Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Again, you are trying to rewrite history. Of course I don't have proof because millions of americans were not asked that question of sep 10th 2001. yes, Saddam slid down the lsit... from #1 to #2. And, I agree with you that the UN resolution was pointless. THAT was part of the problem. The UN would not enforce the resolution, and Saddam was defiant. We HAD to act!
I think there are a lot of American families that will feel their legacy all too painfully.
Yeah, I am wondering how S. Fla. is looking...know alot of people there who were hit badly by the housing crisis....they also voted for Bush bcs they thought he helped their houses accrue value in 2001-04....
BULL! #1, he was not a serious threat to America, #2 he certainly slid down the list of world threats on 9/11.
And as seems your habit, no answers to simple questions.
You've alleged Saddam would have been named by most as the biggest threat against America on 9/10/01.
You have what to support that allegation?
Interesting too that no one asks where Bin Laden is.......where???? and why did a few Saudi get to fly out of the U.S. on the DAY 9/11, as allowed by Bush.........(read: House of Bush, House of Saud-Unger)
I don't read the limbaugh letter. As for news, I watch/read it from many sources. Nice try though
Thus, you label a documentary as a "hollywood movie".
Of course, it's not a documentary that supports your Bush-apologizing viewpoint, so you just dismiss it out of hand. Yep, you're on top of things and have an accurate view of the events leading to the Great Bush Recession.
Again, interesting how the far right posting about Palin and how great the GOP is, are not contributing to this thread......Bush and his legacy, isnt that an important part of our history? Im not hearing any positives.........I guess they are too busy watching reality tv on the TLC channel.lol
I'm happy to break the news to you. A little thing called 9/11 (perhaps you've heard) happened after Bush was elected and should have changed Iraq's place in our order of priorities. The other news is Bush himself has stated HE made the decision to invade Iraq, HE owns it, lock, stock, and barrel.
And I'm happy to break the news to you that Bush couldn't do ANYTHING WITHOUT the APPROVAL OF CONGRESS.
And I'm happy to break the news to you that Bush couldn't do ANYTHING WITHOUT the APPROVAL OF CONGRESS.
And you're just saying that his campaign of disinformation to manufacture support worked on congress just like it did on the public.
Heck, I bought into it, too. No doubt you did and probably still do.
Update: it was bullsht.
Quote:
We don't live under Monarchy rule.
Today, American live under corporate rule. Like that's a whole lot better.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yep, you're on top of things.
