Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-18-2010, 01:22 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
His silence is deafening and it is obvious why he is not weighing in. One would have to have a very low IQ not to see the partisan hypocrisy. He's received his orders to shut up on the issue from the right wing powers that be. The man without integrity who will forever be the worst POTUS in history...bar none. Keep your low profile Bush Jr. We've seen enough of and heard enough from you to last many lifetimes.
Tell me, what issue has he weighed in on since obama took office?

Let's see the list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-18-2010, 01:26 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
It seems to me to be an altogether stupid position to take that liberal journalists shouldn't want to hear what conservative politicians have to say. They're journalists, for heaven's sake. Of course they would like George W Bush to weigh in on this issue. His comments would be NEWS. Their job is reporting and commenting on NEWS.
These are the same journalist who couldn't wait for Bush to leave, who mocked and denigrated his "stubborness", who never had a good word to say about him.....and suddenly, they are looking for some leadership, clarity and decisiveness to pull obama butt out of his self-induced cooker.

The Left hasn't wanted to hear from Bush at all since leaving office.

What a bunch of desperate hypocrites these journalists are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2010, 01:26 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,894,256 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
I think you missed her point. She seemed to be stating that the MSM haven't put a solid foot forth in investigating this President, not that they haven't reported the news at all.
I think you're hedging for her. She said the MSM hasn't reported the news. Would you like to go back and read her post? She was making a ridiculous assertion. She got called on it. Deservedly so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2010, 01:29 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,894,256 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
These are the same journalist who couldn't wait for Bush to leave, who mocked and denigrated his "stubborness", who never had a good word to say about him.....and suddenly, they are looking for some leadership, clarity and decisiveness to pull obama butt out of his self-induced cooker.
So what? They were reporting on him then, they report on him now. Let's not be simple here. When our previous Presidents wish to speak out, newspeople report on their remarks. Left-wing journalist, conservative journalist, even that miracle-of-miracles an unbiased reporter, they report on the news. Wondering what the previous Presidents might say about hot issues isn't a new thing. Asking them to comment isn't a new thing. And it's stupid to suggest that it is a new thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2010, 01:30 PM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,726,478 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
I suggest you find another thread to amuse yourself if you don't care for the topic. It IS really that simple and much better than just posting to complain about the thread topic...don't you think?

Actually, these are lefties asking Bush to weigh in with clarity and conviction (what the Left used to call stubborness), something that is not forthcoming with obama. They sound disgusted.
Thank you, Sanrene - that needed to be said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2010, 01:36 PM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,726,478 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Liberals have never been known for their extraordinary foresight.
A skillfully understated truth..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2010, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,961,908 times
Reputation: 7118
It is clear the Lefty Journos are very unhappy with obama, especially for his back tracking and waffling.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2010, 01:43 PM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,158,177 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Mosque supporters beg George W. Bush to come to Obama's rescue | Washington Examiner



We have entered the Twilight Zone.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/18/op...d.html?_r=1&hp



She says it's time for Dubya to weight in! Is this not a confirmation of the weakness and pansiness of obama?

Ground Zero Mosque Controversy: America Has Disgraced Itself - The Daily Beast



Face it, obama is AFRAID to weight in with his personal opinion.

Republicans pander over 'Ground Zero mosque' -- Opinion Focus with Eugene Robinson - The Washington Post



To pull obama's skinny butt out of the fire.

Imagine this; Lefty columnists are pining for the resolve and decisiveness of G.W. Bush, in the era of obama.
Obama took a stand,defending the CONSTITUTION (his JOB)...the Constitution that Bush called nothing but a @*&%!X@! piece of paper.



Ya, which side WOULD "BUSHBUSHBUSHBUSHBUSHBUSHBUSH" be on ????.

Your post says two different things...Bush respected other religions, or so your post says, therefore he would ALLOW/CONDONE the building of a mosque close to ground zero....RIGHT!!!!!???????




Now, whenever a Dem/Lib/lefty mentions "BUSHBUSHBUSHBUSHBUSHBUSH"...the rightists get their panties in a wad and want him forgotten....but turn around, FLIPFLOP, when it suits their purpose.....two-face ?? YES!!!!!!


Oh, and A N O T H E R flip flop......touting LEFTY JOURNALISTS??????? I thought you thought they couldn't be believed??????????? NOW YOU ARE A leftist supporter????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2010, 01:45 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,894,256 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
It is clear the Lefty Journos are very unhappy with obama, especially for his back tracking and waffling.
Some journalists think that Obama mishandled this issue. So what? Does that mean that in 2012 they'll line up to vote for Palin. I don't think so.

And as for your remarks about the news not reporting on Bush. Just so far this month, the MSM has had stories about Bush's visit to Haiti, Bush and his wife surprising the troops at an airport in Texas, Bush planning to give a speech at the Olde Farm in Virginia, Bush attending a Yankees-Rangers ballgame, and the upcoming release of Bush's memoirs. For a MSM that's supposedly "didn't want to hear from Bush at all since he left office" (that's word-for-word quote from you, correct?), in 18 days he's sure gotten a fair amount of press coverage. In addition to being asked to weigh in on the Mosque and the Imam Rauf (whom Bush worked closely with to foster better relations between Muslims and the United States).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2010, 01:46 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,949,243 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Very good post. You hit on something I haven't thought about. Obama truly did waste a moment to side with the majority of American's, and he blew it, all in the name of audience approval. Once again, the President forgets that the "audience" is the American people, and it is they who decide his fate. This "Constitutional Professor" of ours really botched the message badly, which is disturbing because the mosque controversy is not even a Constitutional issue.
As a "Constitutional Professer" Obama tries to straddle both sides of any issue until after it is decided. This is not the mark of a leader. Dithering is a weakness that radical Islam and others recognize alike.

It is both respectful and appropriate that Fmr. President G.W. Bush not weigh in on the Ground Zero mosque debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top