Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Internet
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-25-2010, 02:46 PM
 
Location: Planet Eaarth
8,954 posts, read 20,695,144 times
Reputation: 7193

Advertisements

In Popular Science this month they previewed a new WIFI service that will benefit all including much of rural America!

Below is a link to the startup company that will offer the service so it will help all interested to monitor the links to see if, and when, the service is available in your area.

ShowMyWhiteSpace.com | Products & Services (http://www.spectrumbridge.com/web/Products-Services/find-available-white-space-show-my-white-space-site.html - broken link)

-and-

Show My White Space
(to check you exact location)

Disclaimer: I have no affiliation whatsoever with this company. I offer this info to alert those who may need broadband and have difficulty getting the service.
A simple heads up if you will........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-25-2010, 03:03 PM
Bo Bo won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Tenth Edition (Apr-May 2014). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Ohio
17,107 posts, read 38,136,542 times
Reputation: 14447
FWIW, the lobbying group that represents the nation's broadcasters is fighting the introduction of this technology. You may have seen some of their advertising about contacting Congress over this "threat to free television" on your local stations.

NAB throws down, sues FCC over white space internet -- Engadget

Another way to view it is that this is one example of the technology advances that we were promised in exchange for converting our televisions to digital.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2010, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Planet Eaarth
8,954 posts, read 20,695,144 times
Reputation: 7193
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowie View Post
FWIW, the lobbying group that represents the nation's broadcasters is fighting the introduction of this technology. You may have seen some of their advertising about contacting Congress over this "threat to free television" on your local stations.

NAB throws down, sues FCC over white space internet -- Engadget

Another way to view it is that this is one example of the technology advances that we were promised in exchange for converting our televisions to digital.
FROM YOUR LINK.....
"it seems like NAB is taking advantage of confusion at the FCC following the delayed DTV transition to try and pull the rug out while no one's looking. A bastard move, to be sure, but we doubt it's going to be successful -- going up against both the government and the heavy hitters of the tech industry is rarely a winning idea."

Just more greed and lies it seems. However, I still hold out hope that some good use and fairness comes of the transition.

As long as people are aware of this it might be a little harder to pull off the theft of this segment of the air ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2010, 03:56 PM
Bo Bo won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Tenth Edition (Apr-May 2014). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Ohio
17,107 posts, read 38,136,542 times
Reputation: 14447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tightwad View Post
FROM YOUR LINK.....
"it seems like NAB is taking advantage of confusion at the FCC following the delayed DTV transition to try and pull the rug out while no one's looking. A bastard move, to be sure, but we doubt it's going to be successful -- going up against both the government and the heavy hitters of the tech industry is rarely a winning idea."

Just more greed and lies it seems. However, I still hold out hope that some good use and fairness comes of the transition.

As long as people are aware of this it might be a little harder to pull off the theft of this segment of the air ways.
Yep, that's why it's good that people are getting to read about the benefit of this particular "threat to free television."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2010, 11:05 AM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,494 posts, read 61,466,561 times
Reputation: 30459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bowie View Post
FWIW, the lobbying group that represents the nation's broadcasters is fighting the introduction of this technology. You may have seen some of their advertising about contacting Congress over this "threat to free television" on your local stations. ...
???

When they shut down the high-power TV broadcasts, and went to low-power digital, it left most of the nation without TV coverage [most of the nation speaking in terms of square miles and not urban population centers]

So your saying that Tv broadcasters [who only transmit in urban areas] are now fighting the technology to bring media to rural America?

Wow. That sucks.



No I have not seen anything about this on our 'local stations'. We have none, if you recall they reduced TV broadcast coverage a year ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2010, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Planet Eaarth
8,954 posts, read 20,695,144 times
Reputation: 7193
Quote:
Originally Posted by forest beekeeper View Post
???

When they shut down the high-power TV broadcasts, and went to low-power digital, it left most of the nation without TV coverage [most of the nation speaking in terms of square miles and not urban population centers]

So your saying that Tv broadcasters [who only transmit in urban areas] are now fighting the technology to bring media to rural America?

Wow. That sucks.



No I have not seen anything about this on our 'local stations'. We have none, if you recall they reduced TV broadcast coverage a year ago.
"IF" I read your post right you are unaware of the analog to digital switch over that happened last year. There is no more analog (expempting a few local low power TV stations) TV anymore. That whole analog TV frequency band was abandoned and re-sold to mostly cell phone companies.

This story is about the use of the white (blank) spaces between frequencies to carry WIFI signals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2010, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,494 posts, read 61,466,561 times
Reputation: 30459
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tightwad View Post
"IF" I read your post right you are unaware of the analog to digital switch over that happened last year. There is no more analog (exempting a few local low power TV stations) TV anymore. That whole analog TV frequency band was abandoned and re-sold to mostly cell phone companies.

This story is about the use of the white (blank) spaces between frequencies to carry WIFI signals.
? You missed me there. ?

When 'High-power Analog TV broadcast' was shut down last year most of the nation [which is rural] lost TV reception. Today in the urban areas of the nation TV is broadcast in a 'low-power digital' format.

Now there is a move to bring wifi coverage to the nation.

But the TV broadcasters want to block this from happening, because it would bring some form of coverage to rural America.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2010, 01:50 PM
Bo Bo won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Tenth Edition (Apr-May 2014). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Ohio
17,107 posts, read 38,136,542 times
Reputation: 14447
Quote:
Originally Posted by forest beekeeper View Post
But the TV broadcasters want to block this from happening, because it would bring some form of coverage to rural America.
The reason broadcasters want the FCC to not approve the new service is that they believe it will interfere with their broadcast signals, since it would be using frequencies that are next to the broadcast channels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2010, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,494 posts, read 61,466,561 times
Reputation: 30459
It would be nice to get something out to rural America.

We once had a couple TV channels, now we have ....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-26-2010, 02:49 PM
 
Location: NH Lakes Region
407 posts, read 1,559,522 times
Reputation: 539
Bowie, you seriously believe that? The information stated that the white space could be used providing it did not interfere with existing communications. I'm thinking that the current broadcasters think they can make another buck themselves, if they can block this more open usage of the frequencies.

No matter what, the consumer will lose -end up subsidizing in some respect whatever is available and/or end up with fewer capabilities and options.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Science and Technology > Internet

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top