Quote:
Originally Posted by zman0
And that burden of proof is whatever the prosecutor decides is enough. Although it would be more appropriate to say there is evidence sufficient to prove that a crime was committed and that the defendant was the one who did it.
Part two is satisfied. She took out the loans. I'm saying, based on the OP's story, that there's sufficient evidence to prove a crime was committed. Additional evidence may tilt the balance the other way, but right now there's enough for probable cause.
|
If she made payments against any of that debt then there is absolutely no case for fraud... sorry dude but as much of a case you present and think that exists here, a DA looks at it much differently !
I'm gonna go out on a huge limb here and say that she happened to make a payment or two. One simply doesn't acquire a mortgage, second mortgage and credit cards by not making some sort of payments along the line in a responsible un-fraudulent manner...
As much as I would really LOVE to see individuals that play this game be held accountable for their actions, it just never and isn't going to happen.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
