Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-10-2014, 10:05 AM
 
349 posts, read 990,850 times
Reputation: 332

Advertisements

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/10/us...ecline.html?hp

Quote:
- Los Angeles is enduring a series of blows that have challenged its self-esteem and even its long-term stability. Some appear more symbolic, like the departure of “The Tonight Show” for New York, followed by the plaintive appeal by Mayor Eric M. Garcetti that CBS move “The Late Show” to Los Angeles when David Letterman retires next year. Others are beyond its control, such as the disconcerting wave of earthquakes that have rumbled the region in recent weeks, reminding residents of how unprepared Southern California is for a cataclysmic temblor.

Last edited by Count David; 04-14-2014 at 03:50 AM.. Reason: only a snippet please
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-10-2014, 10:11 AM
 
Location: Dana Point
1,224 posts, read 1,824,471 times
Reputation: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene80 View Post
widespread poverty and job stagnation, huge municipal pension obligations
Thank you liberals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 10:12 AM
 
3,550 posts, read 6,489,882 times
Reputation: 3506
waiting for that first "New York biased article" response. Ooops, I think I just did it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 10:28 AM
 
5,381 posts, read 8,687,308 times
Reputation: 4550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene80 View Post
Somehow, you failed to offer a balanced perspective since you did not note this:

"Russell Goldsmith, president of City National Bank in Los Angeles, who served on a similar blue-ribbon commission six years ago, called the new description an unfortunate characterization” of what Los Angeles is like today.

'It is certainly not in decline,' he said. 'Los Angeles, like many cities, has some serious issues and problems, but it also has remarkable resources and opportunities.”

Nor, did you highlight the following:

“Because it points an inappropriately unduly negative picture of Los Angeles, it can’t help the image of the city,” Mr. Goldsmith said. “I’m surprised by it, but I don’t know why they took such a strikingly negative view. Maybe they felt they had to do this to get attention.”

What about this?

"Paul Krekorian, a Democratic member of the City Council, dismissed the exercise as 'an opportunity for a collection of people to share all of the things that aggravate them most, rather than a thoughtful consideration of the status quo of the city right now.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/10/us...ecline.html?hp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 12:26 PM
 
Location: LBC
4,156 posts, read 5,562,808 times
Reputation: 3594
Consider the source:

"The L.A. 2020 commission is back. Three months after issuing "A Time for Truth," its term-paper jeremiad about the decline of the city's economy and finances, the commission has now issued the follow-up report, "A Time for Action."

Finally, after a year, the commission's agenda is becoming clear: to empower the powerful.

The commission is drawn from the leadership of the city's business and labor communities, and its reports reflect the insularity and self-interest of its membership.


Let's start with the DWP. As you may recall, last year's mayoral election largely turned on the issue of DWP union money. Brian D'Arcy, the head of the DWP union, spent $4 million trying to elect Wendy Greuel. That backfired. The voters elected Eric Garcetti, sending a clear message that D'Arcy should not be allowed to control City Hall.

And yet, for some unfathomable reason, D'Arcy was put on the L.A. 2020 commission. Worse, it looks like he was allowed to write the section on the DWP. In fact, the commission's report might better be titled: "A Time for Action: Brian D'Arcy's Plan to Restore Faith and Confidence in the DWP."

How the L.A. 2020 Commission Screwed Up | The Informer | Los Angeles | Los Angeles News and Events | LA Weekly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 12:27 PM
 
Location: Southern California
12,713 posts, read 15,532,629 times
Reputation: 35512
My report finds this report to be crap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 12:35 PM
 
43,659 posts, read 44,385,284 times
Reputation: 20559
This report paints a very negative picture of Los Angeles. Since it appears in The NY Times perhaps it is trying to deter NYers from considering a move to L.A.!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Virginia
18,717 posts, read 31,083,378 times
Reputation: 42988
Quote:
"The Los Angeles 2020 Commission presented a catalog of failings that it said were a unique burden to the city: widespread poverty and job stagnation, huge municipal pension obligations, a struggling port and tourism industry and paralyzing traffic that would not be eased even with a continuing multibillion-dollar mass transit initiative."
Oh, please. NONE of those problems are unique to Los Angeles. In fact, these days they are common in almost every large city. And plenty of the smaller ones too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 01:48 PM
 
Location: NYC
3,076 posts, read 5,498,983 times
Reputation: 3008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chava61 View Post
This report paints a very negative picture of Los Angeles. Since it appears in The NY Times perhaps it is trying to deter NYers from considering a move to L.A.!
Won't deter me!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Southern California
12,713 posts, read 15,532,629 times
Reputation: 35512
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Geek View Post
My report finds this report to be crap.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chava61 View Post
This report paints a very negative picture of Los Angeles. Since it appears in The NY Times perhaps it is trying to deter NYers from considering a move to L.A.!
Quote:
Originally Posted by jen5276 View Post
Won't deter me!
On second thought...

The article is spot on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California > Los Angeles
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top