Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-24-2010, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,384,306 times
Reputation: 73937

Advertisements

It's a weird question.

You're basically asking,

"If I decide people doing better at this specific test defines them as smarter, aren't they smarter?"

You have to subjectively decide what defines intelligence and then try to squeeze people and define them by those parameters. Self-fulfilling prophecy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-24-2010, 11:29 AM
 
6,993 posts, read 6,340,548 times
Reputation: 2824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
Secondly, the study you linked is not accurate in its representation of intelligence levels of the top performers.

Marginal Revolution: Summers Vindicated (again)


In the top tiers of intelligence, we should expect there to be at least 3 males for every female
.
According to the comments following the above posted link, the accuracy of the study is open to interpretation. Just one example:
Quote:
For a simple example, click through to the Science article and you'll see that in White children, the M/F upper tail ratio is 2.0 -- meaning twice as many white boys >99% than girls. However, with an admittedly smaller Asian sample, the ratio is 1.0 (same numbers of boys & girls >99%). It's not impossible that this difference also has some genetic basis, but it's also entirely possible that some (White) families nurture their boys with math aptitude more than their girls.

Both genes and culture have big effects on outcomes. It's pretty stupid to ignore either of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-24-2010, 11:41 AM
 
1,179 posts, read 975,926 times
Reputation: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redshadowz View Post
It is a well-known fact that men(as a group) are innately better at math than women, because of genetic differences between men and women.

Are Men Better at Math? - Associated Content - associatedcontent.com

And this gap is not cultural, so it cannot be erased through any program or policy devised by society. And if most IQ tests seem to focus mostly on visuo-spatial ability, such as this IQ test(and most others).

http://iqtest.dk/main.swf

And if the highest performers on IQ tests are even more disproportionately male than would be indicated by the overall male/female IQ divide. And if having a high IQ, and possessing abilities in math and sciences have the highest value in our society, and should correlate with higher wages and success. Then, if all things are equal, shouldn't women basically be almost second-class human beings in our social structure?

So if it could be said that any equality between men and women can only exist through artificial means. Because men and women are inherently unequal. Then all talk of equality between men and women should be scoffed at as the ridiculous non-sense it is. And completely ignored as pure fantasy.

How does this make women feel?
These are the kinds of posts you whip up when you can't get a date again. Could their be a correlation? You decide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:49 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top