropped, all the negative impacts disappear too!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-02-2011, 06:30 PM
 
Location: Jacurutu
5,299 posts, read 4,854,230 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut View Post
Actually "loyal" Americans don't need to do anything of the sort. The only argument they need is that they are here illegally. The negative impacts are just a part of being here illegally in the first place.
Edwin Rubenstein misrepresents EITC year after year, all while claiming to be an "Economist". Details about EITC being out-of-reach to illegal immigrants, or a cap on the number of children that can be claimed (two, until last year, when it was raised to three) somehow gets forgotten about being mentioned by him every time. Now it looks like Dave Gibson has joined the same bandwagon.

Is there any review at all before a "news" article is posted here? It doesn't even appear to be checking for duplicate or moderator-closed topics is happening. Once something is refuted there is still a mope-fest about unrelated events put in the thread.

Case in point, the root concept here is that there is a group (it is based on ITINs, so not necessarily all illegal aliens) paying taxes with ITINs. Some of them get to lawfully claim a Child Tax Credit. A narrower subset is lawfully able to claim Additional Child Tax Credit.

When they receive a portion of those taxes back with the Additional Child Tax Credit, there is supposed to be kicking and screaming, without considering the vastly larger amounts of taxes paid by those with ITINs?...

Can we start a thread of "We dont Want THIER Taxs!!!"?...*

At least it wouldn't be a duplicate topic...

* knowing that it will degenerate into the standard fare anyway...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2011, 06:41 PM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,335,879 times
Reputation: 2136
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBMMuseum View Post
Edwin Rubenstein misrepresents EITC year after year, all while claiming to be an "Economist". Details about EITC being out-of-reach to illegal immigrants, or a cap on the number of children that can be claimed (two, until last year, when it was raised to three) somehow gets forgotten about being mentioned by him every time. Now it looks like Dave Gibson has joined the same bandwagon.

Is there any review at all before a "news" article is posted here? It doesn't even appear to be checking for duplicate or moderator-closed topics is happening. Once something is refuted there is still a mope-fest about unrelated events put in the thread.

Case in point, the root concept here is that there is a group (it is based on ITINs, so not necessarily all illegal aliens) paying taxes with ITINs. Some of them get to lawfully claim a Child Tax Credit. A narrower subset is lawfully able to claim Additional Child Tax Credit.

When they receive a portion of those taxes back with the Additional Child Tax Credit, there is supposed to be kicking and screaming, without considering the vastly larger amounts of taxes paid by those with ITINs?...

Can we start a thread of "We dont Want THIER Taxs!!!"?...*

At least it wouldn't be a duplicate topic...

* knowing that it will degenerate into the standard fare anyway...
I personally wish both the pro and anti side would just argue from the rule of law perspective because that is the bottom line anyway. I doubt that any pro-illegal would be willing to do that however because they wouldn't have a leg to stand on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2011, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Jacurutu
5,299 posts, read 4,854,230 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagonut View Post
I personally wish both the pro and anti side would just argue from the rule of law perspective because that is the bottom line anyway. I doubt that any pro-illegal would be willing to do that however because they wouldn't have a leg to stand on.
On this particular topic?:

People using ITINs to file taxes can lawfully claim Additional Child Tax Credit if they qualify...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2011, 07:18 PM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,335,879 times
Reputation: 2136
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBMMuseum View Post
On this particular topic?:

People using ITINs to file taxes can lawfully claim Additional Child Tax Credit if they qualify...
I was speaking in general on the illegal immigration issue. It tends to get away from the bottom line with these types of other topics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2011, 08:32 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,785,760 times
Reputation: 22474
How do people think remittances to Mexico can be way up? Doesn't anyone wonder how illegals can come over here and take the very lowest paying jobs, have much larger numbers of children than Americans have, and still have hundreds of dollars to send out of the country, billions of dollars every month?

Americans are hurting, no job creation in August but Obama and his administration are doing all they can to entice illegals to move on over.

No one moves to an area with over 9% unemployment rates from an area with 5% or so unemployment if they are really wanting jobs. It's the government handouts more than anything that attract.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-02-2011, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Jacurutu
5,299 posts, read 4,854,230 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
How do people think remittances to Mexico can be way up? Doesn't anyone wonder how illegals can come over here and take the very lowest paying jobs, have much larger numbers of children than Americans have, and still have hundreds of dollars to send out of the country, billions of dollars every month?...
Again, with ¨billions¨ per ¨month¨ as remittance amounts...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2011, 05:30 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,359,541 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhymetime View Post
So if the restrictions are dropped, all the negative impacts disappear too!
Wrong. If we restricted illiterate people who are a detriment to the country from coming in we would be far better off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2011, 07:52 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,785,760 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhymetime View Post
So if the restrictions are dropped, all the negative impacts disappear too!
That's like saying if you would only open your gates and the doors to your home to all the homeless bums and let them move into your home to eat your food and crowd into the rooms of your home that all the negative impacts disappear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-03-2011, 08:04 AM
 
1,569 posts, read 1,212,790 times
Reputation: 111
But you guys, ya see, those arguments apply equally to all poor people. We'd DEFINITELY be better off if there were just straight up less of them.

So right now you're pretending that your concern is their level of education etc. etc. etc. But the argument will, without fail, carry on like so:

Us: "If they are legalized they will no longer be illegal."
You: "But they are poor and uneducated."
Us: "So are the poor people here, do you have a problem with them?"
You: "They have a right to be here."
Us: "But if we legalized illegals, they'd have a right to be here, too."
You: "I SAID THEY ARE ****ING POOR!!!!1"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top