Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Searching someone based on their ethnic features is not probably cause. Supporters of the bill will respond by saying that this law only applies to citizens. Correct, so if they search just one American citizen, they have violated the Constitution. Aren't the supporters of this law the same people who cry about their freedoms being taken away?
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Searching someone based on their ethnic features is not probably cause. Supporters of the bill will respond by saying that this law only applies to citizens. Correct, so if they search just one American citizen, they have violated the Constitution. Aren't the supporters of this law the same people who cry about their freedoms being taken away?
In the Tea Baggers """Real America""" Constitutional Rights are for """Real Americans""", not minorities.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Searching someone based on their ethnic features is not probably cause. Supporters of the bill will respond by saying that this law only applies to citizens. Correct, so if they search just one American citizen, they have violated the Constitution. Aren't the supporters of this law the same people who cry about their freedoms being taken away?
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Searching someone based on their ethnic features is not probably cause. Supporters of the bill will respond by saying that this law only applies to citizens. Correct, so if they search just one American citizen, they have violated the Constitution. Aren't the supporters of this law the same people who cry about their freedoms being taken away?
I wonder why they had to push this new law? Any experts?
Show me the section of law that defines probable cause as ethnic features.
What criteria will law enforcement use to search individuals? Do tell? The only way this law will achieve it's goal is to violate the constitution. Otherwise it's an effective and worthless law.
Russell Pearce (author of the bill) is very suspect.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
