Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-17-2010, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,981 posts, read 22,172,656 times
Reputation: 13811

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Once you have enough money that you could not survive eating, screwing or drinking it away why would you want more?

I am mostly annoyed by the fact that most of the wealthy are making their money without having to put in their god given 40 hour work weeks. The wealthy are the other welfare class in this economy and cost far more than the poor.
Such bitterness is not healthy.

If you are speaking to the trust fund babies, they irk a lot of us, but the current tax system hardly affects them at all. The idle rich who booze it up and sail around in their yachts are not the problem in this country. The only way to get these non-productive people to pay taxes is to change the tax code. Fat chance of getting that done as long as we have the crony capitalist, career politicians in control of government. they are the reason that nothing seems to change no matter which political party is in control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2010, 09:38 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,880,765 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jill61 View Post
Oh for crying out loud, it was a stupid and irrelevant question.

The well-being of a nation /= sidling up to a bar with buddies.
LOL...if the 'well being of the nation' was your concern,everyone should be paying in....

I find your difficulty in answering my question troubling,do you not think those richer then you should pay???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2010, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Montgomery County, MD
293 posts, read 570,825 times
Reputation: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
Errr,no.
It is called answering YOUR question...



A millionaire would pay a higher percentage then you,is this okay with you and if it is why is it okay he pay a higher percentage?


"...For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more." Luke 12:48

BUT

"For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat." II Thessalonians 3:10

...for what it's worth...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2010, 10:20 AM
 
Location: My little patch of Earth
6,193 posts, read 5,371,679 times
Reputation: 3059
Quote:
Originally Posted by wade52 View Post
After a millionaire pays his taxes, he's still a millionaire.

I don't see them having much of a cause for whining.
So, exactly how much of other peoples earnings do you want?

Is there a point when you are comfortable by making others pay?

39% isn't enough. How about 45%? 58% 67% 78% - hell, why not 98%?

Do you really think no matter how much this government taxes others they'll give you a bigger share of the take?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2010, 10:56 AM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,949,504 times
Reputation: 11790
Gotta love the class envy that the liberals (or closet socialists maybe) display in this topic. Because it worked sooooo well in the USSR, Cuba, China, North Korea, and the Eastern Bloc? It seems like a lot of the jealous liberals here would rather everyone be poor like them than for them to make it higher. How sad. That's why socialism has failed, you can't make everyone equal no matter how much you dream. I'd rather live in a country where one has the chance of striking gold, instead of no matter how hard he works, he's still gonna be not more than a high school dropout. No thanks. If you want to point fingers, don't point it at the people making under a million dollars a year. Your average small business owner makes under a million per year, not even doctors make that much! Your envy toward people making $250K per year, that could be your surgeon you're talking about. It's funny too, what id Obama had said that people making over $400,000 a year need to pay up. Then you parrots wouldn't be talking about the $250K, you'd be parroting $400K, none of you libs realize it but you're just as guilty as the neo-cons in parroting talking points. Only you don't realize it because you're just repeating what they say from MSNBC, Daily Kos, CPUSA, and Obama. Good riddance
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2010, 11:16 AM
 
5,747 posts, read 12,057,446 times
Reputation: 4512
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
That group pays the most taxes, carries most of the tax burden in the country, uses their money to employ us, pay for our health benefits, and they get nothing in return from the government except they are evil and must pay up even more of what they already shoulder. And they don't qualify for welfare handouts.

Failure of a topic
I got skewered for my opinion about this on another thread, but here goes again. My family of four makes just under that amount annually, and we are not suffering. At. All. Life is very good at this income level.

Mitch McConnell is full of crap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2010, 01:19 PM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,336,651 times
Reputation: 31000
If i'm working in a factory and paying 30% of my pay in taxes i would expect the owner of the factory to be also paying 30% of his income to taxes.
Is there something wrong with that viewpoint?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2010, 01:21 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,685,125 times
Reputation: 7943
Quote:
Originally Posted by jambo101 View Post
If i'm working in a factory and paying 30% of my pay in taxes i would expect the owner of the factory to be also paying 30% of his income to taxes.
Is there something wrong with that viewpoint?
No, but how about this:

The factory worker pays 30% of his income in taxes, but the owner of the factory only pays 15% of his income in taxes because most of his income comes from capital gains and stock profits.

Is that fair?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2010, 01:47 PM
 
35,309 posts, read 52,336,651 times
Reputation: 31000
I dont know much about capital gains and stock profits as i'm just the guy working in the factory, but i do believe the guy at the top should be similarly inconvenienced by taxes as the guy on the bottom..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2010, 02:49 PM
 
2,851 posts, read 3,476,618 times
Reputation: 1200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldawgfan View Post
What twisted words? What exactly are 'we' talking about? Are you suggesting that the decision/ability to have a family should be based on income? Lets just assume that is what you are saying... how do you propose to 'fix' the low income family situation? Sterilization?
If you can't afford it, don't have them. Having other people pay for your children (with that wonderful socail engineering that ohh so much rewards those who are responsible) isn't exactly being parent of the year. Of course there is no real fix, other then ending social engineering and the tax system. But hey, we can all dream and in the meantime I'll be an outspoken critic of stupidity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MsMcQ LV View Post
Raised my family of five on just a bit over that 30k. Maybe we didn't have 'the best' of everything, but we had what we needed. That's the problem I see more and more - no one seems to want anything less than the best, whether they can afford it or actually need it or not.
In most areas, 30K really isn't making it for a family of 4.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Agreed, i take umbrage to that also. I was raised with four siblings, and my mother earned an equivalent of under $30,000. a person should not make a hasty declaration concerning the means in which other people live their lives.
Surely, but at the same time, I take umbrage with child tax credits, earned income credit, WICS, child health plus, and the multitude of other taxpayer-funded systems.

I have no problems with people affording their kids and scraping by on their own, when the taxpayer is required to give a leg up because the parents can't provide, then those people whould not have kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top