Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-08-2013, 02:11 PM
 
Location: Currently living in Reddit
5,652 posts, read 6,987,846 times
Reputation: 7323

Advertisements

This question to only those who live/have lived in a valley in the South Hills.

I need to get a new phone, probably getting a Galaxy. However, in the 11 years I've lived at the bottom of my particular valley, I haven't had much luck with getting a consistent signal. I've had Verizon & Sprint, so I know those didn't work. I'm OK not getting an unlocked phone, but I need to know for sure that the carrier will be useful at home.

If you live in a valley in the South Hills and have had luck with a specific carrier, please advise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-08-2013, 03:43 PM
 
Location: North Oakland
9,150 posts, read 10,894,540 times
Reputation: 14503
I thought you'd be talking about the San Hernando Valley.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 06:20 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh area
9,912 posts, read 24,657,658 times
Reputation: 5164
Okay, yeah, I haven't lived there.

But well, that leaves you AT&T or T-Mobile basically. I don't know if there are others with specific facilities of their own that would be different; I think all the others lease their airtime from one of those guys don't they?

AFAIK you can still get a 15- or 30-day trial with these carriers, which is the best way to try them out for sure. Small differences in location can make or break whether you get a signal at home or not. AT&T (and maybe others) also offers a way to boost the signal at home with a device that plugs into a home broadband line.

It is interesting to note that Sprint and Verizon use the same type of wireless technology (CDMA) so it's possible that one of the other two, which don't, will have a different effect in the valley. Yeah, everyone is going to LTE eventually, but there can still be differences due to the different frequencies.

T-Mobile has a nice way of pricing now seems like. I think I'd give them a try. We're actually going to try it here (not me, my phone is through work, but my other half will try it) now that they have iPhone. Plus they're making it dead easy to trade in old iPhone for new one at better cost than others. (Zero dollars upfront, sweet.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 07:28 PM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,544,279 times
Reputation: 6392
T Mobile has terrible coverage in the Pittsburgh area, including the South Hills.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 07:33 PM
 
43,011 posts, read 108,049,575 times
Reputation: 30721
When was the last time you used Verizon? It has the best coverage locally and nationally. If it has been 10 years, I recommend you give it another chance. But ask your neighbors what they are using first. They truly are your best gauge since they live right in the same valley.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 09:23 PM
 
Location: Pittsburgh area
9,912 posts, read 24,657,658 times
Reputation: 5164
Aggregate "best coverage" is useless if you live in a hole in xyz company's best coverage.

I expect to be, well, to share a house with a personal guinea pig of T-Mobile's current coverage. My personal experience from several years ago was fine; I didn't switch due to coverage. Back then I stupidly wanted some specific type of phone that was on Cingular.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2013, 11:44 PM
 
43,011 posts, read 108,049,575 times
Reputation: 30721
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg42 View Post
Aggregate "best coverage" is useless if you live in a hole in xyz company's best coverage.
For people who travel, national coverage is important. If you have a home phone, it doesn't really matter if you have coverage at home if being able to be reached while traveling is important. Regardless, I asked how long ago he tried Verizon because the hole might have been fixed since then. I never have dropped calls wherever I'm driving. My friends' phones are always dropping calls and they have various other providers. I'm not trying to push Verizon. It's the plan that worked best for us because my husband travels. I do know that we have much better coverage than we did 10 years ago. If I lived in a hole and coverage in the hole was important, I'd be asking other people who live in the hole by walking outside on a nice day and chatting up neighbors who are out working in their yards.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2013, 06:13 AM
 
Location: Currently living in Reddit
5,652 posts, read 6,987,846 times
Reputation: 7323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hopes View Post
When was the last time you used Verizon? It has the best coverage locally and nationally. If it has been 10 years, I recommend you give it another chance. But ask your neighbors what they are using first. They truly are your best gauge since they live right in the same valley.
Good point. Immediate next door neighbor uses landline in the house. Most others nabes are pretty old. Every contractor I've had in here has to go outside to the street to make a call.

I last had Verizon in 2009. Tossed my old smartphone when I didn't need it anymore for old-school flip on a monthly thru Virgin.

I like Greg's suggestion of 30-day trial. Wish I knew of a website to put in a GPS location and see signal strength.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2013, 10:30 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh area
9,912 posts, read 24,657,658 times
Reputation: 5164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hopes View Post
For people who travel, national coverage is important. If you have a home phone, it doesn't really matter if you have coverage at home if being able to be reached while traveling is important. Regardless, I asked how long ago he tried Verizon because the hole might have been fixed since then. I never have dropped calls wherever I'm driving. My friends' phones are always dropping calls and they have various other providers. I'm not trying to push Verizon. It's the plan that worked best for us because my husband travels. I do know that we have much better coverage than we did 10 years ago. If I lived in a hole and coverage in the hole was important, I'd be asking other people who live in the hole by walking outside on a nice day and chatting up neighbors who are out working in their yards.
Hey, he specifically asked about coverage at his house. That's why I wrote that. A home phone is pretty much a waste of money. Even my elderly parents have ditched them.

Unless your travel takes you routinely to the sticks in the western US, they all have national coverage that will be spotty in some places and great in others, with some carriers being better in some areas and some better in others. That's just the way it is, regardless of Verizon's marketing. There's not even really anything untrue about Verizon's marketing, it's just that thinking of it as an absolute "don't consider anyone else if you travel a lot" is foolish. (Don't worry, I know that isn't what you said, but it is what many people imply.) There are a variety of reasons to choose another one, one of which is coverage at your own house. Another is coverage in a specific spot that you travel to often. Another is cost and/or better contract terms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2013, 10:33 AM
 
Location: Pittsburgh area
9,912 posts, read 24,657,658 times
Reputation: 5164
Quote:
Originally Posted by sskink View Post
I like Greg's suggestion of 30-day trial. Wish I knew of a website to put in a GPS location and see signal strength.
Based on a personally known sketchy area for AT&T coverage in Mass, the T-Mobile coverage map could be more honest than the AT&T one. (T-Mobile shows a falloff in their coverage there, whereas AT&T claims it to be strong.)

That's the only anecdote I really have about the carriers' coverage maps though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Pennsylvania > Pittsburgh
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:06 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top