Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-27-2011, 09:55 AM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,922,570 times
Reputation: 13807

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
And this really is the crux of the problem and the fundamental difference in the way the left and right view people. The left view people as not as smart as them and in need of their guidence and protection. The right views people as perfectly capable of making rational decisions for themselves.

Under our current system, people are at the mercy of payers who would rather not pay and have a vested interest in minimizing consumption. And this situation will be accelerated by Obamacare.
Its not a left/right thing (and you really need to move away from that conflictual model). I do what I do and I am pretty good at it. But I am not a doctor or other health care professional. My expertise is elsewhere. So, I find a doctor that I like and trust and follow his advice. Certainly we have an informed conversation but, ultimately, he knows more about the subject than I do. People can make rational decisions but they remain dependent on health care professionals to provide them with the information to make those decisions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-27-2011, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,752,619 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
Its not a left/right thing (and you really need to move away from that conflictual model). I do what I do and I am pretty good at it. But I am not a doctor or other health care professional. My expertise is elsewhere. So, I find a doctor that I like and trust and follow his advice. Certainly we have an informed conversation but, ultimately, he knows more about the subject than I do. People can make rational decisions but they remain dependent on health care professionals to provide them with the information to make those decisions.

It really is a left right thing. The left, for the most part believes in larger government because they view the people as too weak to take care of themselves. The right prefers smaller government because they believe in the primacy of the individual.

I understand your reliance on your health care profession, it is wise. I am equally sure you chose that person with care and you have a great deal of trust in them as a clinician and an ethical person. I would suspect you would trust that person to do what is in your best interest or you would select another provider of health care. I have confidence in you to select the person who will act in your best interest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2011, 10:16 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
.

Oh, and I also thought conservatives were opposed to deficit spending. How do they plan on financing $311B?
simple cut the 340 billion mediciad yearly costs ..and climbing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2011, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
simple cut the 340 billion mediciad yearly costs ..and climbing
Someone has to be cut. After all, you do support rationing of health care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2011, 10:44 AM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,922,570 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
It really is a left right thing. The left, for the most part believes in larger government because they view the people as too weak to take care of themselves. The right prefers smaller government because they believe in the primacy of the individual.

I understand your reliance on your health care profession, it is wise. I am equally sure you chose that person with care and you have a great deal of trust in them as a clinician and an ethical person. I would suspect you would trust that person to do what is in your best interest or you would select another provider of health care. I have confidence in you to select the person who will act in your best interest.
As a society, we have accepted that we will pick up health care costs of those unwilling or unable to pay. That could be seniors, the poor, veterans, etc.. This isn't a left/right thing. It is as much Reagan or Bush as it is Clinton or Obama. In addition, the public expects to be protected from bad doctors, bad nurses or bad drugs. Because of the above, you can never take government out of health care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2011, 10:52 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,818,277 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
It really is a left right thing. The left, for the most part believes in larger government because they view the people as too weak to take care of themselves. The right prefers smaller government because they believe in the primacy of the individual.
How about the idea that the left prefers government to be involved while the right wants no government intervention, that it should be an all-private-enterprise affair?

The problem with your argument is that it suggests a "small government", implying, government should stay out of the way unless private businesses can't handle it... then the government should intrude.

I don't think this country was founded on that notion, although the idea has been practiced by many politicians in other countries a few decades ago. There is another thread being discussed about the mandate imposed on all seamen so as to cover everybody and government run hospitals (I have not been participating in that discussion so I don't know if you're). The notion of "you're on your own" wouldn't involve any step like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2011, 10:55 AM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,938,118 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Republican Paul Ryan, now chairman of the House budget committee, supports rationing health care for US seniors. His plan to voucherize Medicare is the classic example of rationing care. Under his plan the government would only give seniors a voucher for a certain amount of money and any extra cost would be paid by senior citizens themselves. His plan is to slowly shrink Medicare voucher checks over time leaving senior citizens left to pay more and more for health care.

Why does Paul Ryan and the Republicans want to pull the plug on grandma?
I hope he is updating his resume, NEVER pissoff the retires you Will get voted out.
Casper
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2011, 10:57 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,488,320 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Someone has to be cut. After all, you do support rationing of health care.
no I dont support RATIONING or health care...I dont support SUBSIDIZING it either...I think health care should be a PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY...

there is no reason the government should be paying for ANYBODIES care.. and there is no reason for insurance...get rid of it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2011, 10:58 AM
 
14,247 posts, read 17,922,570 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
no I dont support RATIONING or health care...I dont support SUBSIDIZING it either...I think health care should be a PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY...

there is no reason the government should be paying for ANYBODIES care.. and there is no reason for insurance...get rid of it
So, what happens if someone cannot afford to pay? Do you let them die?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-27-2011, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Hoboken
19,890 posts, read 18,752,619 times
Reputation: 3146
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaggy001 View Post
As a society, we have accepted that we will pick up health care costs of those unwilling or unable to pay. That could be seniors, the poor, veterans, etc.. This isn't a left/right thing. It is as much Reagan or Bush as it is Clinton or Obama. In addition, the public expects to be protected from bad doctors, bad nurses or bad drugs. Because of the above, you can never take government out of health care.

Picking up the tab for those who can't afford it is one thing, Obamacare is another thing entirely. I am not willing to pick up the tab for someone who is "unwilling' to pay.

Who said take government out of health care? I am for liscensing health care providers and the FDA etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top