Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-23-2016, 06:44 AM
 
3,268 posts, read 3,323,101 times
Reputation: 2682

Advertisements

'And good, fertility declines, fewer people have children and fewer children are born. This is a bonus for society.'

I agree with this as well. I know a handful of people with 4 kids, one even has 5. They all got married in their 20s. Ive been suprised by a few of my friends who went for a 3rd child in their late 30s though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2016, 07:58 AM
 
Location: Westwood, MA
5,037 posts, read 6,926,821 times
Reputation: 5961
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
They're smart. People shouldn't get married that young. Finish school, get established in a career path, live a bit, date around and find the right person. The divorce rates for people 30+ with college education plummets. It's not surprise and getting married when still a child in one's 20s is generally ill advised.
I think part of the problem is that people consider someone in their 20s to still be a child. Certainly the people who think that way shouldn't be getting married or having kids, but if you've graduated college (or college equivalent) and have a steady job there are a lot of biological advantages to having kids in your 20s.

Another big advantage is that you'll be young enough to really enjoy life post-kids. My parents had two kids by 22 and were able to work internationally guilt-free in their 40s and 50s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 08:21 AM
 
3,268 posts, read 3,323,101 times
Reputation: 2682
Yes there are pluses and minuses to both situations...people are living longer but women still just have a small window really in when they can have children. Seems like 20's is too young for many people these days especially living in the boston area where you want to finish school and get your finances together first. Then by waiting it does seem strange to be 46 or 47 with a 10 year old. My mom was 34 when i was 10. My DH will be 52 when our youngest is 10.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 08:33 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,962,945 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayrandom View Post
I think part of the problem is that people consider someone in their 20s to still be a child. Certainly the people who think that way shouldn't be getting married or having kids, but if you've graduated college (or college equivalent) and have a steady job there are a lot of biological advantages to having kids in your 20s.

Another big advantage is that you'll be young enough to really enjoy life post-kids. My parents had two kids by 22 and were able to work internationally guilt-free in their 40s and 50s.
Well mentally people aren't adults until their mid 20s. The brains aren't fully formed until 25. And indeed, while reproductively an adult (usually around 13!), the bodies aren't fully formed either until mid 20s.

And while there may be biological advantages, their are financial, lifestyle, and experience disadvantages. You have college, then work for a bit, than grad school (some people go right to grad school, but that's just flipping the order) and then often moving around for job opportunities. It's pretty uncommon to be in a place to even properly look for a life mate until early 30s. Then you have to get lucky and find one.

If you're getting married in your 20s the likelihood of divorce goes way up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 09:03 AM
 
9,882 posts, read 7,212,572 times
Reputation: 11472
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
The marriage rate among Millennials is dropping like a stone. Only 26% marry before age 29. The economic reality for the working class is that you need to get married to someone with at least your income level and stay married.

The last time I looked a few months ago, it looked like it would take about $90K of household income to buy a starter home that needs some TLC in a GreatSchools 7 town. $70K lands you in a GreatSchools 5 town and continues the socioeconomic self-segregation.
Last time I checked, marriage wasn't a requirement for people to live together, buy homes together, have a family together.

I take the greatschools rating with a grain of salt. IIRC, it uses only MCAS test scores to rate schools. And you always note that students do well when parents are involved so IMHO, greatschools can be over rated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 10:28 AM
 
1,298 posts, read 1,332,972 times
Reputation: 1229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatsnext75 View Post
Then by waiting it does seem strange to be 46 or 47 with a 10 year old.
To most people around here that is the norm, nothing strange about it if you ask me. My late 20s and early 30s were an awesome time for my wife and I - kid free we lived in several countries and traveled like crazy. Feels like it was a dream now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 10:37 AM
 
Location: North of Boston
560 posts, read 751,772 times
Reputation: 656
agreed. was well into my 30s before we had our 1st. it allowed us to travel, do things spur of the moment, and enjoy each other before we became parents 1st and then a couple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 10:41 AM
 
3,268 posts, read 3,323,101 times
Reputation: 2682
i think some people push the limits with when they can/should have children quite honestly. I think women should stop at 42...but that's a whole other thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 11:07 AM
 
Location: North Andover
550 posts, read 680,716 times
Reputation: 583
We where both 23 when we got married. Had our daughter at 27 and now I'm due with my second next month and I'm 34. Been married 11 years and have no regrets about getting married at 23.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 11:10 AM
 
Location: North Andover
550 posts, read 680,716 times
Reputation: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatsnext75 View Post
i think some people push the limits with when they can/should have children quite honestly. I think women should stop at 42...but that's a whole other thread.
I would say stop before you are 40. I want to make sure I'm around for my children for a while.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Massachusetts

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top