[logline]

It seems to me that the Wynn has a slightly more affluent client base which makes your job as a security guard slightly less risky and more pleasant. Most of the drunk kids and mayhem would opt for more low-scale properties. Just a thought.

[Onlyliveonce]

Originally Posted by logline

It seems to me that the Wynn has a slightly more affluent client base which makes your job as a security guard slightly less risky and more pleasant. Most of the drunk kids and mayhem would opt for more low-scale properties. Just a thought.

The Bellagio, which I would consider a high end property has had there share of violence and high profile incidents.

[BBMW]

And the problem with just taking the Wynn job is, what? I seem to be missing something.

[von949]

Originally Posted by BBMW

And the problem with just taking the Wynn job is, what? I seem to be missing something.

Not knowing what's on the other side of the fence. Could be a deranged starving Pit Bull or treasure chest full of diamonds, rubes, gold and coins.


Motorola DynaTAC 8000x

[jdrtx]

Mr. Pump says:

.............But I'm not that moral of a person................


And he also says:



...........I was offered a job as a security officer for The Wynn.......



An amoral "security officer", folks, is one part of what has happened to this country. School teachers, local and federal government, "FIRE" community, doctors, sports stars, celebrities, also fall into this mess. Where is the outrage?

This used to be a hella country.

[cre8lite]

take the wynn job - it's already secured. there's nothing saying you have to stay with them until your dying days.

[aardogfsu]

Originally Posted by jdrtx

Mr. Pump says:

.............But I'm not that moral of a person................


This used to be a hella country.

Give me a break, the guy's looking out for his best interest, good for him.

Both places he was offered employment lie about their earnings (as do all casinos)...what's moral about his own employer?

Take the Wynn job.

[Jukesgrrl]

Originally Posted by Caltovegas

Have you considered each benefit package?

Corporate benefit packages today are like Kleenex. They get thrown out and replaced on a regular basis. Obviously, if one is notably superior to another (for instance one includes health insurance, the other doesn't) that factor should be considered in terms of total compensation. But I would be shocked to find out that one entertainment corporation in LV is offering benefits to entry-level security personnel that are particularly superior to that of another entertainment corp. Why would they? These companies are in business to make money. They will offer benefit packages to workers that are as stingy as they can make them and get away with it.

Corporate benefits are most notable at the level of employees who have individual contracts (high-level executives or special personnel like celebrity spokespersons). As for the worker-bees, corporations only jazz up their comp packages when they are in a competitive hiring mode. That's hasn't been the case in most professions in recent years. I was employed by one Fortune 100 company for 18 years. Year-to-year my benefits either stayed the same or got worse. Never was I gifted with anything I didn't have on Day One. They just chipped away at it, bit by bit, to add to the bottom line, which is how the top executives earn their big bonuses.

[damania]

I would think Wynn would be a better place to work at than MGM. The caliber of people you'd work and learn from at Wynn will be higher than at MGM. Do you really want to work security at Circus Circus, Excalibur, or Luxor?

[airics]

Originally Posted by damania

I would think Wynn would be a better place to work at than MGM. The caliber of people you'd work and learn from at Wynn will be higher than at MGM. Do you really want to work security at Circus Circus, Excalibur, or Luxor?

Bellagio is an MGM property. Since the job has been offered at the Wynn, take it... but if you had to offers.. i'd go to MGM, many many more opportunities