Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 11-23-2010, 12:50 PM
 
10,854 posts, read 9,297,960 times
Reputation: 3122

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerbacon View Post
This shelling by the north is a direct result of the South's lack of response when the norht sunk a South Korean warship earlier this year. If you don't stand up to a thug, you will get more thuggish behavior.

The United States should pull its 30,000 troops away from the DMZ down to the southern half of South Korea. From there they could still react quickly to aggression but they would be out of range of the Norhts NUMEROUS artillery and rocket pieces. Where they are now they are, sadly, not much more than human shields and would suffer high casualties in a North Korean first strike.

I would like to see a few weeks of airstrikes to destroy the North's artillery capability. They can't invade the south because they lack the logistical capability to move their bloated army. They are a defensive army with tons of artillery. Destroy their artillery and they have nothing left. Of course, the capital of the south is within range of that artillery so they would suffer casualties, which is why the South's politicians don't want to take action.

1 Redeploy US troops out of artillery range
2 air strikes to destroy artillery
3 Optional land invasion to change regime and finally end the Korean war which has been in effect for over half a century.

Once again YOU CANNOT DESTROY NORTH KOREAN ARTILLERY WITHOUT SUSTAINING HEAVY SOUTH KOREAN CIVILIAN CASUALTIES!

Where are we going to get the troops to invade North Korea? The North Korean Army is over 1 million soldiers strong?

Do think that North Korea with a leader that is not the most stable in the world and in possession of nuclear weapons is going to sit idle and let an invasion force build up?

And who is going to pay for all this s**t?


Another keyboard commando!
Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-23-2010, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,756,720 times
Reputation: 24863
I was not aware the North Korean leadership was advanced enough to make fire let alone exchange it.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2010, 01:31 PM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,521,713 times
Reputation: 7807
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueBlueBlue View Post
Obama needs to make a STRONG statement about this. North Korea has been harassing South Korea militarily, killing dozens of their soldiers since Obama took office. North Korea knows that South Korea will not take any strong counter action unless it has U.S. support. If Obama continues his lax policies towards North Korea, there will come a day when North Korea will do something extremely drastic and it will be TOO late to do anything about.

Since Obama took office? Are you completely devoid of any knowledge of history AT ALL?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2010, 01:47 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,442,711 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
Since Obama took office? Are you completely devoid of any knowledge of history AT ALL?
And these people use their "knowledge" to make a basis for their votes.
Are you scared yet ?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2010, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,687,243 times
Reputation: 9980
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueBlueBlue View Post
All you folks calling this common know nothing of history. This was the first artillery strike on South Korean soil since the end of the Korean war.

On top of everything, a CIVILIAN (civilians WERE injured) town was targeted in this attack (check out news reports, one guy didn't get blown to pieces by a shell by about 200 feet or so, caught on video).

So no, this is not the same as every other incident that has occurred between North and South Korea since the end of the Korean war.

I believe a swift and tactical strike should be carried out to neutralize all North Korean artillery units along the border, particularly those near Incheon and Seoul. Intelligence over the years ought to provide us enough information to be able to hit most of their artillery units with devastating force before they could react. This would send a VERY strong message to NK. Otherwise, one day they may "accidentally" launch an artillery salvo at a major city.
Wow, then those artillery strikes I endured on each of my three tours on the Korean DMZ in the 1960s never happened. Every week there would be one or two ads in the Stars and Stripes

Anyone having claim against or owing to the estate of SP/4................
contact JAG. because they were killed on the DMZ
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2010, 01:56 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,943,270 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by rogerbacon View Post
This shelling by the north is a direct result of the South's lack of response when the norht sunk a South Korean warship earlier this year. If you don't stand up to a thug, you will get more thuggish behavior.

The United States should pull its 30,000 troops away from the DMZ down to the southern half of South Korea. From there they could still react quickly to aggression but they would be out of range of the Norhts NUMEROUS artillery and rocket pieces. Where they are now they are, sadly, not much more than human shields and would suffer high casualties in a North Korean first strike.

I would like to see a few weeks of airstrikes to destroy the North's artillery capability. They can't invade the south because they lack the logistical capability to move their bloated army. They are a defensive army with tons of artillery. Destroy their artillery and they have nothing left. Of course, the capital of the south is within range of that artillery so they would suffer casualties, which is why the South's politicians don't want to take action.

1 Redeploy US troops out of artillery range
2 air strikes to destroy artillery
3 Optional land invasion to change regime and finally end the Korean war which has been in effect for over half a century.
You obviously don't know why the 30K troops are located where they are. Everyone who has ever been there knows why they are there. They know that they would not last more than a day with a full scale invasion. They would all die...That is why they are there. They are the deterrent, not because they can hold off an attack, but because if we lost that many men we would have no choice but to declare war on Korea...that is the deterrent. I thought everyone knew that.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2010, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
17,531 posts, read 24,687,243 times
Reputation: 9980
South Korea has over 300,000 men on active duty and a 24 hour call up of well over one million in a country smaller than New Jersey. They can protect themselves. Using Nukes in Korea would destroy both sides
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2010, 02:06 PM
 
8,652 posts, read 17,234,865 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
WHEN did he claim to be? Unlike the 'family values' spouting hypocrite Republicans, the prime example being the adulterer they sent on a witch hunt for Clinton.
" I did not have sex with that woman "

Remember that?
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2010, 02:11 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,213,219 times
Reputation: 6553
This is a problem for the Korea's to work out. Its that simple.
Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2010, 02:15 PM
 
888 posts, read 1,186,383 times
Reputation: 618
We have treaty obligations with South Korea.
It really is NOT that simple.

Steve
Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


 
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:
Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top