Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Maine
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-26-2008, 10:08 AM
 
Location: God's Country, Maine
2,054 posts, read 4,579,827 times
Reputation: 1305
Just curious what everyone thinks of the casino on the ballot.

The way life might be | Portland Press Herald
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-26-2008, 10:11 AM
 
8,767 posts, read 18,671,905 times
Reputation: 3525
Personally I don't think a casino is necessary, I'll vote against it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Mid Missouri
21,353 posts, read 8,451,759 times
Reputation: 33341
They're tryin to get one in down here too with our one hit wonder governor Patrick on board. Yeesh! I haven't seen where the places that have allowed them are any better off than the ones who don't. Seems to me it's just a gravy train for the politicians... more money to spend rather than dropping costs for the taxpayers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Maryland's 6th District.
8,357 posts, read 25,242,922 times
Reputation: 6541
I say go for it. I have lived in two locations in the past that have had casinos go up near-by and for the most part things turned out okay.

I am willing to bet top dollar that the opposition to these casinos is backed largely by Hollywood Slots. Another casino in this state will take business away from them, and really making them the only ones who will suffer.

It does not matter if a new casino is owned by a Las Vegas entity as all businesses are owned by someone else anyways (like Poland Springs is NOT a Maine company, they are owned by Nestle, which if you did not know is a Switzerland based company. But no body cares about that, though, huh?). Regardless, a new casino will create jobs and mucho tax revenue for the state. But from the likes of it some Mainers want to keep Maine poor. Gives them something to moan about, I guess.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 12:34 PM
 
Location: Southern Maine, Greater Portland
513 posts, read 897,153 times
Reputation: 528
I am undecided on this one. My biggest concern is the impact it will have on our state. Maine is such a great place to live and visit because of its low crime and Values. What will we be giving up in exchange for state revenue, and is it worth it. I will keep checking in on this thread to see what others know or feel about this, I am very interested.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Maine
6,631 posts, read 13,544,749 times
Reputation: 7381
Quote:
Originally Posted by mainesnowflake View Post
I am undecided on this one. My biggest concern is the impact it will have on our state. Maine is such a great place to live and visit because of its low crime and Values. What will we be giving up in exchange for state revenue, and is it worth it. I will keep checking in on this thread to see what others know or feel about this, I am very interested.
How has Hollywood Slots negatively impacted the city of Bangor?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 01:23 PM
 
8,767 posts, read 18,671,905 times
Reputation: 3525
if you want to do something positive and long lasting for Maine's economy why not come up with a plan to utilize the area and runway of Brunswick's Naval Air station when it closes.
It seems to me there's loads of potential in that area. Perhaps a regional base for Fed-Ex, DHL ,or UPS along with a meeting , convention center, fleet jet repair facility, new hotels etc. With the train from Boston running into Brunswick, it could be a central hub for the whole state. There would be many hundreds of sustainable jobs created and not just dealing blackjack and slinging drinks. Casinos seem to be sleazy operations slapped together for a quick buck. They take no brains to put together and give very little back to the communities who have to put up with them. Maine doesn't need to be turned into another sleaze hole. I'd like to think people come here for the beauty of the State not to gamble away the rent money. Casinos and deserts go well together. There's nothing there in the first place so who cares?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Mid Missouri
21,353 posts, read 8,451,759 times
Reputation: 33341
I'd rep ya for that post Maineah, but I've given too many out today over in the political threads section. lol GREAT post!!!!! I second your thoughts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Florida (SW)
48,138 posts, read 22,007,656 times
Reputation: 47136
I lived in San Diego County Ca where there were many casinos....and although I have no moral exception to gambling....I don't think that they bring very much that is positive to a community, and they drain off much more revenue than they bring....even considering jobs. Obviously of the millions of dollars that are wagered at the casinos......most of it is lost and most of the profits go to out of state interests. The State of Maine would be the poorer for the deal. The more desperate the economy the more people will wager good money after bad.

