Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 04-26-2012, 10:55 AM
 
14,306 posts, read 13,320,782 times
Reputation: 2136

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by IBMMuseum View Post
It isn't my sobriety in question for this tangent...
You actually think that he was referring to you personally?

 
Old 04-26-2012, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
2,553 posts, read 2,436,354 times
Reputation: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBMMuseum View Post
Then why a House Bill required to amend SB1070 specifically excluding profiling?...
To stop critics from claiming that the law would allow authorities to use racial profiling to enforce. By writing an amendment that specifically bans it, it shows that profiling is not the intention of the law. It should have erased any criticism regarding profiling but, it hasn't because critics ignore 2162 so they can continue with their agenda.
 
Old 04-26-2012, 04:34 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
2,553 posts, read 2,436,354 times
Reputation: 495
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBMMuseum View Post
Why was SB1070 phrased as mimicking federal law then? Did that federal law need to be amended by an equivalent of HB2162? You aren't understanding my point in that "A Few Good Men" moment:

If orders are always followed, why is there a need to verify that they will be carried out correctly?...

HB2162 specifically amended SB1070, not any other legislation. If it isn't implemented any differently from other laws, why does it need that reassurance that it would function correctly? I don't think others are quite catching my focus here.
Because when federal immigration laws were written there wasn't a group of people with an agenda to resist them.....it would have been considered unamerican.

The bottom line is, the law was quickly amended to clarify it's intentions by specifically banning it so, why are we still taking about it like it doesn't....what's your point....that long before the date the law went into effective, it didn't specifically ban profiling for a few days?

Last edited by Danno3314; 04-26-2012 at 04:46 PM..
 
Old 04-26-2012, 07:46 PM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,556,977 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
It is only a race when the pro illegals wish to pull the race card in an attempt to deflect.
Silly me! I must have forgotten.
 
Old 04-26-2012, 07:49 PM
 
Location: The land where cats rule
10,908 posts, read 9,556,977 times
Reputation: 3602
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBMMuseum View Post
It isn't my sobriety in question for this tangent...
No, it is the act itself. If you can't see that, I pity you.
 
Old 04-26-2012, 07:53 PM
 
749 posts, read 838,829 times
Reputation: 647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jareb View Post
Always thought they did! If the Feds had enforced the laws as they are written then none of this would be necessary. And this is the fault of the administration under BOTH parties.
^^^this
 
Old 04-26-2012, 08:12 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
2,171 posts, read 1,459,438 times
Reputation: 1322
Quote:
Originally Posted by All American NYC View Post
Arizona had it right.
Damn right.
 
Old 04-26-2012, 09:19 PM
 
Location: Jacurutu
5,299 posts, read 4,848,445 times
Reputation: 603
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arjay51 View Post
No, it is the act itself. If you can't see that, I pity you.
Whooosh!...

LOL...
 
Old 04-27-2012, 12:54 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,707,823 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBMMuseum View Post
Then why a House Bill required to amend SB1070 specifically excluding profiling?...
Profile? Most hispanics claim to be white so how can there be profiling? Profiling of white people? And certainly when it comes to criminals, hispanics are classified as white or caucasian.

In case you don't realize - "hispanic" is not a race.
 
Old 04-27-2012, 12:58 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,202,108 times
Reputation: 9623
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
In case you don't realize - "hispanic" is not a race.
Good point. If it is accepted that Mexicans are a combination of Spanish and American Indian blood, then they would be mixed Caucasian/Mongolian races.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top