Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-16-2018, 04:15 PM
 
29,518 posts, read 22,661,647 times
Reputation: 48236

Advertisements

Depends on the person and their job/finances and other factors of course.

People slam idea that you should save 'twice your salary' by age 35 - Business Insider

Quote:
A Marktwatch article claiming "you should have twice your salary saved" by the time you're 35 years old has angered the internet. The article, which included advice from Boston-based investment firm Fidelity Investments, said you should have a year's worth of salary saved up by age 30, and double that by age 35.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-16-2018, 04:50 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia/South Jersey area
3,677 posts, read 2,562,078 times
Reputation: 12467
These article IMO do nothing but depress folks and make them mad, which is evident from the replies.!!

Pretty much the same nonsense about no one should retire without 1 million dollars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2018, 05:32 PM
 
998 posts, read 1,237,760 times
Reputation: 1512
Quote:
Originally Posted by eliza61nyc View Post
Pretty much the same nonsense about no one should retire without 1 million dollars.
$3,000,000 would be better (for someone who wants to retire in 2020-25, has no pension or funded health care during retirement, and doesn't have a huge amount of assets {$1 mm+ house to sell} and wants to maintain a lifestyle between middle-class and upper-middle-class in a medium cost of living area)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2018, 05:34 PM
 
2,360 posts, read 1,915,817 times
Reputation: 2118
if your banking 200k a year then it wont be hard for some. but other then that, they are a investment firm and wants your money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2018, 06:30 AM
 
7,899 posts, read 7,113,478 times
Reputation: 18603
Quote:
Originally Posted by eliza61nyc View Post
These article IMO do nothing but depress folks and make them mad, which is evident from the replies.!!

Pretty much the same nonsense about no one should retire without 1 million dollars.
This is not nonsense. The median household income is $56K. Let us say it is going to take $45K to maintain that standard of living in retirement. The median social security benefit is $16K leaving a gap of $29K. Using 4% as a safe withdrawal rate, the median amount of savings needed would be $750K. Anyone in their 50s who is planning for retirement better be looking to save at least $1 million in order to maintain a median level lifestyle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2018, 06:38 AM
 
7,687 posts, read 5,122,942 times
Reputation: 5482
Too many foolish millenials getting degrees in gender studies and womens studies
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2018, 07:33 AM
 
Location: Florida -
10,213 posts, read 14,836,946 times
Reputation: 21848
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrkliny View Post
This is not nonsense. The median household income is $56K. Let us say it is going to take $45K to maintain that standard of living in retirement. The median social security benefit is $16K leaving a gap of $29K. Using 4% as a safe withdrawal rate, the median amount of savings needed would be $750K. Anyone in their 50s who is planning for retirement better be looking to save at least $1 million in order to maintain a median level lifestyle.
Agreed! - The real nonsense is the notion that 'reality must change to accommodate the outrage of the day.'
The suggestion that one should have 2X their salary in their retirement account by age 35 is not far fetched at all. How one "feels" about this changes nothing.

The whimsical philosophy that creates such outrage is: "Retirement is too far off for someone 35 to think or worry about and There will always be time to save later." Those foolish enough to buy into this philosophy may find themselves at 50, thinking the same thing. The sooner, the better when it comes to retirement savings, PARTICULARLY if one is in a lower income bracket (compounding).

Yes, some financial management companies proclaim (or infer) that unless one has several million upon retirement ... they will live under a bridge and eat cat food. In this area, one must exercise some common sense and not believe every advertising claim .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2018, 07:41 AM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,468 posts, read 61,406,816 times
Reputation: 30414
I am 59 now, thinking back when I was 35 we must have been fairly close to having 2X my annual income invested in our portfolio.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2018, 07:46 AM
 
2,605 posts, read 2,712,440 times
Reputation: 3550
I read about this concept the year I turned 30 and honestly, I didn't think it was high enough. Of course jumping from 30 (with x income) to 35 (double your income) seem like bigger jump. But investing tends to jump faster assuming economy is good. I think most people should be able to save a year of their income by 30.

By 30, most people have worked for a decade already, that is
(10years * 52 weeks/year) = 520 weeks/year
Median salary is 50K so
$50,000/520 weeks = $96.15 per paycheck.

This is not including interest rate or bonus people get. It can be hard some week but most people should be able to tuck away 96 per paycheck
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-17-2018, 07:49 AM
 
106,679 posts, read 108,856,202 times
Reputation: 80164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner View Post
I am 59 now, thinking back when I was 35 we must have been fairly close to having 2X my annual income invested in our portfolio.
same here
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top