Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Montana
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-26-2007, 07:18 PM
 
33 posts, read 60,312 times
Reputation: 25

Advertisements

Howdy,

I see the powers that be have designs for a coal plant near Great Falls. What's the latest with this? Will it actually go through?

Just so you know, IMHO, this will be disastrous for the beautiful and historic Upper Missouri River basin.

Is there any opposition to a large coal burner in Great Falls?

Thanks for your interest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-26-2007, 09:22 PM
 
Location: Boilermaker Territory
26,404 posts, read 46,544,081 times
Reputation: 19539
Montana should develop wind energy, especially in areas with high wind speeds. Other states in the Great Plains are really starting to develop more wind farms recently as they build more high voltage transmission lines. Coal plants are the worst. I would take a nuclear plant any day of the week. Safety standards are very high and nuclear does not create CO2, SO2, NO2, and mercury.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2007, 10:28 PM
 
922 posts, read 1,908,230 times
Reputation: 507
If we had not killed all the buffalo off we could be burning buffalo chips. renewable and natural. wind mills are overblown, it takes Alot of them to supply power to the demands we have. also people seem to dislike there looks, supposedly noisy, not. and they are killing alot of birds personally I do like nukes, power plants too. as for coal, they burn alot cleaner than just 20yrs ago. I say build it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2007, 09:05 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 26,996,167 times
Reputation: 15645
I think the last I read is it was approved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2007, 04:17 PM
 
Location: In The Outland
6,023 posts, read 14,059,923 times
Reputation: 3535
Coal fired power generation plants are responsible for the mercury contamination in the local lake dwelling fish. It's in the acid rain and it makes me want to throw them all back ! It's the same reason I substitute sardine fillets for tuna anymore when I'm making a tuna noodle casserole or a tuna sandwich. I still like to eat small stream young brookies or the like, but the big lake macs are off limits for me from now on, they are just too polluted. Just look at the states fish consumption guidelines. Go nukes and bail the coal plants is what I say.

Last edited by Rickers; 11-27-2007 at 04:26 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2007, 07:50 PM
 
Location: Spots Wyoming
18,700 posts, read 42,041,465 times
Reputation: 2147483647
I've seen coal plants crop up. It's not so bad. You can kind of smell the coal, but it's not that unpleasant. It's needed for power, for now. We have the great pleasure of low sulfur coal. May stink a bit, but it's the way we have to burn. Power, that's what the community needs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2007, 11:54 PM
 
922 posts, read 1,908,230 times
Reputation: 507
Default burning coal

In chehalis, wa. there is a coal plant. they import coal from wyoming. its on the west side south of olympia. you dont know its there and supplys to more people than mt has.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2007, 03:31 AM
 
Location: Spots Wyoming
18,700 posts, read 42,041,465 times
Reputation: 2147483647
Are you aware that Pennsylvania is the largest buyer of Wyoming Coal? They are the biggest supplier, but it's high sulfer coal so they can't sell what they want. So they purchase Wyoming low sulfer coal. Just from Sheridan alone, 9-10 trains a day, loaded with coal, head for Penn. 110 cars of over 100 ton go every day. Tell me that's not making a hole in the ground.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2007, 01:12 AM
 
922 posts, read 1,908,230 times
Reputation: 507
the coal in chehalis for now got tobe too expense to mine compared to WY stuff. some day when man is gone there will be a very big hole.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2007, 05:06 AM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 26,996,167 times
Reputation: 15645
If we could just get people over the heebie jeebies nuke is the way to go...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Montana
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top