Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-11-2018, 03:59 AM
 
106,720 posts, read 108,913,061 times
Reputation: 80208

Advertisements

looking at some returns .

fidelity high yield up for the 1 year 4.09%

fidelity total bond 1 year minus 1.31

fidelity floating rate 1 year up 4.32%

fidelity corporate bond 1 year minus 1.25%

fidelity new market income (emerging market bonds 1 year minus 7.42%

fidelity capital and income 1 year up 4.35%

TLT LONG TERM TREASURIES 1 YEAR minus 4.89


so you can see bond fund type really matters and they each fit the big picture better at times than other times .

this year the bond side of wellesley is crushing it year to date . it is barely positive for a fund with 40% equities . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-11-2018, 05:02 AM
 
30,896 posts, read 36,975,933 times
Reputation: 34531
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
looking at some returns .

fidelity high yield up for the 1 year 4.09%

fidelity total bond 1 year minus 1.31

fidelity floating rate 1 year up 4.32%

fidelity corporate bond 1 year minus 1.25%

fidelity new market income (emerging market bonds 1 year minus 7.42%

fidelity capital and income 1 year up 4.35%

TLT LONG TERM TREASURIES 1 YEAR minus 4.89


so you can see bond fund type really matters and they each fit the big picture better at times than other times .

this year the bond side of wellesley is crushing it year to date . it is barely positive for a fund with 40% equities . .
So what? It's normal for investment grade bonds to have a bad year from time to time. That's just the nature of a balanced portfolio.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2018, 05:56 AM
 
Location: Mount Airy, Maryland
16,282 posts, read 10,424,652 times
Reputation: 27604
I had admitted limited knowledge of bonds in another thread but not as limited as some of the posters here. Is someone really comparing the risk of bonds with the risk of the stock market? Dear Lord.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-11-2018, 06:28 AM
 
106,720 posts, read 108,913,061 times
Reputation: 80208
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysticaltyger View Post
So what? It's normal for investment grade bonds to have a bad year from time to time. That's just the nature of a balanced portfolio.
we have never had anything but a bull market in bonds over the last 45 years . we hit a speed bump every now and then but nothing that carried over or can be called a bear market for bonds .

it can be very different now and has been . very different fed policy than prior . BND- vanguard total bond returned 1.62% the last 3 years as an example . .ffrhx floating rate almost 5% ...

so i truly believe having flexibility in your choices in bond funds is very important today . a strong economy with rising rates calls for one style , an economy falling in to recession is quite another . some models fly fighter cover all the time with powerful long term treasuries .

while you can sit in a balanced fund for convience , you will likely do much better by being able to change equity and bonds funds as the big picture changes .

the more conservative you are the more crucial bond fund selection can become .

the insight income model which is only 24% equities has had a rough year and has been negative for most of the year , so has wellesly income . on the other hand the 60/40 growth and income model has been up all year and the growth model is seeing double digit gains . so there are times being more conservative in certain assets can be the riskier bet because they never develop that cushion for anything to go wrong .

so in conservative models bond fund selection is going to be very very important unlike the past it seems . wellesly income is down to about 36% equities and 22% of the bonds are in long term bonds 20-30 years . so they are very defensive . that is great if that is your view but not a good fit if that is not your sentiment or goal .


Last edited by mathjak107; 09-11-2018 at 06:57 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Investing

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top