Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What should health classes teach kids in school?
Comprehensive sex education 11 61.11%
Abstinence-only sex education 2 11.11%
No sex education at all 5 27.78%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-01-2010, 12:35 PM
 
25,021 posts, read 28,021,060 times
Reputation: 11790

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
It's a health and biology issue too. You can't be educated in human biology if you skip the reproductive organs.

Beyond that the schools have taken it up as a social issue since so many kids DON'T get it from home.
Then concentrate it as a biology issue, not a social issue which so many schools are doing

Is that the schools' problem? No, it's not. The school's primary, and only, responsibility is to EDUCATE our kids in academics, NOT social issues
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-01-2010, 12:37 PM
 
29,980 posts, read 43,049,294 times
Reputation: 12829
The federal government is an abismal failure at education policy. Leave it to the states. Get rid of the Dept. of Education and teachers' union.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-01-2010, 12:50 PM
 
31,384 posts, read 37,158,802 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
Let's just turn them all into sex crazed whores
They are already sex crazed whores, the idea is to teach them to be responsible ones.

Like the little ****ers can't hear what their little pubescent bodies are screaming at them!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-02-2010, 05:46 PM
 
Location: Purgatory (A.K.A. Dallas, Texas)
5,007 posts, read 15,462,716 times
Reputation: 2463
Quote:
Originally Posted by SourD View Post
sex is bad for teenagers not above the age of 17 or 18. Pregnancy will not be good for such youngsters who know next to nothing about life.

What makes it so different at 17 instead of 16? 18 instead of 15?

It's better to simply educate than try to indoctrinate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:12 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top