Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Austin Texas vowed to boycott and end all business ties with the government of Arizona.
Later reported that the City of Austin has NO business ties with the government of Arizona and the City Council was informed of that before their vote.
Austin Texas vowed to boycott and end all business ties with the government of Arizona.
Later reported that the City of Austin has NO business ties with the government of Arizona and the City Council was informed of that before their vote.
If the law is constitutional why is there a boycott? I understand a slight adjustment was made but not enough to satisfy those opposed. In America, we don't normally make minority ethnics "second-class" citizens. Cardinal Mahony called it "Nazi-like and Communistic." Churches in Arizona have also voiced opposition to the law. This is a moral issue of equal treatment for all Americans. Haven't you stopped to think that they may have a point?
Are you serious? No one has been able to explain what part is unconstitutional, not even Attorney General Eric Holder. He is against the law, but admitted never reading the ten page law. I would love someone to tell me which part is unconstitutional and I will have no problem opposing this law.
Mahoney should spend more time weeding out the child rapists in the church instead of protecting them. he needs to mind his own business.
No, more like pimping for votes. They gotta keep their names in the press some way. Even though most American are for the law, any press is good press. Well, at least to a politician.
</H1> Well ain't that a kick in the head! Attorney General "Stedman Graham" hasn't even read the dadblasted LAW!!!!!!!!!! But yet he's all over the good folks in Arizona for protecting themselves!!
Obama no doubt hasn't read it either!! Yet he's out talking about being harassed at Baskin and Robbins!!
What a piece of work we have in charge.....all of them!!!
THIS THING HAS FEWER PAGES THAN THE HEALTHCARE BILL AND THEY STILL WON'T READ IT!!!!! TEN PAGES!!!!!!!!!!!
Are you serious? No one has been able to explain what part is unconstitutional, not even Attorney General Eric Holder. He is against the law, but admitted never reading the ten page law. I would love someone to tell me which part is unconstitutional and I will have no problem opposing this law.
Mahoney should spend more time weeding out the child rapists in the church instead of protecting them. he needs to mind his own business.
you might be right!
The issue is racial profiling highly offensive to Latinos. Getting technical is pointless unless your read public sentiment. The marches & boycotts are against Arizona [not in support of Arizona]. Arizona will make decisions based on out-of-state pressure because ultimately money counts!
The issue is racial profiling highly offensive to Latinos. Getting technical is pointless unless your read public sentiment. The marches & boycotts are against Arizona [not in support of Arizona]. Arizona will make decisions based on out-of-state pressure because ultimately money counts!
But there is NO racial profiling allowed in this law! God, I am getting a headache.
California has completely sold out to Illegal Aliens that have clearly violated are laws. I guess social justice trumps rule of law now days. What's next?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.