Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-22-2015, 07:11 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,766,520 times
Reputation: 16993

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lacerta View Post
How else do you expect people to calculate their current net worth other than by estimating value of assets?


Net worth includes home equity, which, by definition is always going to be on paper, and not actual.


I would never take a cash out refi against assets unless it was an absolute crisis. Given that I have a secure emergency fund, 2 Roth IRAs that I could pull against first, and excellent health insurance, and that I live far below my means, I can't imagine getting to that point.
I would ignore that statement made by petch751, it sounds like this poster doesn't understand the concept of networth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-23-2015, 07:34 AM
 
4,196 posts, read 6,300,293 times
Reputation: 2835
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
Be careful how you view your net worth. You are including paper appreciation, not realized appreciation. People who thought that way before 2008 got themselves into trouble and it came crashing down in 2008.
Come again?
Net worth fluctuates with the 'value' of your assets, just as it does with the amount of 'debt' you have. If you go to a casino at a high-roller table and get 100k credit and lose it, and request another 50k to play with, did your net worth just go down by 100k or not? of course it did. Same concept for when you're UP at the same casino (or housing market, or stocks, or anything else).

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2015, 08:33 AM
 
3,050 posts, read 4,995,125 times
Reputation: 3780
Late bloomer. Divorced twice. Single. Age 45. $150K net worth. I count alimony owed as debt, not sure if that is accurate accounting.


Software. North Carolina. Still hope to retire at 60.


(It was $0 two years ago!)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2015, 09:08 AM
 
5,342 posts, read 6,170,171 times
Reputation: 4719
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinking-man View Post
Come again?
Net worth fluctuates with the 'value' of your assets, just as it does with the amount of 'debt' you have. If you go to a casino at a high-roller table and get 100k credit and lose it, and request another 50k to play with, did your net worth just go down by 100k or not? of course it did. Same concept for when you're UP at the same casino (or housing market, or stocks, or anything else).

Even if you have it in the US dollar your networth changes based on currency valuations and inflation. So, the comment by Petch was essentially useless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2015, 10:24 AM
 
906 posts, read 1,767,791 times
Reputation: 1068
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thinking-man View Post
Come again?
Net worth fluctuates with the 'value' of your assets, just as it does with the amount of 'debt' you have. If you go to a casino at a high-roller table and get 100k credit and lose it, and request another 50k to play with, did your net worth just go down by 100k or not? of course it did. Same concept for when you're UP at the same casino (or housing market, or stocks, or anything else).

Absolutely spot on. There is no such thing as paper appreciation and paper losses. They are real gains and real losses as the value of assets change over time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2015, 01:46 PM
 
Location: NJ
133 posts, read 312,060 times
Reputation: 178
I would be curious to know how folks are factoring in taxes on tax advantaged accounts. Just looking at a balance doesn't tell the full story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2015, 01:54 PM
 
26,192 posts, read 21,601,431 times
Reputation: 22772
Quote:
Originally Posted by CometV6787 View Post
I would be curious to know how folks are factoring in taxes on tax advantaged accounts. Just looking at a balance doesn't tell the full story.

It's not factored in because it's an unknown. You also don't know what capital gains tax might be on a sale of your primary residence in the future either or if Roth IRAs face some sort of tax. For that reason you simply work off an asset number
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2015, 12:52 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,750,585 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lacerta View Post

I would never take a cash out refi against assets unless it was an absolute crisis.
But that's what many people did. They were told they're net worth was higher, (higher equity in their homes) so they used their house as banks and took out 2nd mortgages. When the housing market crashed their home value was lower than what they owed on 1st and 2nd mortgages so they were underwater.

Some people include home values in their net worth but that's based on projected value during a period of time. I understand this thinking but prefer to split it. If I have $1.2 million in cash an investments, hopefully the market doesn't crash and tomorrow that will be my net worth - money owed. Then because the home is harder to sell but does have equity I think of that different. They could tell me it's worth $500K but in a week market I may have to drop it to sell, then there's all the fees of selling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2015, 01:01 PM
 
106,708 posts, read 108,913,061 times
Reputation: 80199
poor investor behavior has nothing to do with what the value of anything is at any given point in time . these folks didn't just wake up one morning to find their houses were worth 30% less and if they did shame on them for not paying attention if they were near retirement and that house was their piggy bank .

most of us would know well before that our houses were falling because we would track things yearly if we were that close to retirement and things that critical .

what you are counting vary's as to the reason you are counting it .

basing a retirement income ? then it is based on today's values of liquid assets when setting withdrawals off a portfolio .

until you actually sell real estate though you can't set spending limits but for purposes of net worth but no harm in ball parking it . as prices change you need to change with it . people only over valued their real estate in projections because they didn't stay on top of it value wise or they would have known things are a lot less as they re-figured each year. .

we counted on our real estate for retirement but we also started liquidating 10 years ago .

no spending budgets were set until right before we retired and we saw what we actually had .

Last edited by mathjak107; 12-24-2015 at 01:13 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2015, 01:21 PM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,929,235 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
But that's what many people did. They were told they're net worth was higher, (higher equity in their homes) so they used their house as banks and took out 2nd mortgages. When the housing market crashed their home value was lower than what they owed on 1st and 2nd mortgages so they were underwater.

Some people include home values in their net worth but that's based on projected value during a period of time. I understand this thinking but prefer to split it. If I have $1.2 million in cash an investments, hopefully the market doesn't crash and tomorrow that will be my net worth - money owed. Then because the home is harder to sell but does have equity I think of that different. They could tell me it's worth $500K but in a week market I may have to drop it to sell, then there's all the fees of selling.
Home value is what it is worth on the market today, not what you think it will be worth. Just the same as any other asset class. A home is only harder to sell if the seller is holding out for a price above market. You factor fees into the calculation in the same way you factor commission on selling stocks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Economics > Personal Finance
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top