I say this with some ambivelance because we did go on occassion and had a good time...but we always knew the end result would be that we would lose what ever amount we set as our limit. It was like the price of admission for any other entertainment.....somethng you spent...not an investment. I would see people losing large amounts that they didnt appear to be able to afford....old people made up a large per cent of the clients....gambling pensions and social security money.

I plan to vote No. I dont like the way the prop is loaded in favor of the out of state interests. I am hopeful that Scarborough will also vote No on their local gambling inititive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2008, 02:50 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,083 posts, read 38,859,793 times
Reputation: 17006
I agree with the first part of Maineah's post, but not really the second part. What a casino can give back is ENTIRELY in the hands of the state when they write the agreement with the operators of the casino. The trick is too not get too greedy, but not be too giving either. I would have agreed 100% until I have seen first hand how much good a casino can do to a local area if the agreement is written right. The area I grew up in was always a bit economically depressed and remained so until I left for Maine in 87. Now that we are back to that area, the only real difference is the addition of a casino nearby. Guess what, all the local school districts that are impacted by the casino have new energy efficient buildings and/or upgrades to existing ones in their systems. There hasn't been any rise in crime except a few more speeding/OUI tickets given out and that could very well be the crack down on driving under the influence and speeding. I have seen the same increase while living in Aroostook County over the same period of time, so I lean toward better enforcement of those infractions and not just a rise in "popularity" of those infractions. The last year B&E's have gone up, but that is more an indication of the slumping economy and not a casino that has been in place for almost 10 years now. There is more entertainment in the form of concerts, and community plays that take place in the casinos small showroom and a lot of civic functions are held in the ball rooms and convention areas. The number of jobs really isn't that huge, but they are more than minimum wage for the most part. It is an "Indian" casino and from the changes I see in the local tribes I think they are a great idea. There is much more tribe/community pride (and rightly so, it has been cleaned up tremendously) and the abject poverty that was fairly common is almost gone now.

The school system my kids go to has benefited as well even being 30 miles away. We have a brand new upper elementary school which has been needed for a LONG time. The other buildings have gone through total renovations to the areas that needed it and although a lot of the money came from a bond passed by the voters of the community, the matching state funds are from the casino close by. Without those it would have been back to band-aid fixes crossed fingers. Kids would still be sitting on the floors of the schools to eat lunch, because there just wasn't enough room in the cafeteria to fit them all in. Band, gym, & Choir would all still be sharing the same gym, at the same time due to space issues. I WAS a firm believer in the "evils" of local casinos, but after living close to one, I have changed my mind.

It all depends on how the state writes the agreements though, and I CAN still see how it could be bad news if the casinos are given what amounts to free rein. I agree that a casino, or even multiple casinos are NOT the answer to economic turn around of an entire state. That is going to take the development of places like Brunswick Air Station, and further development of the old Loring Air Force base in Limestone (even though they are fighting the whole distance and location issue up there). It is going to take more in depth changes to the way business is conducted in Augusta. A casino can be a BIG economic shot in the arm to whatever area it is located in though. Any place that can employ 900+ people in an area the size Southern Aroostook County or Northern Washington County cannot be dismissed out of hand because it is different from what is the "norm." This is the place I am talking about that is close to me. It is typical of the smaller casinos that most tribes have from what I have seen around. It might give a bit of perspective of what you might be looking at there. Little River Casino Resort, Manistee, MI. (http://www.littlerivercasino.com/index.html - broken link) Not only do they provide a lot of jobs for their own tribe members, but a lot of jobs for the surrounding communities as well. Plus construction jobs all the time as well as landscaping, snow removal, and other secondary jobs that are directly tied into the casino, but doesn't fall under their own payroll. It has been VERY good for this area.

If it is local interests that are building it can be good, it it is out of state, then elston is correct that most of the income is funneled reight out of town without much benefit. That also is covered by the agreement between the state and the owners of the places though. It all revolves around the agreement!!!!!!

Last edited by Bydand; 10-26-2008 at 03:02 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Maine

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top