Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-17-2018, 09:28 AM
 
2,691 posts, read 4,329,886 times
Reputation: 2311

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexaMatthews View Post
@OP,

NEVER! Never been denied restroom access in my entire life. In fact, most retail establishments offer me restroom usage. Do you think its cause I'm the other white meat?

Do you think what happened at Starbucks had to do with their appearance? Meaning their clothes? I have people confide in me and they've mentioned corn rolls and sweat pants have negative connotations and it makes them feel uncomfortable. Maybe the 2 guys said something to the manager that made him/her feel uncomfortable? We'll just never know.
Yes, what happened to them had to do with the appearance of their skin. Let’s not try to explain this away as anything else than what it is: discrimination/racism. Once you start saying “but they were...” you’re looking for ways to excuse the racist behavior.

The men were in the store waiting for someone and one of them wanted to use the bathroom while he was waiting. They were (literally) arrested for waiting in a store. This is a classic case of implicit bias. If you don’t find this problematic, you’re part of the problem. Keep in mind, plenty of (white) people were in the store witnessing this and found it problematic enough to film it and post it online.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-17-2018, 09:39 AM
 
2,179 posts, read 1,862,037 times
Reputation: 773
Quote:
Originally Posted by jad2k View Post
Yes, what happened to them had to do with the appearance of their skin. Let’s not try to explain this away as anything else than what it is: discrimination/racism. Once you start saying “but they were...” you’re looking for ways to excuse the racist behavior.

The men were in the store waiting for someone and one of them wanted to use the bathroom while he was waiting. They were (literally) arrested for waiting in a store. This is a classic case of implicit bias. If you don’t find this problematic, you’re part of the problem. Keep in mind, plenty of (white) people were in the store witnessing this and found it problematic enough to film it and post it online.
This - amazing looking at the "lets explain this away" crap I see posted on here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2018, 09:43 AM
 
243 posts, read 310,063 times
Reputation: 95
The video shows what it wants to show. We are not sure if they had a verbal altercation of some kind with the manager when asking to use the restroom. Just try to keep an open mind that not everything was shown in the news, nor would we ever know unless we witnessed the entire thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2018, 09:48 AM
 
12,340 posts, read 26,127,760 times
Reputation: 10351
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexaMatthews View Post
The video shows what it wants to show. We are not sure if they had a verbal altercation of some kind with the manager when asking to use the restroom. Just try to keep an open mind that not everything was shown in the news, nor would we ever know unless we witnessed the entire thing.
It seems like you're determined to cast blame on the victims.

Witness accounts all said the men did nothing wrong. And the video of their arrests show them being polite and silent. So I'm not sure why you need to make up your own narrative, but I'm guessing it's because you're suffering from the same bias the manager and the police were suffering from.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2018, 11:07 AM
 
3,041 posts, read 5,000,435 times
Reputation: 3324
Quote:
Originally Posted by NyWriterdude View Post

a retail employee CANNOT discriminate on customers based on appearance.

Retail stores can say anyone who uses the bathroom has to be a customer or they can say they don't have a public bathroom. But they can't treat customers differently for any reason, PERIOD.
Yes, stores absolutely can discriminate based on dress, which is not a protected class. Restaurants that require suit and tie. No gang colors or wife beaters at clubs. Retail banks let high value clients use their non-public bathrooms. See how they treat you at Tourneau if you go in wearing a fast food uniform vs a Patek Phillipe.

Your statements are compete nonsense.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2018, 11:13 AM
 
Location: Harlem, NY
7,906 posts, read 7,884,218 times
Reputation: 4152
Yeah, they do this bullsh it (especially at Starbucks) where you gotta purchase somethin to get the code for the bathroom, or u will be denied access. The one on 14th & 8th lets you go with not a problem. Before they went easy on minute quality of life issues such as peeing in public, it’s like u are caught between a rock and a hard place. Try and use the bathroom indoors, or go out in public, do what u need to do, the 12 roll up and pop u with a ticket
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2018, 11:33 AM
 
243 posts, read 310,063 times
Reputation: 95
Some McDonald locations require a purchase as well.

I was asking NYWriterDude to be opened minded, but he declined. As I wrote before, we'll never know if something as a verbal exchange happened prior to them sitting down where the manager felt threaten in some way. We'll just never know. It is also ludicrous to say everyone saw what transpired from point a to z. Not true. How could a patron sitting down, drinking coffee, ever see what verbal exchange happened at the register?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2018, 11:41 AM
 
Location: New York, NY
12,789 posts, read 8,288,555 times
Reputation: 7107
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexaMatthews View Post
@NyWriterDude,

No one is asking anyone to come dressed in a suit to have coffee. But people need to cognizant of their own appearance because it's the first thing anyone sees. If someone sees that individual dressed a certain way, that person may immediately make negative assumptions of that person in a particular way. Same thing when Obama said: "Pull your pants up!"

No reason why certain people have their pants hanging half off. I understand they want to come off hardcore and have street cred, but that equals getting treated a certain way. Just like no one would ever show up to job interview in grey sweatpants, but believe it or not...it happens.

I received a call for a potential candidate the other day and the person greeted me on the phone with: YO! I answered and she replied: I'm looking for any part time positions open. OMG!!! If I knew you were a live person I wouldn't have greeted you on the phone with YO! I politely accepted her resume, but as soon as the hiring manager heard what happened....the resume got thrown in the garbage. People have to be really aware of their presentation and how it can make someone feel.

Obviously in the Trayvon Martin case, the alleged cop felt a certain way by seeing sweatpants and a hoody. Negative connotations.
I agree with what you're saying to a point. Having watched the video and read numerous reports about the incident in Philadelphia, I think what happened was these two men came in dressed a certain way (I have to be frank in saying that they were dressed like crap considering that they were supposed to be real estate agents (I mean really who dresses like that for a business meeting?)), went and asked to use the bathroom and were told that they needed to buy something to do so or they were trespassing.

I believe that the way they were dressed definitely played a role in how they were treated. If they had just come in and waited for their friend and not have asked to use the bathroom, I think that perhaps we wouldn't have heard about this because let's face it, LOTS of people go into Starbucks and sit there for hours and don't order anything, but these two pressed the issue by asking to use the bathroom but refused to buy anything, so yes, technically they were trespassing, but I think they were also prejudged and likely viewed as a threat and that's a problem that happens in a lot of establishments. I see it all of the time as a young person.

Sometimes I go to places and the assumption is that I must be broke because I'm young or you can't afford that because you're young, and when you can, the person may become angry as a result out of envy. Starbucks is saying that they're going to retrain their employees, but people are people. You can re-train them all you want. If they have biases, no amount of training can change that.

Last edited by pierrepont7731; 04-17-2018 at 12:02 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2018, 11:49 AM
 
9,329 posts, read 4,140,268 times
Reputation: 8224
No, but it may depend on your appearance and attitude. If I'm dressed decently and politely ask, it's fine. If I looked like a bag lady and appeared to be drunk, the reaction might be different.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-17-2018, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Boston
20,104 posts, read 9,011,934 times
Reputation: 18759
Don't feel one way or another about Starbucks, their coffee tastes burnt to me. All I can say is if I go into ANY coffee shop, buy something and find there is not place to sit because it's populated by non-paying customers, I'll never shop there again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New York > New York City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top