|

05-13-2009, 07:33 AM
|
|
Curmudgeon
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Pawnee Nation
3,892 posts, read 2,117,694 times
Reputation: 2209
|
|
Why do we have to have comparisons?
There is a thread on whether or not Shawnee is like Austin, several on how Tulsa and OKC are the same, several on how they are different, lots of posts about whether Oklahoma is southern, western, mid-western.
Let me let you in on a secret...Tulsa is like Tulsa. OKC is like OKC. They are not like Phoenix or Little Rock or Birmingham or Austin or San Antonio. Oklahoma is not western, it is not southern, it is not mid-western. IT is Oklahoma. You can find elements of all of the above in all of the above.
It is easy to tell the various places apart. They have different names, they are located in different places, and they are inhabited by different people.
do you think we can get past the " _______ is like ________ only different" nonsense?
Tulsa is a great little city. OKC is a great little city. Can't we leave it at that? If you have to expound, talk about what makes them great. Talk about thier liabilities. But don't try to talk about how because Bricktown has a canal that it is like San Antonio......it is misleading.........
|
|

05-13-2009, 11:37 AM
|
|
Who Do You Trust?
Status:
"Okie-Jersey Girl"
(set 26 days ago)
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In My Own Little World. . .
3,203 posts, read 1,943,798 times
Reputation: 1374
|
|
So true. I've been all over the country, and I have NEVER seen a city I could compare to another city. They all have their own flavor, culture and presence. Phoenix is just Phoenix, Reno is just Reno, and Oklahoma City is just that. Oklahoma City. Don't much care what section of the country we've been designated as. 
|
|

05-13-2009, 11:46 AM
|
|
I'm not there because I'm here
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
3,208 posts, read 1,799,013 times
Reputation: 896
|
|
|
The whole comparison thing reminds me of high school. I had an American history teacher whose tests were usually like this: "Compare and contrast Administration X with Administration Y. You have one hour. Be bright."
|
|

05-13-2009, 03:31 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Stillwater
2,453 posts, read 1,327,989 times
Reputation: 660
|
|
|
I don't get describing Oklahoma City and Tulsa as little unless you're thinking of comparing them to New York City, Chicago, or LA.
|
|

05-13-2009, 03:45 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Between a rock and a hard place.
292 posts, read 88,128 times
Reputation: 158
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodpasture
There is a thread on whether or not Shawnee is like Austin, several on how Tulsa and OKC are the same, several on how they are different, lots of posts about whether Oklahoma is southern, western, mid-western.
Let me let you in on a secret...Tulsa is like Tulsa. OKC is like OKC. They are not like Phoenix or Little Rock or Birmingham or Austin or San Antonio. Oklahoma is not western, it is not southern, it is not mid-western. IT is Oklahoma. You can find elements of all of the above in all of the above.
It is easy to tell the various places apart. They have different names, they are located in different places, and they are inhabited by different people.
do you think we can get past the " _______ is like ________ only different" nonsense?
Tulsa is a great little city. OKC is a great little city. Can't we leave it at that? If you have to expound, talk about what makes them great. Talk about thier liabilities. But don't try to talk about how because Bricktown has a canal that it is like San Antonio......it is misleading.........
|
Goodpasture, I see your point, but I notice in other state forums, they do it all the time, because people are trying to gauge an idea of what one area is like, over another, and will it be a good fit. I.E. if you like..such and such town, in another state, you may like, this town, in this state, as opposed to the other town, in the same state.
Granted, I can see how people, become irritated, when you make, drastic comparisons, I.E. living in Cali and putting down Idaho.
The trick is, find a similar place in, i.e. Idaho, if possible. 
|
|

05-13-2009, 03:50 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Between a rock and a hard place.
292 posts, read 88,128 times
Reputation: 158
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie
I don't get describing Oklahoma City and Tulsa as little unless you're thinking of comparing them to New York City, Chicago, or LA.
|
More than likely they mean, the amount of people per sq foot, density thing. A city here, and a city somewhere else, may be same size, land wise, but the number of people living here, or there, may be sizably different.
|
|

05-13-2009, 05:08 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SandFlats
358 posts, read 114,864 times
Reputation: 120
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie
I don't get describing Oklahoma City and Tulsa as little unless you're thinking of comparing them to New York City, Chicago, or LA.
|
Even compared to NYC , Oklahhoma City is not little
|
|

05-13-2009, 05:58 PM
|
|
Get rid of that stinkin thinkin!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fort Worth/Dallas
11,911 posts, read 9,268,629 times
Reputation: 4738
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjwebbster
Even compared to NYC , Oklahhoma City is not little
|
At about 1/20th the size, it is relatively small. Have you ever been to NYC? It's huge. Oklahoma City, IMO, is not a small city, but in comparison to the Big Apple it's quite tiny.
But I prefer smaller cities. The DFW area is way too big for me at nearly 7 million people.
|
|

05-13-2009, 06:20 PM
|
|
Why do Grandbabies grow so FAST??
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Duncan, OK
2,690 posts, read 1,509,092 times
Reputation: 2594
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Synopsis
At about 1/20th the size, it is relatively small. Have you ever been to NYC? It's huge. Oklahoma City, IMO, is not a small city, but in comparison to the Big Apple it's quite tiny.
But I prefer smaller cities. The DFW area is way too big for me at nearly 7 million people.
|
 Are you talking about population or physical size? (Square Miles)
NYC is 303.3 square miles, and OKC is 607.0 square miles. Obviously population density would put NYC waaaay ahead though. 
__________________
Above all else... Be NICE! and read the TOS.
|
|

05-13-2009, 06:26 PM
|
|
Get rid of that stinkin thinkin!
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fort Worth/Dallas
11,911 posts, read 9,268,629 times
Reputation: 4738
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyRobyn
 Are you talking about population or physical size? (Square Miles)
NYC is 303.3 square miles, and OKC is 607.0 square miles. Obviously population density would put NYC waaaay ahead though. 
|
I'm sure he's talking about population, although I don't know if you are joking or not cuz you're a tuff nut to crack! 
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|